{"title":"环孢素药物替代的问题:对患者管理的影响。","authors":"M R Bartucci","doi":"10.7182/prtr.1.9.3.37u315q858u8307x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Substantial improvements in short-term and long-term outcomes for kidney transplant recipients have resulted from better use of existing immunosuppressive agents and newer treatment options. Calcineurin inhibitors (e.g., cyclosporine and tacrolimus) remain the foundation of immunosuppressive therapy. These agents are considered critical-dose drugs because of their narrow therapeutic range, variable pharmacokinetics, formulation-dependent bioavailability, and negative clinical consequences of underdosing or overdosing. With the recent introduction of a new cyclosporine formulation, concern exists that current bioequivalence guidelines for generic approval may not provide adequate assessment of the safety and efficacy of critical-dose drugs. Transplant experts at 2 recent conferences recommended more rigorous criteria for bioequivalence testing of critical-dose drugs and adoption of consistent drug substitution practices. Additional recommendations included specifying the intended formulation and instituting appropriate monitoring whenever formulations are switched. A summary of the outcomes of these conferences and practice implications for transplant coordinators is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":79507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of transplant coordination : official publication of the North American Transplant Coordinators Organization (NATCO)","volume":"9 3","pages":"137-42; quiz 143-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Issues in cyclosporine drug substitution: implications for patient management.\",\"authors\":\"M R Bartucci\",\"doi\":\"10.7182/prtr.1.9.3.37u315q858u8307x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Substantial improvements in short-term and long-term outcomes for kidney transplant recipients have resulted from better use of existing immunosuppressive agents and newer treatment options. Calcineurin inhibitors (e.g., cyclosporine and tacrolimus) remain the foundation of immunosuppressive therapy. These agents are considered critical-dose drugs because of their narrow therapeutic range, variable pharmacokinetics, formulation-dependent bioavailability, and negative clinical consequences of underdosing or overdosing. With the recent introduction of a new cyclosporine formulation, concern exists that current bioequivalence guidelines for generic approval may not provide adequate assessment of the safety and efficacy of critical-dose drugs. Transplant experts at 2 recent conferences recommended more rigorous criteria for bioequivalence testing of critical-dose drugs and adoption of consistent drug substitution practices. Additional recommendations included specifying the intended formulation and instituting appropriate monitoring whenever formulations are switched. A summary of the outcomes of these conferences and practice implications for transplant coordinators is discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of transplant coordination : official publication of the North American Transplant Coordinators Organization (NATCO)\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"137-42; quiz 143-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of transplant coordination : official publication of the North American Transplant Coordinators Organization (NATCO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7182/prtr.1.9.3.37u315q858u8307x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of transplant coordination : official publication of the North American Transplant Coordinators Organization (NATCO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7182/prtr.1.9.3.37u315q858u8307x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Issues in cyclosporine drug substitution: implications for patient management.
Substantial improvements in short-term and long-term outcomes for kidney transplant recipients have resulted from better use of existing immunosuppressive agents and newer treatment options. Calcineurin inhibitors (e.g., cyclosporine and tacrolimus) remain the foundation of immunosuppressive therapy. These agents are considered critical-dose drugs because of their narrow therapeutic range, variable pharmacokinetics, formulation-dependent bioavailability, and negative clinical consequences of underdosing or overdosing. With the recent introduction of a new cyclosporine formulation, concern exists that current bioequivalence guidelines for generic approval may not provide adequate assessment of the safety and efficacy of critical-dose drugs. Transplant experts at 2 recent conferences recommended more rigorous criteria for bioequivalence testing of critical-dose drugs and adoption of consistent drug substitution practices. Additional recommendations included specifying the intended formulation and instituting appropriate monitoring whenever formulations are switched. A summary of the outcomes of these conferences and practice implications for transplant coordinators is discussed.