{"title":"翌日长者电话跟进:事故及急诊科的需求评估及重大事件监测工具。","authors":"H D Poncia, J Ryan, M Carver","doi":"10.1136/emj.17.5.337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients over the age of 75 years comprise an increasing proportion of accident and emergency (A&E) department attendances. Within this group there is a high incidence of comorbidity, which mandates effective discharge coordination from the A&E department.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aims of this study were to assess the needs of these patients the day after discharge, target patients for appropriate interventions and identify critical incidents.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was undertaken in a district general hospital A&E department that has 62000 new patient attendances per year.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Patients aged 75 years or over who were discharged from the A&E department.</p><p><strong>Exclusion criteria: </strong>Nursing home patients. Patients without a telephone.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Pre-discharge information was collected from the medical notes. A community liaison nurse (CLN) then contacted patients by telephone. A semistructured questionnaire was used to assess patients. Patients were risk stratified and appropriate interventions made. Interventions initiated by the CLN were scored from 1 to 6 based on the level of input required.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>551 patients or their carers were contacted by telephone. Existing home support was felt to be insufficient in 44 (8%) cases and in need of immediate intervention in a further 45 (8%) cases. Sixty five (11%) Category 1 patients required no intervention, 223 (42%) Category 2 patients required advice only, 107 (19%) Category 3 patients were referred to their GP, 127 (23%) Category 4 patients required a domicillary visit by a GP or a nurse, 26 (5%) Category 5 patients were at risk requiring urgent home assessment and three Category 6 patients had to re-attend A&E. Advice was given by the CLN on a broad range of issues and a wide range of health care services was accessed. Five hundred and fifty nine referrals were made by the CLN after telephone assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telephone follow up of patients over 75 attending our A&E department identified a number of areas where care could be improved before and after discharge. This low cost, high quality intervention has the potential for decreasing inappropriate return visits to the department by a vulnerable group of patients as well as improving overall quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73580,"journal":{"name":"Journal of accident & emergency medicine","volume":"17 5","pages":"337-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/emj.17.5.337","citationCount":"50","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Next day telephone follow up of the elderly: a needs assessment and critical incident monitoring tool for the accident and emergency department.\",\"authors\":\"H D Poncia, J Ryan, M Carver\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/emj.17.5.337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients over the age of 75 years comprise an increasing proportion of accident and emergency (A&E) department attendances. Within this group there is a high incidence of comorbidity, which mandates effective discharge coordination from the A&E department.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aims of this study were to assess the needs of these patients the day after discharge, target patients for appropriate interventions and identify critical incidents.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was undertaken in a district general hospital A&E department that has 62000 new patient attendances per year.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Patients aged 75 years or over who were discharged from the A&E department.</p><p><strong>Exclusion criteria: </strong>Nursing home patients. Patients without a telephone.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Pre-discharge information was collected from the medical notes. A community liaison nurse (CLN) then contacted patients by telephone. A semistructured questionnaire was used to assess patients. Patients were risk stratified and appropriate interventions made. Interventions initiated by the CLN were scored from 1 to 6 based on the level of input required.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>551 patients or their carers were contacted by telephone. Existing home support was felt to be insufficient in 44 (8%) cases and in need of immediate intervention in a further 45 (8%) cases. Sixty five (11%) Category 1 patients required no intervention, 223 (42%) Category 2 patients required advice only, 107 (19%) Category 3 patients were referred to their GP, 127 (23%) Category 4 patients required a domicillary visit by a GP or a nurse, 26 (5%) Category 5 patients were at risk requiring urgent home assessment and three Category 6 patients had to re-attend A&E. Advice was given by the CLN on a broad range of issues and a wide range of health care services was accessed. Five hundred and fifty nine referrals were made by the CLN after telephone assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telephone follow up of patients over 75 attending our A&E department identified a number of areas where care could be improved before and after discharge. This low cost, high quality intervention has the potential for decreasing inappropriate return visits to the department by a vulnerable group of patients as well as improving overall quality of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of accident & emergency medicine\",\"volume\":\"17 5\",\"pages\":\"337-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/emj.17.5.337\",\"citationCount\":\"50\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of accident & emergency medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.17.5.337\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of accident & emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.17.5.337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Next day telephone follow up of the elderly: a needs assessment and critical incident monitoring tool for the accident and emergency department.
Background: Patients over the age of 75 years comprise an increasing proportion of accident and emergency (A&E) department attendances. Within this group there is a high incidence of comorbidity, which mandates effective discharge coordination from the A&E department.
Objectives: The aims of this study were to assess the needs of these patients the day after discharge, target patients for appropriate interventions and identify critical incidents.
Setting: The study was undertaken in a district general hospital A&E department that has 62000 new patient attendances per year.
Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 75 years or over who were discharged from the A&E department.
Exclusion criteria: Nursing home patients. Patients without a telephone.
Study design: Pre-discharge information was collected from the medical notes. A community liaison nurse (CLN) then contacted patients by telephone. A semistructured questionnaire was used to assess patients. Patients were risk stratified and appropriate interventions made. Interventions initiated by the CLN were scored from 1 to 6 based on the level of input required.
Results: 551 patients or their carers were contacted by telephone. Existing home support was felt to be insufficient in 44 (8%) cases and in need of immediate intervention in a further 45 (8%) cases. Sixty five (11%) Category 1 patients required no intervention, 223 (42%) Category 2 patients required advice only, 107 (19%) Category 3 patients were referred to their GP, 127 (23%) Category 4 patients required a domicillary visit by a GP or a nurse, 26 (5%) Category 5 patients were at risk requiring urgent home assessment and three Category 6 patients had to re-attend A&E. Advice was given by the CLN on a broad range of issues and a wide range of health care services was accessed. Five hundred and fifty nine referrals were made by the CLN after telephone assessment.
Conclusions: Telephone follow up of patients over 75 attending our A&E department identified a number of areas where care could be improved before and after discharge. This low cost, high quality intervention has the potential for decreasing inappropriate return visits to the department by a vulnerable group of patients as well as improving overall quality of care.