悬而未决:患者对主要/次要界面护理的看法。

C Preston, F Cheater, R Baker, H Hearnshaw
{"title":"悬而未决:患者对主要/次要界面护理的看法。","authors":"C Preston,&nbsp;F Cheater,&nbsp;R Baker,&nbsp;H Hearnshaw","doi":"10.1136/qshc.8.1.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To discover the views of patients about their experiences across the interface between primary and secondary health care, including referral from general practitioners, outpatient and inpatient care, discharge, and aftercare.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative study involving individual and focus group interviews of patients and interviews of carers.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>33 patients who had attended at least one outpatient appointment or had been an inpatient between two and four months previously, and eight carers of patients with chronic conditions.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Three acute hospitals and one community health service in Leicestershire.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Common themes in the views of patients and carers towards their experiences of care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five themes emerged. The first four were: \"getting in\" (access to appropriate care), \"fitting in\" (orientation of care to the patient's requirements), \"knowing what's going on\" (provision of information), and \"continuity\" (continuity of staff and coordination and communication among professionals). The fifth theme was \"limbo\" (difficulty in making progress through the system), which was influenced by failures in care in relation to the other four themes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The concept of progress is central to patients' views of care. It involves both progress through the healthcare system and progress towards recovery or adjustment to an altered health state. Patients' views on how well they progress through the healthcare system may be an appropriate indicator for monitoring health service performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":20773,"journal":{"name":"Quality in health care : QHC","volume":"8 1","pages":"16-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/qshc.8.1.16","citationCount":"165","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left in limbo: patients' views on care across the primary/secondary interface.\",\"authors\":\"C Preston,&nbsp;F Cheater,&nbsp;R Baker,&nbsp;H Hearnshaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/qshc.8.1.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To discover the views of patients about their experiences across the interface between primary and secondary health care, including referral from general practitioners, outpatient and inpatient care, discharge, and aftercare.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative study involving individual and focus group interviews of patients and interviews of carers.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>33 patients who had attended at least one outpatient appointment or had been an inpatient between two and four months previously, and eight carers of patients with chronic conditions.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Three acute hospitals and one community health service in Leicestershire.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Common themes in the views of patients and carers towards their experiences of care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five themes emerged. The first four were: \\\"getting in\\\" (access to appropriate care), \\\"fitting in\\\" (orientation of care to the patient's requirements), \\\"knowing what's going on\\\" (provision of information), and \\\"continuity\\\" (continuity of staff and coordination and communication among professionals). The fifth theme was \\\"limbo\\\" (difficulty in making progress through the system), which was influenced by failures in care in relation to the other four themes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The concept of progress is central to patients' views of care. It involves both progress through the healthcare system and progress towards recovery or adjustment to an altered health state. Patients' views on how well they progress through the healthcare system may be an appropriate indicator for monitoring health service performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality in health care : QHC\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"16-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/qshc.8.1.16\",\"citationCount\":\"165\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality in health care : QHC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.8.1.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in health care : QHC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.8.1.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 165

摘要

目的:了解患者对他们在初级和二级卫生保健之间的体验的看法,包括全科医生的转诊、门诊和住院护理、出院和术后护理。设计:一项定性研究,包括对患者和护理人员的个人和焦点小组访谈。研究对象:33名至少参加过一次门诊预约或在2至4个月前住院的患者,以及8名慢性疾病患者的护理人员。环境:莱斯特郡的三家急症医院和一家社区卫生服务机构。主要结果测量:患者和护理人员对其护理经历的看法的共同主题。结果:出现了五个主题。前四项是:“进入”(获得适当的护理),“适应”(根据患者的需求进行护理),“了解正在发生的事情”(提供信息),以及“连续性”(工作人员的连续性以及专业人员之间的协调和沟通)。第五个主题是“limbo”(在系统中取得进展的困难),它受到与其他四个主题相关的护理失败的影响。结论:进步的概念是患者对护理的看法的核心。它既包括通过卫生保健系统取得的进展,也包括朝着恢复或适应改变的健康状态取得的进展。患者对他们在医疗保健系统中的进展情况的看法可能是监测医疗服务绩效的适当指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Left in limbo: patients' views on care across the primary/secondary interface.

Objectives: To discover the views of patients about their experiences across the interface between primary and secondary health care, including referral from general practitioners, outpatient and inpatient care, discharge, and aftercare.

Design: A qualitative study involving individual and focus group interviews of patients and interviews of carers.

Subjects: 33 patients who had attended at least one outpatient appointment or had been an inpatient between two and four months previously, and eight carers of patients with chronic conditions.

Setting: Three acute hospitals and one community health service in Leicestershire.

Main outcome measures: Common themes in the views of patients and carers towards their experiences of care.

Results: Five themes emerged. The first four were: "getting in" (access to appropriate care), "fitting in" (orientation of care to the patient's requirements), "knowing what's going on" (provision of information), and "continuity" (continuity of staff and coordination and communication among professionals). The fifth theme was "limbo" (difficulty in making progress through the system), which was influenced by failures in care in relation to the other four themes.

Conclusions: The concept of progress is central to patients' views of care. It involves both progress through the healthcare system and progress towards recovery or adjustment to an altered health state. Patients' views on how well they progress through the healthcare system may be an appropriate indicator for monitoring health service performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Engaging patients in decisions: a challenge to health care delivery and public health. The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments. Preferences and understanding their effects on health. Evidence-based patient empowerment. Performance management at the crossroads in the NHS: don't go into the red.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1