1赫兹和20赫兹重复经颅磁刺激对抑郁症的认知影响:初步报告。

J T Little, T A Kimbrell, E M Wassermann, J Grafman, S Figueras, R T Dunn, A Danielson, J Repella, T Huggins, M S George, R M Post
{"title":"1赫兹和20赫兹重复经颅磁刺激对抑郁症的认知影响:初步报告。","authors":"J T Little,&nbsp;T A Kimbrell,&nbsp;E M Wassermann,&nbsp;J Grafman,&nbsp;S Figueras,&nbsp;R T Dunn,&nbsp;A Danielson,&nbsp;J Repella,&nbsp;T Huggins,&nbsp;M S George,&nbsp;R M Post","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the cognitive effects of daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) administered under the conditions of a treatment trial for major depression.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Although daily left dorsal prefrontal rTMS has improved mood in some patients with treatment-refractory depression, potential cognitive side effects of extended daily treatment have not been systematically studied.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In a randomized double-blind treatment study, 10 subjects (mean age, 42 +/- 15 years) with an episode of major depression received either 2 weeks of low-frequency (1 Hz) or high-frequency (20 Hz) rTMS (800 pulses, 20 trains over 20 minutes, 80% of motor threshold, 5 days per week) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and then were crossed over to the other treatment condition. Patients received cognitive testing at baseline and after the first and second weeks of low- or high-frequency rTMS, which was examined by repeated-measures ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 16 cognitive measures tested after 1 or 2 weeks of rTMS compared with baseline status, none showed deterioration, and the only significant main treatment effect indicated improvement on a list-recall test from pre- to post-rTMS after 1 week (p <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These preliminary data suggest no gross deleterious cognitive effects of 2 weeks of 1- or 20-Hz rTMS at 80% of motor threshold over the left prefrontal cortex. Further cognitive studies of the effects of rTMS at other parameters used in clinical trials for mood disorders remain to be undertaken.</p>","PeriodicalId":79516,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology","volume":"13 2","pages":"119-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive effects of 1- and 20-hertz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression: preliminary report.\",\"authors\":\"J T Little,&nbsp;T A Kimbrell,&nbsp;E M Wassermann,&nbsp;J Grafman,&nbsp;S Figueras,&nbsp;R T Dunn,&nbsp;A Danielson,&nbsp;J Repella,&nbsp;T Huggins,&nbsp;M S George,&nbsp;R M Post\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the cognitive effects of daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) administered under the conditions of a treatment trial for major depression.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Although daily left dorsal prefrontal rTMS has improved mood in some patients with treatment-refractory depression, potential cognitive side effects of extended daily treatment have not been systematically studied.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In a randomized double-blind treatment study, 10 subjects (mean age, 42 +/- 15 years) with an episode of major depression received either 2 weeks of low-frequency (1 Hz) or high-frequency (20 Hz) rTMS (800 pulses, 20 trains over 20 minutes, 80% of motor threshold, 5 days per week) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and then were crossed over to the other treatment condition. Patients received cognitive testing at baseline and after the first and second weeks of low- or high-frequency rTMS, which was examined by repeated-measures ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 16 cognitive measures tested after 1 or 2 weeks of rTMS compared with baseline status, none showed deterioration, and the only significant main treatment effect indicated improvement on a list-recall test from pre- to post-rTMS after 1 week (p <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These preliminary data suggest no gross deleterious cognitive effects of 2 weeks of 1- or 20-Hz rTMS at 80% of motor threshold over the left prefrontal cortex. Further cognitive studies of the effects of rTMS at other parameters used in clinical trials for mood disorders remain to be undertaken.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"119-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨在重度抑郁症治疗试验条件下,每日重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对认知的影响。背景:尽管每日左背前额叶rTMS可改善一些难治性抑郁症患者的情绪,但延长每日治疗的潜在认知副作用尚未得到系统研究。方法:在一项随机双盲治疗研究中,10名重度抑郁症患者(平均年龄42 +/- 15岁)接受为期2周的低频(1hz)或高频(20hz) rTMS(800次脉冲,20分钟20次,80%运动阈值,每周5天)的左背外侧前额皮质,然后交叉到另一种治疗条件。患者在基线和低或高频rTMS的第一周和第二周后接受认知测试,并通过重复测量方差分析进行检验。结果:在rTMS 1或2周后测试的16项认知测量与基线状态相比,没有显示出恶化,唯一显著的主要治疗效果表明,1周后从rTMS前到rTMS后的列表回忆测试有所改善(p结论:这些初步数据表明,在左侧前额叶皮层80%的运动阈值处,1或20 hz rTMS 2周没有明显的有害认知影响。在情绪障碍临床试验中,rTMS对其他参数的影响仍有待进一步的认知研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cognitive effects of 1- and 20-hertz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression: preliminary report.

Objective: To determine the cognitive effects of daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) administered under the conditions of a treatment trial for major depression.

Background: Although daily left dorsal prefrontal rTMS has improved mood in some patients with treatment-refractory depression, potential cognitive side effects of extended daily treatment have not been systematically studied.

Method: In a randomized double-blind treatment study, 10 subjects (mean age, 42 +/- 15 years) with an episode of major depression received either 2 weeks of low-frequency (1 Hz) or high-frequency (20 Hz) rTMS (800 pulses, 20 trains over 20 minutes, 80% of motor threshold, 5 days per week) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and then were crossed over to the other treatment condition. Patients received cognitive testing at baseline and after the first and second weeks of low- or high-frequency rTMS, which was examined by repeated-measures ANOVA.

Results: Of 16 cognitive measures tested after 1 or 2 weeks of rTMS compared with baseline status, none showed deterioration, and the only significant main treatment effect indicated improvement on a list-recall test from pre- to post-rTMS after 1 week (p <0.05).

Conclusions: These preliminary data suggest no gross deleterious cognitive effects of 2 weeks of 1- or 20-Hz rTMS at 80% of motor threshold over the left prefrontal cortex. Further cognitive studies of the effects of rTMS at other parameters used in clinical trials for mood disorders remain to be undertaken.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reorientation of attention in Huntington disease. A multivariate classification study of attentional orienting in patients with right hemisphere lesions. Hypersexuality after pallidal surgery in Parkinson disease. Misdiagnosis of schizophrenia in a patient with psychotic symptoms. Cerebral blood flow changes in depressed patients after treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: evidence of individual variability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1