听觉稳态反应的产生:线性度评估。

Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum Pub Date : 1999-01-01
R Santarelli, G Conti
{"title":"听觉稳态反应的产生:线性度评估。","authors":"R Santarelli,&nbsp;G Conti","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Auditory steady-state responses (SSRs) are believed to result from the superimposition of the middle latency responses (MLRs) evoked by individual stimuli. Our recent studies challenge this hypothesis in several regards. Surface-electrical recordings performed in 16 normal subjects showed that the prediction curves obtained by MLR linear addition failed to predict SSRs at rates other than 40 Hz. Amplitude and phase differences between actual and predicted responses point to the intervention of phenomena related to the recovery cycle of the neural networks underlying the SSR generation. A click train paradigm at a 40 Hz rate was utilized and an approximation to the response evoked by the last stimulus was obtained by an analytical handling. The most relevant feature of this response in comparison to the MLR was the appearance of an additional activity which could be related to the fast oscillations of auditory cortical neurons. Our findings suggest that the responses evoked by individual stimuli during steady-state stimulation change by increasing the repetition rate, thus contradicting the most widely accepted hypothesis of the MLR linear addition in the SSR generation.</p>","PeriodicalId":76517,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum","volume":"51 ","pages":"23-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generation of auditory steady-state responses: linearity assessment.\",\"authors\":\"R Santarelli,&nbsp;G Conti\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Auditory steady-state responses (SSRs) are believed to result from the superimposition of the middle latency responses (MLRs) evoked by individual stimuli. Our recent studies challenge this hypothesis in several regards. Surface-electrical recordings performed in 16 normal subjects showed that the prediction curves obtained by MLR linear addition failed to predict SSRs at rates other than 40 Hz. Amplitude and phase differences between actual and predicted responses point to the intervention of phenomena related to the recovery cycle of the neural networks underlying the SSR generation. A click train paradigm at a 40 Hz rate was utilized and an approximation to the response evoked by the last stimulus was obtained by an analytical handling. The most relevant feature of this response in comparison to the MLR was the appearance of an additional activity which could be related to the fast oscillations of auditory cortical neurons. Our findings suggest that the responses evoked by individual stimuli during steady-state stimulation change by increasing the repetition rate, thus contradicting the most widely accepted hypothesis of the MLR linear addition in the SSR generation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum\",\"volume\":\"51 \",\"pages\":\"23-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

听觉稳态反应(SSRs)被认为是个体刺激引起的中潜伏期反应(MLRs)叠加的结果。我们最近的研究在几个方面挑战了这一假设。对16名正常受试者进行的表面电记录显示,MLR线性相加所得的预测曲线无法预测除40 Hz外的ssr。实际响应和预测响应之间的振幅和相位差异表明,与SSR生成相关的神经网络恢复周期现象的干预。利用40 Hz频率的咔哒训练范式,通过解析处理得到了最后一次刺激引起的近似反应。与MLR相比,这种反应最相关的特征是出现了一种额外的活动,这可能与听觉皮层神经元的快速振荡有关。我们的研究结果表明,在稳态刺激中,个体刺激引起的反应会随着重复率的增加而变化,从而与SSR世代中最广泛接受的MLR线性增加的假设相矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Generation of auditory steady-state responses: linearity assessment.

Auditory steady-state responses (SSRs) are believed to result from the superimposition of the middle latency responses (MLRs) evoked by individual stimuli. Our recent studies challenge this hypothesis in several regards. Surface-electrical recordings performed in 16 normal subjects showed that the prediction curves obtained by MLR linear addition failed to predict SSRs at rates other than 40 Hz. Amplitude and phase differences between actual and predicted responses point to the intervention of phenomena related to the recovery cycle of the neural networks underlying the SSR generation. A click train paradigm at a 40 Hz rate was utilized and an approximation to the response evoked by the last stimulus was obtained by an analytical handling. The most relevant feature of this response in comparison to the MLR was the appearance of an additional activity which could be related to the fast oscillations of auditory cortical neurons. Our findings suggest that the responses evoked by individual stimuli during steady-state stimulation change by increasing the repetition rate, thus contradicting the most widely accepted hypothesis of the MLR linear addition in the SSR generation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Crises. Central auditory tests. Neuroanatomy of tinnitus. Clinical relevance of medial efferent auditory pathways. Selected management approaches to central auditory processing disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1