[金黄色葡萄球菌产生的葡萄球菌肠毒素免疫测定试剂盒的比较]。

T M Pan, Y L Yu, S I Chiu, S S Lin
{"title":"[金黄色葡萄球菌产生的葡萄球菌肠毒素免疫测定试剂盒的比较]。","authors":"T M Pan,&nbsp;Y L Yu,&nbsp;S I Chiu,&nbsp;S S Lin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Four commercial kits, SET-RPLA, RIDASCREEN, SET-EIA, and TECRA, were compared for the efficiency of detecting staphylococcal enterotoxins (SE). There was no non-specific reaction for detection of SE produced by 21 Staphylococcus aureus strains from 5 outbreaks of food poisoning using SET-RPLA, SET-EIA and TECRA kits. The background of the results of RIDASCREEN kit was high and non-specific reactions were present in some strains.</p><p><strong>In conclusion: </strong>(i) TECRA kit is suggested to be used for screening SE producing strains; (ii) SET-RPLA and RIDASCREEN kits are suitable for epidemiological investigation of SE types, but the lack of ability for detecting SEE, long time required for testing with SET-RPLA kit and high background when using RIDASCREEN kit must be overcome; and (iii) because of the complicated test procedures and the lack of ability for detecting SEE, the practicality of SET-EIA kit in screening and epidemiological research purposes is low.</p>","PeriodicalId":24009,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua Minguo wei sheng wu ji mian yi xue za zhi = Chinese journal of microbiology and immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Comparison of immunoassay kits for detection of staphylococcal enterotoxins produced by Staphylococcus aureus].\",\"authors\":\"T M Pan,&nbsp;Y L Yu,&nbsp;S I Chiu,&nbsp;S S Lin\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Four commercial kits, SET-RPLA, RIDASCREEN, SET-EIA, and TECRA, were compared for the efficiency of detecting staphylococcal enterotoxins (SE). There was no non-specific reaction for detection of SE produced by 21 Staphylococcus aureus strains from 5 outbreaks of food poisoning using SET-RPLA, SET-EIA and TECRA kits. The background of the results of RIDASCREEN kit was high and non-specific reactions were present in some strains.</p><p><strong>In conclusion: </strong>(i) TECRA kit is suggested to be used for screening SE producing strains; (ii) SET-RPLA and RIDASCREEN kits are suitable for epidemiological investigation of SE types, but the lack of ability for detecting SEE, long time required for testing with SET-RPLA kit and high background when using RIDASCREEN kit must be overcome; and (iii) because of the complicated test procedures and the lack of ability for detecting SEE, the practicality of SET-EIA kit in screening and epidemiological research purposes is low.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhonghua Minguo wei sheng wu ji mian yi xue za zhi = Chinese journal of microbiology and immunology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhonghua Minguo wei sheng wu ji mian yi xue za zhi = Chinese journal of microbiology and immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua Minguo wei sheng wu ji mian yi xue za zhi = Chinese journal of microbiology and immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

未标记:比较了四种商用试剂盒SET-RPLA、RIDASCREEN、SET-EIA和TECRA检测葡萄球菌肠毒素(SE)的效率。采用SET-RPLA、SET-EIA和TECRA试剂盒检测5起食物中毒事件中21株金黄色葡萄球菌产生的SE均无非特异性反应。RIDASCREEN试剂盒检测结果背景较高,部分菌株存在非特异性反应。综上所述:(1)推荐使用TECRA试剂盒筛选产SE菌株;(ii) SET-RPLA和RIDASCREEN试剂盒适用于SE类型的流行病学调查,但必须克服SET-RPLA试剂盒检测SEE能力不足、检测时间长、使用RIDASCREEN试剂盒本底高等问题;(三)由于检测程序复杂,缺乏检测SEE的能力,SET-EIA试剂盒在筛查和流行病学研究方面的实用性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Comparison of immunoassay kits for detection of staphylococcal enterotoxins produced by Staphylococcus aureus].

Unlabelled: Four commercial kits, SET-RPLA, RIDASCREEN, SET-EIA, and TECRA, were compared for the efficiency of detecting staphylococcal enterotoxins (SE). There was no non-specific reaction for detection of SE produced by 21 Staphylococcus aureus strains from 5 outbreaks of food poisoning using SET-RPLA, SET-EIA and TECRA kits. The background of the results of RIDASCREEN kit was high and non-specific reactions were present in some strains.

In conclusion: (i) TECRA kit is suggested to be used for screening SE producing strains; (ii) SET-RPLA and RIDASCREEN kits are suitable for epidemiological investigation of SE types, but the lack of ability for detecting SEE, long time required for testing with SET-RPLA kit and high background when using RIDASCREEN kit must be overcome; and (iii) because of the complicated test procedures and the lack of ability for detecting SEE, the practicality of SET-EIA kit in screening and epidemiological research purposes is low.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Studies on the serological cross-reaction between dengue and Japanese encephalitis. Evaluation of CLO test and polymerase chain reaction for biopsy-dependent diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Purification and characterization of a 94 KD high molecular weight allergen from house dust mite, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus. Population cell differentiation of Serratia marcescens on agar surface and in broth culture. [Detection of neutralizing antibodies to Japanese encephalitis virus by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1