澳大利亚大学引入“直接入学”助产学课程:问题、神话和合作需求

RM MSc (Midwifery) Nicky Leap (Senior Research Fellow)
{"title":"澳大利亚大学引入“直接入学”助产学课程:问题、神话和合作需求","authors":"RM MSc (Midwifery) Nicky Leap (Senior Research Fellow)","doi":"10.1016/S1031-170X(99)80014-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper identifies some of the issues within the debate regarding the introduction of “direct entry’ midwifery education in Australia. It addresses questions that have been raised around terminology; the current midwifery education system; whether midwives also need to be nurses; how nurses who want to become midwives might enter the same programme with recognition of prior learning; and whether ‘direct entry’ midwifery education should become a mainstream option. A case is made for a collaborative initiative to consider all aspects of developing a national framework for Bachelor of Midwifery programmes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77020,"journal":{"name":"Australian College of Midwives Incorporated journal","volume":"12 2","pages":"Pages 11-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1031-170X(99)80014-2","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The introduction of ‘direct entry’ midwifery courses in Australian universities: Issues, myths and a need for collaboration\",\"authors\":\"RM MSc (Midwifery) Nicky Leap (Senior Research Fellow)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1031-170X(99)80014-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper identifies some of the issues within the debate regarding the introduction of “direct entry’ midwifery education in Australia. It addresses questions that have been raised around terminology; the current midwifery education system; whether midwives also need to be nurses; how nurses who want to become midwives might enter the same programme with recognition of prior learning; and whether ‘direct entry’ midwifery education should become a mainstream option. A case is made for a collaborative initiative to consider all aspects of developing a national framework for Bachelor of Midwifery programmes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian College of Midwives Incorporated journal\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 11-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1031-170X(99)80014-2\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian College of Midwives Incorporated journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1031170X99800142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian College of Midwives Incorporated journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1031170X99800142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

本文确定了关于在澳大利亚引入“直接进入”助产教育的辩论中的一些问题。它解决了围绕术语提出的问题;现行助产教育制度;助产士是否也需要成为护士;想要成为助产士的护士如何在承认先前学习的情况下进入相同的课程;以及“直接入学”助产教育是否应该成为一种主流选择。提出了一项合作倡议,考虑制定助产学士学位方案国家框架的所有方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The introduction of ‘direct entry’ midwifery courses in Australian universities: Issues, myths and a need for collaboration

This paper identifies some of the issues within the debate regarding the introduction of “direct entry’ midwifery education in Australia. It addresses questions that have been raised around terminology; the current midwifery education system; whether midwives also need to be nurses; how nurses who want to become midwives might enter the same programme with recognition of prior learning; and whether ‘direct entry’ midwifery education should become a mainstream option. A case is made for a collaborative initiative to consider all aspects of developing a national framework for Bachelor of Midwifery programmes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Letters to the editor Executive officer's report Reflections of midwives who make a difference A comparison of crying patterns of 4-week-old babies and the effect of zinc supplement in mothers Linking Research and Practice in Midwifery a Guide to evidence-Based Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1