一项针对转移性黑色素瘤患者治疗方法的调查:对189名转介至国家癌症研究所的患者的分析。

C E Touloukian, S A Rosenberg
{"title":"一项针对转移性黑色素瘤患者治疗方法的调查:对189名转介至国家癌症研究所的患者的分析。","authors":"C E Touloukian,&nbsp;S A Rosenberg","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few effective treatments exist for patients with metastatic melanoma. The United States Food and Drug Administration has approved the use of interferon alfa-2b after the resection of locoregional disease, and dacarbazine or interleukin-2 for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma beyond the locoregional area, although many additional agents and combinations of agents are currently in use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 1997 and June 1998, the Surgery Branch of the National Cancer Institute conducted a prospective analysis of 226 consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma referred for protocol evaluation. The previous systemic treatments these patients received both before and after the development of metastatic disease were tabulated, along with the association of these treatments with formal institutional protocols. Only the identity of the agents and not the dose or the schedule of treatments was considered in this analysis. Complete information could be obtained from 189 of the 226 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 189 patients evaluated for this study, 135 (71%) received some form of systemic therapy before referral to the National Cancer Institute. Before the development of metastatic disease, 80 patients were administered 25 different systemic treatments, including 23 different agents. After the development of metastatic disease, 53 patients were administered 57 different systemic and regional treatments, including 37 different agents. After the resection of all metastatic sites, 23 patients were administered nine different systemic adjuvant treatments. Overall, 78 different systemic treatments were administered to these patients. The majority of treatments in each group were not associated with formal institutional protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study has demonstrated that a large number of agents and different combinations of agents are currently being administered to patients before and after the development of metastatic melanoma, and frequently not within the context of an approved institutional protocol. These results indicate a need for more formal evaluation of treatments in prospective protocols and greater standardization of the treatment of patients with melanoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":79462,"journal":{"name":"The cancer journal from Scientific American","volume":"5 5","pages":"269-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey of treatments used in patients with metastatic melanoma: analysis of 189 patients referred to the National Cancer Institute.\",\"authors\":\"C E Touloukian,&nbsp;S A Rosenberg\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few effective treatments exist for patients with metastatic melanoma. The United States Food and Drug Administration has approved the use of interferon alfa-2b after the resection of locoregional disease, and dacarbazine or interleukin-2 for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma beyond the locoregional area, although many additional agents and combinations of agents are currently in use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 1997 and June 1998, the Surgery Branch of the National Cancer Institute conducted a prospective analysis of 226 consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma referred for protocol evaluation. The previous systemic treatments these patients received both before and after the development of metastatic disease were tabulated, along with the association of these treatments with formal institutional protocols. Only the identity of the agents and not the dose or the schedule of treatments was considered in this analysis. Complete information could be obtained from 189 of the 226 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 189 patients evaluated for this study, 135 (71%) received some form of systemic therapy before referral to the National Cancer Institute. Before the development of metastatic disease, 80 patients were administered 25 different systemic treatments, including 23 different agents. After the development of metastatic disease, 53 patients were administered 57 different systemic and regional treatments, including 37 different agents. After the resection of all metastatic sites, 23 patients were administered nine different systemic adjuvant treatments. Overall, 78 different systemic treatments were administered to these patients. The majority of treatments in each group were not associated with formal institutional protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study has demonstrated that a large number of agents and different combinations of agents are currently being administered to patients before and after the development of metastatic melanoma, and frequently not within the context of an approved institutional protocol. These results indicate a need for more formal evaluation of treatments in prospective protocols and greater standardization of the treatment of patients with melanoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The cancer journal from Scientific American\",\"volume\":\"5 5\",\"pages\":\"269-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The cancer journal from Scientific American\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The cancer journal from Scientific American","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前对转移性黑色素瘤患者有效的治疗方法很少。美国食品和药物管理局已经批准在局部区域疾病切除后使用干扰素α -2b,并在局部区域以外的转移性黑色素瘤患者中使用达卡巴嗪或白细胞介素-2,尽管目前正在使用许多其他药物和药物组合。方法:1997年1月至1998年6月,美国国家癌症研究所外科分会对226例转移性黑色素瘤患者进行了前瞻性分析,以进行方案评估。这些患者在发生转移性疾病之前和之后接受的先前的全身治疗,以及这些治疗与正式机构方案的关联,被制成表格。在这个分析中,只考虑了药物的特性,而没有考虑剂量或治疗计划。226例患者中189例信息完整。结果:在本研究评估的189例患者中,135例(71%)在转诊到国家癌症研究所之前接受了某种形式的全身治疗。在发生转移性疾病之前,80名患者接受了25种不同的全身治疗,包括23种不同的药物。在转移性疾病发生后,53名患者接受了57种不同的全身和局部治疗,包括37种不同的药物。在切除所有转移部位后,23例患者接受了9种不同的全身辅助治疗。总的来说,这些患者接受了78种不同的全身治疗。每组的大多数治疗都没有正式的机构方案。结论:这项研究表明,大量的药物和不同的药物组合目前被用于转移性黑色素瘤发生前后的患者,而且经常不在批准的机构方案范围内。这些结果表明,需要在前瞻性方案中对治疗进行更正式的评估,并对黑色素瘤患者的治疗进行更大的标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A survey of treatments used in patients with metastatic melanoma: analysis of 189 patients referred to the National Cancer Institute.

Background: Few effective treatments exist for patients with metastatic melanoma. The United States Food and Drug Administration has approved the use of interferon alfa-2b after the resection of locoregional disease, and dacarbazine or interleukin-2 for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma beyond the locoregional area, although many additional agents and combinations of agents are currently in use.

Methods: Between January 1997 and June 1998, the Surgery Branch of the National Cancer Institute conducted a prospective analysis of 226 consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma referred for protocol evaluation. The previous systemic treatments these patients received both before and after the development of metastatic disease were tabulated, along with the association of these treatments with formal institutional protocols. Only the identity of the agents and not the dose or the schedule of treatments was considered in this analysis. Complete information could be obtained from 189 of the 226 patients.

Results: Of the 189 patients evaluated for this study, 135 (71%) received some form of systemic therapy before referral to the National Cancer Institute. Before the development of metastatic disease, 80 patients were administered 25 different systemic treatments, including 23 different agents. After the development of metastatic disease, 53 patients were administered 57 different systemic and regional treatments, including 37 different agents. After the resection of all metastatic sites, 23 patients were administered nine different systemic adjuvant treatments. Overall, 78 different systemic treatments were administered to these patients. The majority of treatments in each group were not associated with formal institutional protocols.

Conclusions: This study has demonstrated that a large number of agents and different combinations of agents are currently being administered to patients before and after the development of metastatic melanoma, and frequently not within the context of an approved institutional protocol. These results indicate a need for more formal evaluation of treatments in prospective protocols and greater standardization of the treatment of patients with melanoma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tumor-induced dysfunction in interleukin-2 production and interleukin-2 receptor signaling: a mechanism of immune escape. Expanding the indications for surgery and adjuvant interleukin-2-based immunotherapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Long-term follow-up of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with intravenous recombinant interleukin-2 in Europe. The role of interleukin-2 in the management of stage IV melanoma: the EORTC melanoma cooperative group program. Overview of interleukin-2 inhalation therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1