巴雷特食管的内镜随访:方案和意义。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica Pub Date : 2000-01-01
D De Looze
{"title":"巴雷特食管的内镜随访:方案和意义。","authors":"D De Looze","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of endoscopic surveillance in Barrett's esophagus is to detect dysplasia and to diagnose carcinoma in an early, treatable stage. Prospective trials that study the efficacy of a surveillance program in reducing mortality from esophageal adenocarcinoma are lacking. Retrospective studies have shown a significantly better outcome in patients with esophageal cancer that is detected during a surveillance program. Obviously, surveillance is only indicated for those patients fit enough to undergo esophagectomy if high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or malignancy is detected. There is no consensus upon what to do with HGD: some recommend esophagectomy when HGD is diagnosed, because an important proportion of these patients host an adenocarcinoma; others feel that histological proof of malignancy should be established before esophagectomy is proposed. Dysplasia is not a uniform process, causing sampling problems. Using a strict biopsy protocol is helpful to differentiate HGD from carcinoma, but contradictory results about this type of rigorous biopsy protocol have been published. Most groups propose four biopsy specimens, in a circular fashion, from every 2 cm of the Barrett-epithelium, with additional biopsies from any mucosal abnormality. Patients with long-segment Barrett's esophagus need endoscopic surveillance, even if they underwent antireflux surgery. At this moment there are not enough data to support a systematic surveillance of patients with short-segment's Barrett's esophagus. The following endoscopic strategy can be proposed. No dysplasia: surveillance every 2 years. Low-grade dysplasia: surveillance every year; in these cases it is recommended to repeat four-quadrant biopsies at 1 cm interval if numerous biopsies reveal dysplasia to detect foci of HGD/cancer. High-grade dysplasia: repeat immediately four-quadrant biopsies at 1 cm interval; if HGD is confirmed esophagectomy is advised to a patient with acceptable operative risk. Ablation therapy remains experimental.</p>","PeriodicalId":50942,"journal":{"name":"Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica","volume":"63 1","pages":"29-35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic follow-up of Barrett's esophagus: protocol and implications.\",\"authors\":\"D De Looze\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of endoscopic surveillance in Barrett's esophagus is to detect dysplasia and to diagnose carcinoma in an early, treatable stage. Prospective trials that study the efficacy of a surveillance program in reducing mortality from esophageal adenocarcinoma are lacking. Retrospective studies have shown a significantly better outcome in patients with esophageal cancer that is detected during a surveillance program. Obviously, surveillance is only indicated for those patients fit enough to undergo esophagectomy if high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or malignancy is detected. There is no consensus upon what to do with HGD: some recommend esophagectomy when HGD is diagnosed, because an important proportion of these patients host an adenocarcinoma; others feel that histological proof of malignancy should be established before esophagectomy is proposed. Dysplasia is not a uniform process, causing sampling problems. Using a strict biopsy protocol is helpful to differentiate HGD from carcinoma, but contradictory results about this type of rigorous biopsy protocol have been published. Most groups propose four biopsy specimens, in a circular fashion, from every 2 cm of the Barrett-epithelium, with additional biopsies from any mucosal abnormality. Patients with long-segment Barrett's esophagus need endoscopic surveillance, even if they underwent antireflux surgery. At this moment there are not enough data to support a systematic surveillance of patients with short-segment's Barrett's esophagus. The following endoscopic strategy can be proposed. No dysplasia: surveillance every 2 years. Low-grade dysplasia: surveillance every year; in these cases it is recommended to repeat four-quadrant biopsies at 1 cm interval if numerous biopsies reveal dysplasia to detect foci of HGD/cancer. High-grade dysplasia: repeat immediately four-quadrant biopsies at 1 cm interval; if HGD is confirmed esophagectomy is advised to a patient with acceptable operative risk. Ablation therapy remains experimental.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"29-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

巴雷特食管内镜监测的目的是发现不典型增生,并在早期诊断癌,可治疗的阶段。缺乏前瞻性试验来研究监测方案在降低食管癌死亡率方面的有效性。回顾性研究表明,在监测项目中检测到的食管癌患者的预后明显更好。显然,如果检测到高级别不典型增生(HGD)或恶性肿瘤,监测只适用于那些适合进行食管切除术的患者。对于如何治疗HGD还没有达成共识:一些人建议在诊断为HGD时进行食管切除术,因为这些患者中有很大一部分患有腺癌;另一些人则认为应在食管切除术前确定恶性肿瘤的组织学证据。发育不良不是一个统一的过程,导致抽样问题。使用严格的活检方案有助于区分HGD和癌,但关于这种严格的活检方案的矛盾结果已发表。大多数小组建议每2厘米从巴雷特上皮中取4个活检标本,以圆形方式取,并对任何粘膜异常进行额外活检。长段巴雷特食管患者需要内窥镜监测,即使他们接受了抗反流手术。目前还没有足够的数据支持对短段巴雷特食管患者进行系统监测。可以提出以下内窥镜策略。未见发育不良:每2年监测一次。低度发育不良:每年监测;在这种情况下,如果多次活检显示发育不良,建议每隔1cm重复四象限活检,以检测HGD/癌灶。高度发育不良:每隔1cm立即重复四象限活检;如果确诊HGD,建议患者在可接受的手术风险下行食管切除术。消融治疗仍处于实验阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endoscopic follow-up of Barrett's esophagus: protocol and implications.

The purpose of endoscopic surveillance in Barrett's esophagus is to detect dysplasia and to diagnose carcinoma in an early, treatable stage. Prospective trials that study the efficacy of a surveillance program in reducing mortality from esophageal adenocarcinoma are lacking. Retrospective studies have shown a significantly better outcome in patients with esophageal cancer that is detected during a surveillance program. Obviously, surveillance is only indicated for those patients fit enough to undergo esophagectomy if high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or malignancy is detected. There is no consensus upon what to do with HGD: some recommend esophagectomy when HGD is diagnosed, because an important proportion of these patients host an adenocarcinoma; others feel that histological proof of malignancy should be established before esophagectomy is proposed. Dysplasia is not a uniform process, causing sampling problems. Using a strict biopsy protocol is helpful to differentiate HGD from carcinoma, but contradictory results about this type of rigorous biopsy protocol have been published. Most groups propose four biopsy specimens, in a circular fashion, from every 2 cm of the Barrett-epithelium, with additional biopsies from any mucosal abnormality. Patients with long-segment Barrett's esophagus need endoscopic surveillance, even if they underwent antireflux surgery. At this moment there are not enough data to support a systematic surveillance of patients with short-segment's Barrett's esophagus. The following endoscopic strategy can be proposed. No dysplasia: surveillance every 2 years. Low-grade dysplasia: surveillance every year; in these cases it is recommended to repeat four-quadrant biopsies at 1 cm interval if numerous biopsies reveal dysplasia to detect foci of HGD/cancer. High-grade dysplasia: repeat immediately four-quadrant biopsies at 1 cm interval; if HGD is confirmed esophagectomy is advised to a patient with acceptable operative risk. Ablation therapy remains experimental.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica
Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica principally publishes peer-reviewed original manuscripts, reviews, letters to editors, book reviews and guidelines in the field of clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, including digestive oncology, digestive pathology, as well as nutrition. Pure animal or in vitro work will not be considered for publication in the Journal. Translational research papers (including sections of animal or in vitro work) are considered by the Journal if they have a clear relationship to or relevance for clinical hepato-gastroenterology (screening, disease mechanisms and/or new therapies). Case reports and clinical images will be accepted if they represent an important contribution to the description, the pathogenesis or the treatment of a specific gastroenterology or liver problem. The language of the Journal is English. Papers from any country will be considered for publication. Manuscripts submitted to the Journal should not have been published previously (in English or any other language), nor should they be under consideration for publication elsewhere. Unsolicited papers are peer-reviewed before it is decided whether they should be accepted, rejected, or returned for revision. Manuscripts that do not meet the presentation criteria (as indicated below) will be returned to the authors. Papers that go too far beyond the scope of the journal will be also returned to the authors by the editorial board generally within 2 weeks. The Journal reserves the right to edit the language of papers accepted for publication for clarity and correctness, and to make formal changes to ensure compliance with AGEB’s style. Authors have the opportunity to review such changes in the proofs.
期刊最新文献
A pilot randomized trial to study the success rate of early precut fistulotomy and its effect on radiation dose in patients with difficult biliary cannulation Hepatitis B virus vaccination and revaccination response in children diagnosed with coeliac disease : a multicentre prospective study. Diagnostic hepatitis C testing of people in treatment for substance use disorders in Belgium between 2011 and 2014 : a cross-sectional study. Acute liver graft cellular rejection after interferon-free antiviral treatment for HCV infection. Is there a risk? A warning about three cases. Comparison of the 48-week efficacy of Lamivudine plus Adefovir or Entecavir monotherapy in patients with HBeAg negative hepatitis following Lamivudine treatment failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1