手术训练和学习对腹腔镜腹腔镜腹股沟疝治疗结果的影响

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Chirurgie Pub Date : 1999-06-01 DOI:10.1016/S0001-4001(99)80096-8
C. Barrat , J.P. Voreux , G. Occelli , J.M. Catheline , G. Champault
{"title":"手术训练和学习对腹腔镜腹腔镜腹股沟疝治疗结果的影响","authors":"C. Barrat ,&nbsp;J.P. Voreux ,&nbsp;G. Occelli ,&nbsp;J.M. Catheline ,&nbsp;G. Champault","doi":"10.1016/S0001-4001(99)80096-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study aim</h3><p>The aim of this retrospective study was to compare two concurrent series of patients operated on for inguinal hernia with the same laparoscopic procedure, the first one in a teaching hospital with a number of trained surgeons and the second one in a private center with only one trained surgeon.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and method</h3><p>Five hundred and forty-one patients with 757 hernias were operated on over a period of six years by a totally pre-peritoneal laparoscopic approach. Two hundred and sixteen patients were operated on in a teaching hospital by 48 surgeons (six senior and 42 trainee surgeons; group I), 325 were operated on in a private center by one surgeon who had been trained in the same teaching hospital (group II). The two groups of patients and their hernias were comparable. The comparison was established on the following criteria: duration of operation, rate of conversion, length of hospitalization, morbidity and mortality rate, recurrence rate and costs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Operations performed by surgical trainees were associated with: (1) a mean operative time significantly (<em>P</em> = 0.01) longer for both unilateral (68 vs. 41 min) and bilateral (108 vs. 68 min) hernias. The operative time did not change in the teaching hospital and decreased with experience in private practice (from 62 to 25 min for unilateral hernias); (2) more frequent per-operative complications, particularly opening of the peritoneum (28% vs. 3%, <em>P</em> = 0.001); (3) a mean duration of hospitalization significantly (<em>P</em> = 0.05) longer, on average by 1.6 d; (4) a morbidity rate after 30 days significantly higher (16.2% vs. 4.9%, <em>P</em> = 0.01); and, (5) higher costs. There was no significant difference concerning mortality rate (nil), conversion rate (1.5%) and recurrence rate (1.3% vs. 0.6%, non significant).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Surgical training for laparoscopic treatment of inguinal hernias was associated with a longer operation time and hospital stay, and with higher morbidity and costs. After a good initial training in a teaching hospital, surgeons were capable of performing laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias with good results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29786,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgie","volume":"124 3","pages":"Pages 298-303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0001-4001(99)80096-8","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence de la formation chirurgicale et de l'apprentissage sur les résultats du traitement laparoscopique des hernies de l'aine\",\"authors\":\"C. Barrat ,&nbsp;J.P. Voreux ,&nbsp;G. Occelli ,&nbsp;J.M. Catheline ,&nbsp;G. Champault\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0001-4001(99)80096-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Study aim</h3><p>The aim of this retrospective study was to compare two concurrent series of patients operated on for inguinal hernia with the same laparoscopic procedure, the first one in a teaching hospital with a number of trained surgeons and the second one in a private center with only one trained surgeon.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and method</h3><p>Five hundred and forty-one patients with 757 hernias were operated on over a period of six years by a totally pre-peritoneal laparoscopic approach. Two hundred and sixteen patients were operated on in a teaching hospital by 48 surgeons (six senior and 42 trainee surgeons; group I), 325 were operated on in a private center by one surgeon who had been trained in the same teaching hospital (group II). The two groups of patients and their hernias were comparable. The comparison was established on the following criteria: duration of operation, rate of conversion, length of hospitalization, morbidity and mortality rate, recurrence rate and costs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Operations performed by surgical trainees were associated with: (1) a mean operative time significantly (<em>P</em> = 0.01) longer for both unilateral (68 vs. 41 min) and bilateral (108 vs. 68 min) hernias. The operative time did not change in the teaching hospital and decreased with experience in private practice (from 62 to 25 min for unilateral hernias); (2) more frequent per-operative complications, particularly opening of the peritoneum (28% vs. 3%, <em>P</em> = 0.001); (3) a mean duration of hospitalization significantly (<em>P</em> = 0.05) longer, on average by 1.6 d; (4) a morbidity rate after 30 days significantly higher (16.2% vs. 4.9%, <em>P</em> = 0.01); and, (5) higher costs. There was no significant difference concerning mortality rate (nil), conversion rate (1.5%) and recurrence rate (1.3% vs. 0.6%, non significant).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Surgical training for laparoscopic treatment of inguinal hernias was associated with a longer operation time and hospital stay, and with higher morbidity and costs. After a good initial training in a teaching hospital, surgeons were capable of performing laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias with good results.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chirurgie\",\"volume\":\"124 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 298-303\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0001-4001(99)80096-8\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chirurgie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001400199800968\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001400199800968","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

研究目的本回顾性研究的目的是比较两组同时采用相同腹腔镜手术治疗腹股沟疝的患者,第一组患者在教学医院接受多名训练有素的外科医生手术,第二组患者在私立中心接受一名训练有素的外科医生手术。患者与方法对541例757例疝气患者进行全腹膜前腹腔镜入路手术。在一家教学医院,由48名外科医生(6名高级外科医生和42名实习外科医生)对216名患者进行了手术;第一组),325例由同一家教学医院培训的一名外科医生在私人中心进行手术(第二组)。两组患者及其疝气具有可比性。根据以下标准进行比较:手术时间、转换率、住院时间、发病率和死亡率、复发率和费用。结果接受外科培训的学员进行的手术与:(1)单侧疝(68 vs. 41 min)和双侧疝(108 vs. 68 min)的平均手术时间显著延长(P = 0.01)。教学医院的手术时间没有变化,随着私人执业经验的增加而减少(单侧疝从62分钟减少到25分钟);(2)更频繁的术后并发症,特别是腹膜打开(28% vs. 3%, P = 0.001);(3)平均住院时间明显延长(P = 0.05),平均延长1.6 d;(4) 30 d后发病率显著高于对照组(16.2% vs. 4.9%, P = 0.01);(5)更高的成本。死亡率(零)、转换率(1.5%)和复发率(1.3%对0.6%,无统计学意义)差异无统计学意义。结论腹腔镜下手术训练治疗腹股沟疝手术时间和住院时间较长,且发病率和费用较高。在教学医院接受良好的初步培训后,外科医生能够进行腹腔镜修补腹股沟疝并取得良好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence de la formation chirurgicale et de l'apprentissage sur les résultats du traitement laparoscopique des hernies de l'aine

Study aim

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare two concurrent series of patients operated on for inguinal hernia with the same laparoscopic procedure, the first one in a teaching hospital with a number of trained surgeons and the second one in a private center with only one trained surgeon.

Patients and method

Five hundred and forty-one patients with 757 hernias were operated on over a period of six years by a totally pre-peritoneal laparoscopic approach. Two hundred and sixteen patients were operated on in a teaching hospital by 48 surgeons (six senior and 42 trainee surgeons; group I), 325 were operated on in a private center by one surgeon who had been trained in the same teaching hospital (group II). The two groups of patients and their hernias were comparable. The comparison was established on the following criteria: duration of operation, rate of conversion, length of hospitalization, morbidity and mortality rate, recurrence rate and costs.

Results

Operations performed by surgical trainees were associated with: (1) a mean operative time significantly (P = 0.01) longer for both unilateral (68 vs. 41 min) and bilateral (108 vs. 68 min) hernias. The operative time did not change in the teaching hospital and decreased with experience in private practice (from 62 to 25 min for unilateral hernias); (2) more frequent per-operative complications, particularly opening of the peritoneum (28% vs. 3%, P = 0.001); (3) a mean duration of hospitalization significantly (P = 0.05) longer, on average by 1.6 d; (4) a morbidity rate after 30 days significantly higher (16.2% vs. 4.9%, P = 0.01); and, (5) higher costs. There was no significant difference concerning mortality rate (nil), conversion rate (1.5%) and recurrence rate (1.3% vs. 0.6%, non significant).

Conclusion

Surgical training for laparoscopic treatment of inguinal hernias was associated with a longer operation time and hospital stay, and with higher morbidity and costs. After a good initial training in a teaching hospital, surgeons were capable of performing laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias with good results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
22.20%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lebermetastasen neuroendokriner Tumoren Hepatozelluläres Karzinom [Osteoporosis: diagnostics and treatment]. Der Weg zum Kompetenzzentrum für Adipositas und metabolische Chirurgie – Erfahrungen aus 2 verschiedenen Kliniken Klinischer Stellenwert alternativer Technologien zur standardmäßigen laparoskopischen Cholezystektomie – Single-Port, Reduced-Port, Roboter, NOTES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1