乳房x光检查看不见乳腺癌。

L M Foxcroft, E B Evans, H K Joshua, C Hirst
{"title":"乳房x光检查看不见乳腺癌。","authors":"L M Foxcroft,&nbsp;E B Evans,&nbsp;H K Joshua,&nbsp;C Hirst","doi":"10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01763.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A proportion of the cancers 'missed' at mammography are invisible even with the benefit of hindsight. The aim of the present study was to identify a group of women with proven breast cancer whose mammograms did not show a suspicious lesion even in retrospect (i.e. the truly mammographically occult cancers), and to compare them with mammogram-positive cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1757 breast cancers was diagnosed at the Wesley Breast Clinic's Screening or Diagnostic Services between July 1987 and August 1997. One hundred and twenty cases were identified where, after independent review by two of the authors, no mammographic abnormality could be found in the region where the cancer was subsequently found. These 120 cases were compared with 1548 cancers considered to have a lesion visible on mammography, whether benign, indeterminate, suspicious or malignant in appearance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 90% of the mammogram-negative cancers, a clinical abnormality led to further investigation, while the remainder were found incidentally on ultrasound. There were a higher proportion of dense breasts, and of women aged 40-49, in the mammogram-negative cancers than in the mammogram-positive cancers. The mammogram-negative cancers were of smaller size overall, but three of them were surprisingly large (7-11 cm). In both the mammogram-positive and -negative cancers approximately 60% were ductal invasive cancers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Where factors are present that make mammographically occult malignancy more likely (e.g. age 40-49 and dense breasts), women may be targeted for further investigation by other modalities. This is essential in the presence of a clinical abnormality.</p>","PeriodicalId":22494,"journal":{"name":"The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery","volume":"70 3","pages":"162-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01763.x","citationCount":"40","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breast cancers invisible on mammography.\",\"authors\":\"L M Foxcroft,&nbsp;E B Evans,&nbsp;H K Joshua,&nbsp;C Hirst\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01763.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A proportion of the cancers 'missed' at mammography are invisible even with the benefit of hindsight. The aim of the present study was to identify a group of women with proven breast cancer whose mammograms did not show a suspicious lesion even in retrospect (i.e. the truly mammographically occult cancers), and to compare them with mammogram-positive cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1757 breast cancers was diagnosed at the Wesley Breast Clinic's Screening or Diagnostic Services between July 1987 and August 1997. One hundred and twenty cases were identified where, after independent review by two of the authors, no mammographic abnormality could be found in the region where the cancer was subsequently found. These 120 cases were compared with 1548 cancers considered to have a lesion visible on mammography, whether benign, indeterminate, suspicious or malignant in appearance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 90% of the mammogram-negative cancers, a clinical abnormality led to further investigation, while the remainder were found incidentally on ultrasound. There were a higher proportion of dense breasts, and of women aged 40-49, in the mammogram-negative cancers than in the mammogram-positive cancers. The mammogram-negative cancers were of smaller size overall, but three of them were surprisingly large (7-11 cm). In both the mammogram-positive and -negative cancers approximately 60% were ductal invasive cancers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Where factors are present that make mammographically occult malignancy more likely (e.g. age 40-49 and dense breasts), women may be targeted for further investigation by other modalities. This is essential in the presence of a clinical abnormality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\"70 3\",\"pages\":\"162-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01763.x\",\"citationCount\":\"40\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01763.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01763.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

摘要

背景:即使事后看来,乳房x光检查“遗漏”的一部分癌症是看不见的。本研究的目的是确定一组确诊为乳腺癌的妇女,她们的乳房x光检查甚至在回顾时也没有显示出可疑的病变(即真正的乳房x光检查隐匿性癌症),并将其与乳房x光检查阳性的癌症进行比较。方法:1987年7月至1997年8月期间,共有1757例乳腺癌在韦斯利乳腺诊所的筛查或诊断服务中被诊断出来。在两位作者独立审查后,鉴定了120例病例,在随后发现癌症的区域没有发现乳房x光检查异常。这120例病例与1548例乳房x线摄影上可见病变的癌症进行了比较,无论是良性的、不确定的、可疑的还是恶性的。结果:在90%的乳房x光检查阴性的癌症中,临床异常导致进一步的检查,而其余的则是偶然在超声检查中发现的。在40-49岁的女性中,乳房密度高的乳房在乳房x光检查阴性的癌症中所占的比例高于乳房x光检查阳性的癌症。乳房x光检查阴性的肿瘤总体上较小,但其中3个出奇地大(7-11厘米)。在乳房x光检查阳性和阴性的癌症中,大约60%是导管浸润性癌症。结论:如果存在使乳房x线检查中隐匿性恶性肿瘤更可能发生的因素(例如,年龄在40-49岁之间,乳房致密),则可以针对女性进行其他方式的进一步调查。这在出现临床异常时是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Breast cancers invisible on mammography.

Background: A proportion of the cancers 'missed' at mammography are invisible even with the benefit of hindsight. The aim of the present study was to identify a group of women with proven breast cancer whose mammograms did not show a suspicious lesion even in retrospect (i.e. the truly mammographically occult cancers), and to compare them with mammogram-positive cancers.

Methods: A total of 1757 breast cancers was diagnosed at the Wesley Breast Clinic's Screening or Diagnostic Services between July 1987 and August 1997. One hundred and twenty cases were identified where, after independent review by two of the authors, no mammographic abnormality could be found in the region where the cancer was subsequently found. These 120 cases were compared with 1548 cancers considered to have a lesion visible on mammography, whether benign, indeterminate, suspicious or malignant in appearance.

Results: In 90% of the mammogram-negative cancers, a clinical abnormality led to further investigation, while the remainder were found incidentally on ultrasound. There were a higher proportion of dense breasts, and of women aged 40-49, in the mammogram-negative cancers than in the mammogram-positive cancers. The mammogram-negative cancers were of smaller size overall, but three of them were surprisingly large (7-11 cm). In both the mammogram-positive and -negative cancers approximately 60% were ductal invasive cancers.

Conclusions: Where factors are present that make mammographically occult malignancy more likely (e.g. age 40-49 and dense breasts), women may be targeted for further investigation by other modalities. This is essential in the presence of a clinical abnormality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hiatus. ELECTROSURGERY: A SHORT HISTORY1 EUTHANASIA: A POINT OF VIEW1 DISSEMINATED INTRAVASCULAR COAGULATION CADE A model for reflecting upon the ethical dilemma of hands-on teaching of surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1