一个问题表,鼓励书面咨询问题。

Quality in health care : QHC Pub Date : 2000-03-01
C Cunningham, R Newton
{"title":"一个问题表,鼓励书面咨询问题。","authors":"C Cunningham,&nbsp;R Newton","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Problem: </strong>Interviews with parents and children attending a hospital paediatric neurology clinic indicated they had difficulties in asking questions during consultations.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To set up a process to enable parents and children to get the information they wanted.</p><p><strong>Background and setting: </strong>Two paediatric neurology clinics in separate hospitals in Greater Manchester, UK with a similar client group run by one consultant.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Various styles of question sheets were evaluated. The one that was chosen asked patients to write down questions and hand these to the doctor at the beginning of the consultation. Question sheets were given to all patients attending one clinic over a 13 week period.</p><p><strong>Strategies for change: </strong>Use of sheets: number of patients taking or refusing a sheet, with reasons for refusal, were recorded. Doctors noted those who handed questions sheets to them Satisfaction with sheets: patients completed a short feedback form after the consultation Effect on consultations: evaluated through interviews with the doctors.</p><p><strong>Effects of change: </strong>In total, 66 (41%) of the 162 patients offered the sheet declined: 14 had already prepared questions; eight being seen for the first time felt they did not know what to ask. Seventeen had used the sheet on a previous visit and did not need it again; 19 gave no reason; the rest said they had no questions. Seventy six (47%) patients produced a sheet in the consultation. Of those using the sheet, 64 (84%) liked it and 61 (80%) found it useful. Fifty two (68%) wished to use it at future consultations. The doctors reported that through questions articulated on the sheets many issues, fears, and misunderstandings emerged which otherwise would not have been identified. Concerns about increasing consultation time and clinical disruption did not materialize. In contrast, doctors reported patients to be taking more initiative and control, particularly on subsequent visits. None of these changes was noted in the comparison clinic.</p><p><strong>Lessons learnt: </strong>An attractive, clear question sheet proved a simple but effective intervention in the consultation. Parents felt empowered to take control. The approach may have wider applicability, but implementation requires staff training and support to ensure its continuing use; this ensures medical staff adjust to a new consultation format, and that clinic nurses see the value of the sheets and continue to provide them.</p>","PeriodicalId":20773,"journal":{"name":"Quality in health care : QHC","volume":"9 1","pages":"42-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1743498/pdf/v009p00042.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A question sheet to encourage written consultation questions.\",\"authors\":\"C Cunningham,&nbsp;R Newton\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Problem: </strong>Interviews with parents and children attending a hospital paediatric neurology clinic indicated they had difficulties in asking questions during consultations.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To set up a process to enable parents and children to get the information they wanted.</p><p><strong>Background and setting: </strong>Two paediatric neurology clinics in separate hospitals in Greater Manchester, UK with a similar client group run by one consultant.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Various styles of question sheets were evaluated. The one that was chosen asked patients to write down questions and hand these to the doctor at the beginning of the consultation. Question sheets were given to all patients attending one clinic over a 13 week period.</p><p><strong>Strategies for change: </strong>Use of sheets: number of patients taking or refusing a sheet, with reasons for refusal, were recorded. Doctors noted those who handed questions sheets to them Satisfaction with sheets: patients completed a short feedback form after the consultation Effect on consultations: evaluated through interviews with the doctors.</p><p><strong>Effects of change: </strong>In total, 66 (41%) of the 162 patients offered the sheet declined: 14 had already prepared questions; eight being seen for the first time felt they did not know what to ask. Seventeen had used the sheet on a previous visit and did not need it again; 19 gave no reason; the rest said they had no questions. Seventy six (47%) patients produced a sheet in the consultation. Of those using the sheet, 64 (84%) liked it and 61 (80%) found it useful. Fifty two (68%) wished to use it at future consultations. The doctors reported that through questions articulated on the sheets many issues, fears, and misunderstandings emerged which otherwise would not have been identified. Concerns about increasing consultation time and clinical disruption did not materialize. In contrast, doctors reported patients to be taking more initiative and control, particularly on subsequent visits. None of these changes was noted in the comparison clinic.</p><p><strong>Lessons learnt: </strong>An attractive, clear question sheet proved a simple but effective intervention in the consultation. Parents felt empowered to take control. The approach may have wider applicability, but implementation requires staff training and support to ensure its continuing use; this ensures medical staff adjust to a new consultation format, and that clinic nurses see the value of the sheets and continue to provide them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality in health care : QHC\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"42-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1743498/pdf/v009p00042.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality in health care : QHC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in health care : QHC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题:对在医院儿科神经病学诊所就诊的家长和儿童的采访表明,他们在咨询时难以提问。目的:建立一个过程,使家长和孩子得到他们想要的信息。背景和环境:两个儿科神经病学诊所在不同的医院在大曼彻斯特,英国有一个相似的客户群由一个顾问运行。设计:评估了各种类型的问题表。被选中的一项是要求病人写下问题,并在会诊开始时交给医生。在13周的时间里,所有在一家诊所就诊的患者都被发放了问题单。改变策略:床单的使用:记录接受或拒绝使用床单的患者人数,并记录拒绝的原因。医生记录了那些把问题单交给他们的人对问题单的满意度:患者在咨询后完成了一份简短的反馈表格:咨询效果:通过与医生的访谈来评估。改变的影响:162名患者中,总共有66名(41%)拒绝了这份表格:14名已经准备好了问题;第一次被人看见的小八觉得他们不知道该问什么。17个人在上次访问中用过这张被单,不需要再用了;19 .没有给出理由;其余的人说他们没有问题。76例(47%)患者在会诊时出示了单张。在使用这张纸的人中,64人(84%)喜欢它,61人(80%)认为它有用。52个国家(68%)希望在今后的协商中使用它。医生们报告说,通过表格上明确的问题,出现了许多原本不会被发现的问题、恐惧和误解。对增加咨询时间和临床中断的担忧没有实现。相比之下,医生报告说,病人更主动、更有控制力,尤其是在随后的就诊中。在比较诊所中没有发现这些变化。经验教训:一份吸引人的、清晰的问题单证明是一种简单但有效的咨询干预措施。父母们感到有能力控制局面。这一办法可能具有更广泛的适用性,但执行工作需要对工作人员进行培训和支助,以确保继续使用;这确保了医务人员适应新的咨询格式,诊所护士看到了床单的价值,并继续提供它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A question sheet to encourage written consultation questions.

Problem: Interviews with parents and children attending a hospital paediatric neurology clinic indicated they had difficulties in asking questions during consultations.

Aim: To set up a process to enable parents and children to get the information they wanted.

Background and setting: Two paediatric neurology clinics in separate hospitals in Greater Manchester, UK with a similar client group run by one consultant.

Design: Various styles of question sheets were evaluated. The one that was chosen asked patients to write down questions and hand these to the doctor at the beginning of the consultation. Question sheets were given to all patients attending one clinic over a 13 week period.

Strategies for change: Use of sheets: number of patients taking or refusing a sheet, with reasons for refusal, were recorded. Doctors noted those who handed questions sheets to them Satisfaction with sheets: patients completed a short feedback form after the consultation Effect on consultations: evaluated through interviews with the doctors.

Effects of change: In total, 66 (41%) of the 162 patients offered the sheet declined: 14 had already prepared questions; eight being seen for the first time felt they did not know what to ask. Seventeen had used the sheet on a previous visit and did not need it again; 19 gave no reason; the rest said they had no questions. Seventy six (47%) patients produced a sheet in the consultation. Of those using the sheet, 64 (84%) liked it and 61 (80%) found it useful. Fifty two (68%) wished to use it at future consultations. The doctors reported that through questions articulated on the sheets many issues, fears, and misunderstandings emerged which otherwise would not have been identified. Concerns about increasing consultation time and clinical disruption did not materialize. In contrast, doctors reported patients to be taking more initiative and control, particularly on subsequent visits. None of these changes was noted in the comparison clinic.

Lessons learnt: An attractive, clear question sheet proved a simple but effective intervention in the consultation. Parents felt empowered to take control. The approach may have wider applicability, but implementation requires staff training and support to ensure its continuing use; this ensures medical staff adjust to a new consultation format, and that clinic nurses see the value of the sheets and continue to provide them.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Engaging patients in decisions: a challenge to health care delivery and public health. The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments. Preferences and understanding their effects on health. Evidence-based patient empowerment. Performance management at the crossroads in the NHS: don't go into the red.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1