人工耳蜗术前成像:磁共振成像足够吗?

The American journal of otology Pub Date : 2000-07-01
S Ellul, C Shelton, H C Davidson, H R Harnsberger
{"title":"人工耳蜗术前成像:磁共振成像足够吗?","authors":"S Ellul,&nbsp;C Shelton,&nbsp;H C Davidson,&nbsp;H R Harnsberger","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a preoperative imaging technique for cochlear implant candidates.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective, blinded.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary medical center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>31 cochlear implant candidates with various causes of hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Cochlear implant patients received preoperative high-resolution temporal bone computed tomography (CT), and high-resolution T2-weighted fast spin echo MRI (FSE-MRI). The images were read independently of each other and in a blinded manner by two neuroradiologists. The imaging results were also correlated with intraoperative findings.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Lack of agreement between the findings for either imaging technique; also, lack of agreement between imaging findings and intraoperative findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FSE-MRI is equal to CT imaging in the detection of abnormalities of cochlear patency. It is better than CT imaging in detecting cochlear dysplasia and large vestibular aqueducts, and in determining the presence of the cochlear nerve.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FSE-MRI is accurate in predicting inner ear anomalies and obstruction of the cochlear lumen. It also adds information not gathered from CT imaging, such as the presence and size of the cochlear nerve.</p>","PeriodicalId":76596,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of otology","volume":"21 4","pages":"528-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative cochlear implant imaging: is magnetic resonance imaging enough?\",\"authors\":\"S Ellul,&nbsp;C Shelton,&nbsp;H C Davidson,&nbsp;H R Harnsberger\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a preoperative imaging technique for cochlear implant candidates.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective, blinded.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary medical center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>31 cochlear implant candidates with various causes of hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Cochlear implant patients received preoperative high-resolution temporal bone computed tomography (CT), and high-resolution T2-weighted fast spin echo MRI (FSE-MRI). The images were read independently of each other and in a blinded manner by two neuroradiologists. The imaging results were also correlated with intraoperative findings.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Lack of agreement between the findings for either imaging technique; also, lack of agreement between imaging findings and intraoperative findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FSE-MRI is equal to CT imaging in the detection of abnormalities of cochlear patency. It is better than CT imaging in detecting cochlear dysplasia and large vestibular aqueducts, and in determining the presence of the cochlear nerve.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FSE-MRI is accurate in predicting inner ear anomalies and obstruction of the cochlear lumen. It also adds information not gathered from CT imaging, such as the presence and size of the cochlear nerve.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of otology\",\"volume\":\"21 4\",\"pages\":\"528-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨磁共振成像(MRI)作为人工耳蜗候选者术前成像技术的准确性。研究设计:回顾性、盲法。环境:三级医疗中心。患者:31例不同原因听力损失的人工耳蜗候选者。干预措施:人工耳蜗患者术前接受高分辨率颞骨计算机断层扫描(CT)和高分辨率t2加权快速自旋回波MRI (FSE-MRI)。这些图像是由两名神经放射学家以盲法独立阅读的。影像学结果也与术中表现相关。主要结局指标:两种影像学检查结果之间缺乏一致性;此外,影像学表现与术中表现之间也缺乏一致性。结果:FSE-MRI对耳蜗通畅异常的诊断效果与CT相当。在检测耳蜗发育不良、大前庭导水管及判断是否存在耳蜗神经方面优于CT。结论:FSE-MRI能准确预测内耳异常和耳蜗腔阻塞。它还增加了CT成像无法获得的信息,如耳蜗神经的存在和大小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preoperative cochlear implant imaging: is magnetic resonance imaging enough?

Objective: To investigate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a preoperative imaging technique for cochlear implant candidates.

Study design: Retrospective, blinded.

Setting: Tertiary medical center.

Patients: 31 cochlear implant candidates with various causes of hearing loss.

Intervention: Cochlear implant patients received preoperative high-resolution temporal bone computed tomography (CT), and high-resolution T2-weighted fast spin echo MRI (FSE-MRI). The images were read independently of each other and in a blinded manner by two neuroradiologists. The imaging results were also correlated with intraoperative findings.

Main outcome measures: Lack of agreement between the findings for either imaging technique; also, lack of agreement between imaging findings and intraoperative findings.

Results: FSE-MRI is equal to CT imaging in the detection of abnormalities of cochlear patency. It is better than CT imaging in detecting cochlear dysplasia and large vestibular aqueducts, and in determining the presence of the cochlear nerve.

Conclusion: FSE-MRI is accurate in predicting inner ear anomalies and obstruction of the cochlear lumen. It also adds information not gathered from CT imaging, such as the presence and size of the cochlear nerve.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Noise-induced hearing loss Petrous Apex Lesions Falls in patients with vestibular deficits. Osteomas of the internal auditory canal: a report of two cases. Effectiveness of conservative management of acoustic neuromas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1