腰椎小关节神经阻滞加或不加辅助剂的诊断有效性及治疗价值。

L Manchikanti, V Pampati, B Fellows, C E Bakhit
{"title":"腰椎小关节神经阻滞加或不加辅助剂的诊断有效性及治疗价值。","authors":"L Manchikanti,&nbsp;V Pampati,&nbsp;B Fellows,&nbsp;C E Bakhit","doi":"10.1007/s11916-000-0016-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Facet joints have been described as an important source of low back pain. The value of medial branch blocks in the diagnosis of facet joint mediated pain is considered important. However, the therapeutic value of medial branch blocks has not been determined. This study was designed to evaluate the duration of relief obtained and therapeutic value following controlled medial branch blocks with or without adjuvant agents Sarapin (High Chemical Company, Levittown, PA) and Depo-medrol (Pharmacia and Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, MI). The study population consisted of 180 consecutive patients seen in a single pain management practice, divided into three groups with 60 patients in each group. Group I was treated with local anesthetic only, Group II with the addition of Sarapin, and Group III with the addition of Depo-medrol along with Sarapin. The prevalence of facet joint pain in chronic low back pain was determined as 36%, with a false-positive rate of 25%. Comparison of duration of relief in days with each block in the three groups showed that the relief was significantly superior in Group III compared with Group I and Group II, whereas Group II was superior to Group I.</p>","PeriodicalId":80271,"journal":{"name":"Current review of pain","volume":"4 5","pages":"337-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11916-000-0016-4","citationCount":"207","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The diagnostic validity and therapeutic value of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks with or without adjuvant agents.\",\"authors\":\"L Manchikanti,&nbsp;V Pampati,&nbsp;B Fellows,&nbsp;C E Bakhit\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11916-000-0016-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Facet joints have been described as an important source of low back pain. The value of medial branch blocks in the diagnosis of facet joint mediated pain is considered important. However, the therapeutic value of medial branch blocks has not been determined. This study was designed to evaluate the duration of relief obtained and therapeutic value following controlled medial branch blocks with or without adjuvant agents Sarapin (High Chemical Company, Levittown, PA) and Depo-medrol (Pharmacia and Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, MI). The study population consisted of 180 consecutive patients seen in a single pain management practice, divided into three groups with 60 patients in each group. Group I was treated with local anesthetic only, Group II with the addition of Sarapin, and Group III with the addition of Depo-medrol along with Sarapin. The prevalence of facet joint pain in chronic low back pain was determined as 36%, with a false-positive rate of 25%. Comparison of duration of relief in days with each block in the three groups showed that the relief was significantly superior in Group III compared with Group I and Group II, whereas Group II was superior to Group I.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current review of pain\",\"volume\":\"4 5\",\"pages\":\"337-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11916-000-0016-4\",\"citationCount\":\"207\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current review of pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-000-0016-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current review of pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-000-0016-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 207

摘要

小关节被认为是腰痛的一个重要原因。内侧支阻滞在小关节介导性疼痛诊断中的价值被认为是重要的。然而,内侧支阻滞的治疗价值尚未确定。本研究旨在评估使用或不使用佐剂Sarapin (High Chemical Company, Levittown, PA)和Depo-medrol (Pharmacia and Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, MI)控制内侧分支阻滞后获得的缓解持续时间和治疗价值。研究人群包括180名连续接受单一疼痛治疗的患者,分为三组,每组60名患者。第一组仅用局麻,第二组加用Sarapin,第三组加用Depo-medrol和Sarapin。慢性腰痛中小关节疼痛的发生率为36%,假阳性率为25%。三组各阻滞的缓解持续时间(d)比较显示,III组的缓解效果明显优于I组和II组,而II组的缓解效果优于I组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The diagnostic validity and therapeutic value of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks with or without adjuvant agents.

Facet joints have been described as an important source of low back pain. The value of medial branch blocks in the diagnosis of facet joint mediated pain is considered important. However, the therapeutic value of medial branch blocks has not been determined. This study was designed to evaluate the duration of relief obtained and therapeutic value following controlled medial branch blocks with or without adjuvant agents Sarapin (High Chemical Company, Levittown, PA) and Depo-medrol (Pharmacia and Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, MI). The study population consisted of 180 consecutive patients seen in a single pain management practice, divided into three groups with 60 patients in each group. Group I was treated with local anesthetic only, Group II with the addition of Sarapin, and Group III with the addition of Depo-medrol along with Sarapin. The prevalence of facet joint pain in chronic low back pain was determined as 36%, with a false-positive rate of 25%. Comparison of duration of relief in days with each block in the three groups showed that the relief was significantly superior in Group III compared with Group I and Group II, whereas Group II was superior to Group I.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is the term "pain disorder" a valid diagnosis? Epidemic occupational pseudo-illness: the plague of acronyms. The debate over chronic pain continues Controversies surrounding reflex sympathetic dystrophy: a review article. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy: a sympathetically mediated pain syndrome or not?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1