癌症筛查数据库的创建:是否需要客户的同意?

J F Kotalik, G Holloway, H Woodbeck
{"title":"癌症筛查数据库的创建:是否需要客户的同意?","authors":"J F Kotalik,&nbsp;G Holloway,&nbsp;H Woodbeck","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Professional caregivers have an obligation to maintain the privacy and confidentiality of all personal information given to them by their patients or clients. Such information is to be released to a party who is not participating in the care of the patient only with the express consent of the patient. The question is whether or not the express consent of a client of an organized cancer screening program is ethically required before the client's personal information is entered into a centralized database. The arguments in favour of express consent are grounded largely in a desire to respect clients' privacy and autonomy fully. The arguments for the reliance on nonexpress, implied or tacit consent are based chiefly on the desire to provide clients with the full benefits of screening. It is suggested here that neither extreme position is satisfactory. A novel, balanced approach that would be sensitive to both electronic data storage and a preventive care situation is needed. Progress on this issue requires focused empirical research, a debate in both professional and public forums, and further critical analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":79570,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC","volume":"3 2","pages":"119-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The creation of a database for cancer screening: is the consent of clients required?\",\"authors\":\"J F Kotalik,&nbsp;G Holloway,&nbsp;H Woodbeck\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Professional caregivers have an obligation to maintain the privacy and confidentiality of all personal information given to them by their patients or clients. Such information is to be released to a party who is not participating in the care of the patient only with the express consent of the patient. The question is whether or not the express consent of a client of an organized cancer screening program is ethically required before the client's personal information is entered into a centralized database. The arguments in favour of express consent are grounded largely in a desire to respect clients' privacy and autonomy fully. The arguments for the reliance on nonexpress, implied or tacit consent are based chiefly on the desire to provide clients with the full benefits of screening. It is suggested here that neither extreme position is satisfactory. A novel, balanced approach that would be sensitive to both electronic data storage and a preventive care situation is needed. Progress on this issue requires focused empirical research, a debate in both professional and public forums, and further critical analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"119-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

专业护理人员有义务维护病人或客户提供给他们的所有个人信息的隐私和机密性。只有在患者明确同意的情况下,这些信息才会发布给不参与患者护理的一方。问题是,在将客户的个人信息输入中央数据库之前,是否需要客户明确同意有组织的癌症筛查项目,这在道德上是必要的。支持明确同意的论点主要基于充分尊重客户隐私和自主权的愿望。依赖非明示、暗示或默认同意的论点主要是基于为客户提供筛查的全部好处的愿望。这里认为,两种极端的立场都不能令人满意。需要一种对电子数据存储和预防保健情况都敏感的新颖、平衡的方法。在这个问题上取得进展需要集中的实证研究,在专业和公共论坛上进行辩论,以及进一步的批判性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The creation of a database for cancer screening: is the consent of clients required?

Professional caregivers have an obligation to maintain the privacy and confidentiality of all personal information given to them by their patients or clients. Such information is to be released to a party who is not participating in the care of the patient only with the express consent of the patient. The question is whether or not the express consent of a client of an organized cancer screening program is ethically required before the client's personal information is entered into a centralized database. The arguments in favour of express consent are grounded largely in a desire to respect clients' privacy and autonomy fully. The arguments for the reliance on nonexpress, implied or tacit consent are based chiefly on the desire to provide clients with the full benefits of screening. It is suggested here that neither extreme position is satisfactory. A novel, balanced approach that would be sensitive to both electronic data storage and a preventive care situation is needed. Progress on this issue requires focused empirical research, a debate in both professional and public forums, and further critical analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Have diagnostic practices contributed to trends in leukemia incidence and mortality among Canadians? An epidemiological review of red cell transfusions in cancer chemotherapy. Staging in cancer. The importance of alternative therapies to the public. Cancer patients' expectations of the role of family physicians in communication about complementary therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1