[1999年如何评估卵巢储备?]

B Hédon, H Dechaud, F Galtier-Dereure, N Guigue
{"title":"[1999年如何评估卵巢储备?]","authors":"B Hédon,&nbsp;H Dechaud,&nbsp;F Galtier-Dereure,&nbsp;N Guigue","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fertility and results of infertility therapies are submitted to amajor drop in relation with the age of the female patient and her so-called ovarian reserve. Although there is no clear definition of what is exactly the ovarian reserve, the consequence of its decline is a greater difficulty to produce ovocytes with a capacity of becoming living embryos after fertilization. Several tests have been developed to assess the ovarian reserve in order to evaluate the prognosis of spontaneous fertility, the results of infertility therapy and assisted procreation techniques, and to make necessary technical adaptations. Basal determinations of FSH, estradiol and inhibin B at day 3 of the cycle an all reflect the ovarian potential, but only FSH reflects a decline infecundability reliable enough to be used as a screening test. Challenge tests such as the clomiphene citrate, the exogenous FSH or the GnRH challenge tests have the purpose to reveal an exaggerated liberation of FSH or an insufficient secretion of estradiol after stimulation. None of these tests have demonstrated a better sensibility together with a higher specificity and they should be considered as evaluating tools in specific cases only. In conclusion, assessing the ovarian reserve has become a clinical necessity in the following situations: ovulation defect, unexplained infertility, before undergoing ovarian stimulation for assisted procreation, in particular in women above the age of 35. This assessment can be made by determining the basal FSH level on day 3 of a cycle and should be renewed every year.</p>","PeriodicalId":79332,"journal":{"name":"Contraception, fertilite, sexualite (1992)","volume":"27 6","pages":"412-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[How to assess ovarian reserve in 1999?].\",\"authors\":\"B Hédon,&nbsp;H Dechaud,&nbsp;F Galtier-Dereure,&nbsp;N Guigue\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Fertility and results of infertility therapies are submitted to amajor drop in relation with the age of the female patient and her so-called ovarian reserve. Although there is no clear definition of what is exactly the ovarian reserve, the consequence of its decline is a greater difficulty to produce ovocytes with a capacity of becoming living embryos after fertilization. Several tests have been developed to assess the ovarian reserve in order to evaluate the prognosis of spontaneous fertility, the results of infertility therapy and assisted procreation techniques, and to make necessary technical adaptations. Basal determinations of FSH, estradiol and inhibin B at day 3 of the cycle an all reflect the ovarian potential, but only FSH reflects a decline infecundability reliable enough to be used as a screening test. Challenge tests such as the clomiphene citrate, the exogenous FSH or the GnRH challenge tests have the purpose to reveal an exaggerated liberation of FSH or an insufficient secretion of estradiol after stimulation. None of these tests have demonstrated a better sensibility together with a higher specificity and they should be considered as evaluating tools in specific cases only. In conclusion, assessing the ovarian reserve has become a clinical necessity in the following situations: ovulation defect, unexplained infertility, before undergoing ovarian stimulation for assisted procreation, in particular in women above the age of 35. This assessment can be made by determining the basal FSH level on day 3 of a cycle and should be renewed every year.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception, fertilite, sexualite (1992)\",\"volume\":\"27 6\",\"pages\":\"412-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception, fertilite, sexualite (1992)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception, fertilite, sexualite (1992)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生育能力和不孕症治疗的结果与女性患者的年龄和她所谓的卵巢储备有关。尽管对于卵巢储备究竟是什么没有明确的定义,但其下降的后果是受精后产生具有成为活胚胎能力的卵母细胞变得更加困难。为了评估自然生育的预后、不孕症治疗和辅助生殖技术的结果,并作出必要的技术调整,已经开发了几种测试来评估卵巢储备。周期第3天FSH、雌二醇和抑制素B的基础测定都反映了卵巢潜能,但只有FSH反映了下降的不可推断性,足够可靠,可以用作筛选试验。刺激试验如枸橼酸克罗米芬、外源性促卵泡刺激素或GnRH刺激试验的目的是揭示刺激后促卵泡刺激素释放过高或雌二醇分泌不足。这些测试都没有表现出更好的敏感性和更高的特异性,它们应被视为仅在特定情况下的评估工具。总之,在以下情况下评估卵巢储备已成为临床必要:排卵缺陷,不明原因的不孕症,在进行卵巢刺激辅助生殖之前,特别是35岁以上的女性。这种评估可以通过在月经周期的第3天测定基础促卵泡刺激素水平来进行,并应每年更新一次。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[How to assess ovarian reserve in 1999?].

Fertility and results of infertility therapies are submitted to amajor drop in relation with the age of the female patient and her so-called ovarian reserve. Although there is no clear definition of what is exactly the ovarian reserve, the consequence of its decline is a greater difficulty to produce ovocytes with a capacity of becoming living embryos after fertilization. Several tests have been developed to assess the ovarian reserve in order to evaluate the prognosis of spontaneous fertility, the results of infertility therapy and assisted procreation techniques, and to make necessary technical adaptations. Basal determinations of FSH, estradiol and inhibin B at day 3 of the cycle an all reflect the ovarian potential, but only FSH reflects a decline infecundability reliable enough to be used as a screening test. Challenge tests such as the clomiphene citrate, the exogenous FSH or the GnRH challenge tests have the purpose to reveal an exaggerated liberation of FSH or an insufficient secretion of estradiol after stimulation. None of these tests have demonstrated a better sensibility together with a higher specificity and they should be considered as evaluating tools in specific cases only. In conclusion, assessing the ovarian reserve has become a clinical necessity in the following situations: ovulation defect, unexplained infertility, before undergoing ovarian stimulation for assisted procreation, in particular in women above the age of 35. This assessment can be made by determining the basal FSH level on day 3 of a cycle and should be renewed every year.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Theory and practice of daily prescription and gynecologic consultation for treatment of hyperandrogenism. Indications and contraindications]. [What remains of the postcoital test?]. [Are cervicovaginal smears feasible in women over 65 years under hormone replacement therapy?]. [Should cytological screening for cervical cancer be stopped after menopause?]. [Diabetes before pregnancy, apropos of 143 cases].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1