精神分裂症患者注意缺陷的神经生理机制。

B D Schwartz, W J Evans
{"title":"精神分裂症患者注意缺陷的神经生理机制。","authors":"B D Schwartz,&nbsp;W J Evans","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite advances in the pharmacologic treatment of schizophrenia, the neurophysiologic mechanism(s) of disordered attention in schizophrenia remain elusive.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of the present study was to assess specific components of attention, including disengagement, movement, re-engagement, and the inhibitory processes involved their control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen chronic schizophrenics from the inpatient and outpatient units of the Veterans Administration Medical Center (New Orleans, LA) and thirteen normal control subjects were administered a saccadic eye movements task. Saccade latency was measured in the presence of contra-lateral distracter stimuli that preceded the target onset (Distracter-before), followed the target onset (Distracter - after) or in the absence of a distracter (No-distracter). In order to assess the interactive process of fixation disengagement and target selection, fixation was either offset before the target (Gap) or it remained on in the presence of the target (Overlap).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed that saccadic latency in patients with schizophrenia is prolonged to a greater extent than in normal control subjects in the presence of distracter stimuli. Patients with schizophrenia are also characterized by a greater percentage of error saccades directed to the distracter, and require a longer latency to \"issue\" corrective saccades following error saccades.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that patients with schizophrenia are required to invoke volitional control under distracter conditions, whereas normal control subjects require minimal volitional control. The results are interpreted in terms of the inhibitory mechanisms that regulate attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":79516,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology","volume":"12 4","pages":"207-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neurophysiologic mechanisms of attention deficits in schizophrenia.\",\"authors\":\"B D Schwartz,&nbsp;W J Evans\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite advances in the pharmacologic treatment of schizophrenia, the neurophysiologic mechanism(s) of disordered attention in schizophrenia remain elusive.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of the present study was to assess specific components of attention, including disengagement, movement, re-engagement, and the inhibitory processes involved their control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen chronic schizophrenics from the inpatient and outpatient units of the Veterans Administration Medical Center (New Orleans, LA) and thirteen normal control subjects were administered a saccadic eye movements task. Saccade latency was measured in the presence of contra-lateral distracter stimuli that preceded the target onset (Distracter-before), followed the target onset (Distracter - after) or in the absence of a distracter (No-distracter). In order to assess the interactive process of fixation disengagement and target selection, fixation was either offset before the target (Gap) or it remained on in the presence of the target (Overlap).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed that saccadic latency in patients with schizophrenia is prolonged to a greater extent than in normal control subjects in the presence of distracter stimuli. Patients with schizophrenia are also characterized by a greater percentage of error saccades directed to the distracter, and require a longer latency to \\\"issue\\\" corrective saccades following error saccades.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that patients with schizophrenia are required to invoke volitional control under distracter conditions, whereas normal control subjects require minimal volitional control. The results are interpreted in terms of the inhibitory mechanisms that regulate attention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"207-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管精神分裂症的药物治疗取得了进展,但精神分裂症患者注意力障碍的神经生理机制仍不清楚。目的:本研究的目的是评估注意力的具体组成部分,包括脱离、运动、再投入以及涉及它们控制的抑制过程。方法:对新奥尔良退伍军人医疗中心住院和门诊的13名慢性精神分裂症患者和13名正常对照者进行跳眼运动任务。眼跳潜伏期是在目标开始前(分心物之前)、目标开始后(分心物之后)或没有分心物时(无分心物)存在对侧分心物刺激时测量的。为了评估注视脱离和目标选择的相互作用过程,注视在目标出现之前被偏移(Gap)或在目标出现时保持注视(Overlap)。结果:重复测量方差分析显示,在干扰物刺激下,精神分裂症患者的跳眼潜伏期比正常对照者延长得更大。精神分裂症患者的另一个特点是错误扫视指向干扰物的比例更高,并且在错误扫视之后需要更长的潜伏期来“发出”纠正性扫视。结论:研究结果表明,精神分裂症患者需要在干扰条件下调用意志控制,而正常对照受试者需要最小的意志控制。研究结果被解释为调节注意力的抑制机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neurophysiologic mechanisms of attention deficits in schizophrenia.

Background: Despite advances in the pharmacologic treatment of schizophrenia, the neurophysiologic mechanism(s) of disordered attention in schizophrenia remain elusive.

Objective: The goal of the present study was to assess specific components of attention, including disengagement, movement, re-engagement, and the inhibitory processes involved their control.

Methods: Thirteen chronic schizophrenics from the inpatient and outpatient units of the Veterans Administration Medical Center (New Orleans, LA) and thirteen normal control subjects were administered a saccadic eye movements task. Saccade latency was measured in the presence of contra-lateral distracter stimuli that preceded the target onset (Distracter-before), followed the target onset (Distracter - after) or in the absence of a distracter (No-distracter). In order to assess the interactive process of fixation disengagement and target selection, fixation was either offset before the target (Gap) or it remained on in the presence of the target (Overlap).

Results: Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed that saccadic latency in patients with schizophrenia is prolonged to a greater extent than in normal control subjects in the presence of distracter stimuli. Patients with schizophrenia are also characterized by a greater percentage of error saccades directed to the distracter, and require a longer latency to "issue" corrective saccades following error saccades.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that patients with schizophrenia are required to invoke volitional control under distracter conditions, whereas normal control subjects require minimal volitional control. The results are interpreted in terms of the inhibitory mechanisms that regulate attention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reorientation of attention in Huntington disease. A multivariate classification study of attentional orienting in patients with right hemisphere lesions. Hypersexuality after pallidal surgery in Parkinson disease. Misdiagnosis of schizophrenia in a patient with psychotic symptoms. Cerebral blood flow changes in depressed patients after treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: evidence of individual variability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1