生物体液中细胞因子和生长因子的免疫测定。

W Kopp, C Reynolds, F Ruscetti
{"title":"生物体液中细胞因子和生长因子的免疫测定。","authors":"W Kopp,&nbsp;C Reynolds,&nbsp;F Ruscetti","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are a number of problems associated with the development of standards suitable for use in the most commonly used assays to detect cytokines in biological fluids. These problems include: (i) the failure of some MoAbs used in immunoassays to detect all different <<species>> of recombinant or natural material; (ii) the use of many different MoAbs, with different specificities, in different immunoassay kits, and (iii) the detection of non-active cytokines (fragments, inhibitors, receptor antagonists, etc.) in these immunoassays. As a result, it is possible to have biologically active material which is not detected in these immunoassays. Alternatively, biologically inactive material can be detected in these assays and is indistinguishable from biologically active material. In addition, the use of different antibodies with different specificities, affinities and avidities in different kits designed to detect the same biological materials results in markedly different sensitivities and specificities. Many of these same concerns can be raised for the use of bioassays for detection of molecules in biological fluids. The solution will not be simple (if possible at all). In most cases, the immunoassay kits are designed to detect <<natural>> material in biological fluids, but are made with MoAbs against recombinant material. Because of the markedly different specificities, affinities, etc. of the MoAbs in these kits, their standardization is possible only with a highly purified preparation of natural material. For the assay of recombinant materials, immunoassays should be specifically designed with the recombinant material in mind (i.e. the MoAbs made specifically against the recombinant material to be detected or shown to bind effectively with the recombinant material). Importantly, it should be made clear to investigators using different immunoassays that: (i) the reporting of biological material detected using immunoassays can only be made in units of weight (i.e. ng/ml); (ii) because of the detection of biologically active and inactive material using immunoassay kits these assays cannot be directly compared to bioassays or their results represented as <<activity units>>; (iii) because of the difference in specificity and sensitivity of the different reagents used in different immunoassays, the results from different assays cannot be directly compared, and (iv) because of these same considerations, comparison of different <species>> of materials within a single immunoassay is also not possible. The use of specific immunoassays for recombinant material in combination with bioassays and the use of cytokine standards, made from highly purified natural material, would help to standardize the results in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":11308,"journal":{"name":"Developments in biological standardization","volume":"97 ","pages":"29-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The immunoassay of cytokines and growth factors in biological fluids.\",\"authors\":\"W Kopp,&nbsp;C Reynolds,&nbsp;F Ruscetti\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There are a number of problems associated with the development of standards suitable for use in the most commonly used assays to detect cytokines in biological fluids. These problems include: (i) the failure of some MoAbs used in immunoassays to detect all different <<species>> of recombinant or natural material; (ii) the use of many different MoAbs, with different specificities, in different immunoassay kits, and (iii) the detection of non-active cytokines (fragments, inhibitors, receptor antagonists, etc.) in these immunoassays. As a result, it is possible to have biologically active material which is not detected in these immunoassays. Alternatively, biologically inactive material can be detected in these assays and is indistinguishable from biologically active material. In addition, the use of different antibodies with different specificities, affinities and avidities in different kits designed to detect the same biological materials results in markedly different sensitivities and specificities. Many of these same concerns can be raised for the use of bioassays for detection of molecules in biological fluids. The solution will not be simple (if possible at all). In most cases, the immunoassay kits are designed to detect <<natural>> material in biological fluids, but are made with MoAbs against recombinant material. Because of the markedly different specificities, affinities, etc. of the MoAbs in these kits, their standardization is possible only with a highly purified preparation of natural material. For the assay of recombinant materials, immunoassays should be specifically designed with the recombinant material in mind (i.e. the MoAbs made specifically against the recombinant material to be detected or shown to bind effectively with the recombinant material). Importantly, it should be made clear to investigators using different immunoassays that: (i) the reporting of biological material detected using immunoassays can only be made in units of weight (i.e. ng/ml); (ii) because of the detection of biologically active and inactive material using immunoassay kits these assays cannot be directly compared to bioassays or their results represented as <<activity units>>; (iii) because of the difference in specificity and sensitivity of the different reagents used in different immunoassays, the results from different assays cannot be directly compared, and (iv) because of these same considerations, comparison of different <species>> of materials within a single immunoassay is also not possible. The use of specific immunoassays for recombinant material in combination with bioassays and the use of cytokine standards, made from highly purified natural material, would help to standardize the results in this field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developments in biological standardization\",\"volume\":\"97 \",\"pages\":\"29-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developments in biological standardization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developments in biological standardization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在制定适用于检测生物液体中细胞因子的最常用测定法的标准时,存在许多问题。这些问题包括:(i)免疫分析中使用的一些moab不能检测所有不同的重组或天然材料;(ii)在不同的免疫测定试剂盒中使用许多具有不同特异性的moab抗体,以及(iii)在这些免疫测定中检测非活性细胞因子(片段、抑制剂、受体拮抗剂等)。因此,有可能具有在这些免疫测定中未检测到的生物活性物质。或者,可以在这些分析中检测到生物非活性材料,并且与生物活性材料无法区分。此外,在设计用于检测相同生物材料的不同试剂盒中使用具有不同特异性、亲和力和亲和力的不同抗体,会导致明显不同的敏感性和特异性。对于使用生物测定法检测生物液体中的分子,可以提出许多同样的关切。解决方案并不简单(如果可能的话)。在大多数情况下,免疫测定试剂盒的设计目的是检测生物体液中的非物质,但使用的是针对重组物质的moab抗体。由于这些试剂盒中moab的特异性、亲和力等明显不同,它们的标准化只能通过高度纯化的天然材料制备。对于重组材料的测定,免疫测定法应专门设计重组材料(即,针对待检测的重组材料专门制作的MoAbs或显示与重组材料有效结合)。重要的是,应向使用不同免疫测定法的调查人员明确:(i)使用免疫测定法检测的生物材料的报告只能以重量为单位(即ng/ml);(ii)由于使用免疫测定试剂盒检测生物活性和非活性物质,这些测定不能直接与生物测定相比较或其结果表示为>;(iii)由于不同免疫测定中使用的不同试剂的特异性和敏感性不同,因此不能直接比较不同测定的结果,并且(iv)由于同样的考虑,在单一免疫测定中也不可能比较不同的材料。将重组材料的特异性免疫测定与生物测定相结合,并使用由高度纯化的天然材料制成的细胞因子标准,将有助于标准化该领域的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The immunoassay of cytokines and growth factors in biological fluids.

There are a number of problems associated with the development of standards suitable for use in the most commonly used assays to detect cytokines in biological fluids. These problems include: (i) the failure of some MoAbs used in immunoassays to detect all different <> of recombinant or natural material; (ii) the use of many different MoAbs, with different specificities, in different immunoassay kits, and (iii) the detection of non-active cytokines (fragments, inhibitors, receptor antagonists, etc.) in these immunoassays. As a result, it is possible to have biologically active material which is not detected in these immunoassays. Alternatively, biologically inactive material can be detected in these assays and is indistinguishable from biologically active material. In addition, the use of different antibodies with different specificities, affinities and avidities in different kits designed to detect the same biological materials results in markedly different sensitivities and specificities. Many of these same concerns can be raised for the use of bioassays for detection of molecules in biological fluids. The solution will not be simple (if possible at all). In most cases, the immunoassay kits are designed to detect <> material in biological fluids, but are made with MoAbs against recombinant material. Because of the markedly different specificities, affinities, etc. of the MoAbs in these kits, their standardization is possible only with a highly purified preparation of natural material. For the assay of recombinant materials, immunoassays should be specifically designed with the recombinant material in mind (i.e. the MoAbs made specifically against the recombinant material to be detected or shown to bind effectively with the recombinant material). Importantly, it should be made clear to investigators using different immunoassays that: (i) the reporting of biological material detected using immunoassays can only be made in units of weight (i.e. ng/ml); (ii) because of the detection of biologically active and inactive material using immunoassay kits these assays cannot be directly compared to bioassays or their results represented as <>; (iii) because of the difference in specificity and sensitivity of the different reagents used in different immunoassays, the results from different assays cannot be directly compared, and (iv) because of these same considerations, comparison of different > of materials within a single immunoassay is also not possible. The use of specific immunoassays for recombinant material in combination with bioassays and the use of cytokine standards, made from highly purified natural material, would help to standardize the results in this field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Virus removal by filtration. Gamma irradiation of bovine sera. Efficient inactivation of viruses and mycoplasma in animal sera using UVC irradiation. A universal virus inactivant for decontaminating blood and biopharmaceutical products. Serum and serum substitutes: virus safety by inactivation or removal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1