远程手术中的人为因素:在局部操作辅助下视频和控制反馈的时间延迟和异步的影响。

J M Thompson, M P Ottensmeyer, T B Sheridan
{"title":"远程手术中的人为因素:在局部操作辅助下视频和控制反馈的时间延迟和异步的影响。","authors":"J M Thompson,&nbsp;M P Ottensmeyer,&nbsp;T B Sheridan","doi":"10.1089/107830299312096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper presents the results of experiments examining the performance of a telesurgeon and an assistant local to the patient performing simulated laparoscopic tasks under a variety of time-delay conditions. Of particular interest is a comparison between the surgeon provided with audio/video and force feedbck synchronously with various time delays, and the surgeon performing asynchronously, where video is delayed relative to force feedback. These conditions are relevant since current telecommunication systems have limited bandwidth, and video signals must be compressed for efficient transmission. This produces a time lag between the video camera and the surgeon's monitor, Force feedback and position commands from a surgical teleoperator require much lower bandwidth, and can be transmitted in near-real time. In the first of two series of experiments, two laparoscopic training tasks were performed under different time-delay conditions, with force and video feedback delayed by equal amounts. In the second series, using the same tasks, the force feedback was more immediate, while the video delay lagged by the time required for compression and decompression. In both experiments, there were various role assignments in terms of whether the telesurgeon or the assistant controlled the laparoscope and/or the various surgical tools required. The three most striking results are that (1) nontrivial time delays significantly degraded the performance of the surgical tasks, (2) asynchronous force feedback resulted in significantly faster task-performance than did synchronous performance when the surgeon operated the laparoscopic tools, and (3) there was no difference between synchrony and asynchrony when the remote surgeon operated the laparoscope and gave commands while the local assistant operated the surgical tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":79734,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":"5 2","pages":"129-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/107830299312096","citationCount":"64","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human factors in telesurgery: effects of time delay and asynchrony in video and control feedback with local manipulative assistance.\",\"authors\":\"J M Thompson,&nbsp;M P Ottensmeyer,&nbsp;T B Sheridan\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/107830299312096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper presents the results of experiments examining the performance of a telesurgeon and an assistant local to the patient performing simulated laparoscopic tasks under a variety of time-delay conditions. Of particular interest is a comparison between the surgeon provided with audio/video and force feedbck synchronously with various time delays, and the surgeon performing asynchronously, where video is delayed relative to force feedback. These conditions are relevant since current telecommunication systems have limited bandwidth, and video signals must be compressed for efficient transmission. This produces a time lag between the video camera and the surgeon's monitor, Force feedback and position commands from a surgical teleoperator require much lower bandwidth, and can be transmitted in near-real time. In the first of two series of experiments, two laparoscopic training tasks were performed under different time-delay conditions, with force and video feedback delayed by equal amounts. In the second series, using the same tasks, the force feedback was more immediate, while the video delay lagged by the time required for compression and decompression. In both experiments, there were various role assignments in terms of whether the telesurgeon or the assistant controlled the laparoscope and/or the various surgical tools required. The three most striking results are that (1) nontrivial time delays significantly degraded the performance of the surgical tasks, (2) asynchronous force feedback resulted in significantly faster task-performance than did synchronous performance when the surgeon operated the laparoscopic tools, and (3) there was no difference between synchrony and asynchrony when the remote surgeon operated the laparoscope and gave commands while the local assistant operated the surgical tools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"129-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/107830299312096\",\"citationCount\":\"64\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/107830299312096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/107830299312096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

摘要

本文介绍了在各种延时条件下,远程外科医生和当地助理对患者执行模拟腹腔镜任务的实验结果。我们特别感兴趣的是在同步提供音频/视频和力反馈的外科医生与不同时间延迟的外科医生之间进行比较,其中视频相对于力反馈延迟。这些条件是相关的,因为目前的电信系统带宽有限,视频信号必须压缩才能有效传输。这在摄像机和外科医生的监视器之间产生了时间滞后,来自外科手术远程操作员的力反馈和位置命令需要更低的带宽,并且可以近乎实时地传输。在两个系列实验的第一个实验中,在不同的延迟条件下进行两个腹腔镜训练任务,力和视频反馈延迟量相等。在第二个系列中,使用相同的任务,力反馈更直接,而视频延迟由于压缩和解压所需的时间而滞后。在两个实验中,都有不同的角色分配,比如远程外科医生或助手是否控制腹腔镜和/或所需的各种手术工具。三个最显著的结果是:(1)非显著的时间延迟显著降低了手术任务的性能;(2)当外科医生操作腹腔镜工具时,异步力反馈导致任务性能明显快于同步性能;(3)当远程外科医生操作腹腔镜并发出命令而本地助手操作手术工具时,同步和异步之间没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Human factors in telesurgery: effects of time delay and asynchrony in video and control feedback with local manipulative assistance.

This paper presents the results of experiments examining the performance of a telesurgeon and an assistant local to the patient performing simulated laparoscopic tasks under a variety of time-delay conditions. Of particular interest is a comparison between the surgeon provided with audio/video and force feedbck synchronously with various time delays, and the surgeon performing asynchronously, where video is delayed relative to force feedback. These conditions are relevant since current telecommunication systems have limited bandwidth, and video signals must be compressed for efficient transmission. This produces a time lag between the video camera and the surgeon's monitor, Force feedback and position commands from a surgical teleoperator require much lower bandwidth, and can be transmitted in near-real time. In the first of two series of experiments, two laparoscopic training tasks were performed under different time-delay conditions, with force and video feedback delayed by equal amounts. In the second series, using the same tasks, the force feedback was more immediate, while the video delay lagged by the time required for compression and decompression. In both experiments, there were various role assignments in terms of whether the telesurgeon or the assistant controlled the laparoscope and/or the various surgical tools required. The three most striking results are that (1) nontrivial time delays significantly degraded the performance of the surgical tasks, (2) asynchronous force feedback resulted in significantly faster task-performance than did synchronous performance when the surgeon operated the laparoscopic tools, and (3) there was no difference between synchrony and asynchrony when the remote surgeon operated the laparoscope and gave commands while the local assistant operated the surgical tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Additional Abstract from the American Telemedicine Association's Fifth Annual Meeting May 21-24, 2000, Phoenix, Arizona. Behavioral Telemedicine: A New Approach to the Continuous Nonintrusive Monitoring of Activities of Daily Living Specialist–Primary Care Provider–Patient Communication in Telemedical Consultations Editorial: Telemedicine Nomenclature: What Does It Mean? Patient Satisfaction with Telemedicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1