{"title":"提高表达序列标签(EST)数据库的质量:恢复反向、反义cDNA序列。","authors":"E Navarro, L Espinosa","doi":"10.1089/10906590050145230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Expressed sequence tag (EST) databases contain a significant number (5-20%) of reversed, antisense, cDNA sequences that can be recognized by the label \"reversed clone: similarity on wrong strand\" in the annotations to the sequence. Despite this high number of altered sequences, no attempt has been made to explain the alteration in molecular terms, or to evaluate their effect on the quality of the information curated in EST databases. In this paper we try to explain the way these altered sequences are originated, and propose a plausible mechanism: a \"double priming\" of the first strand oligo-dT primer at both ends of nascent cDNAs. In this way, a symmetrical cDNA intermediate is generated, an intermediate that can be cloned after partial digestion with the restriction enzyme used for the directional cloning. Furthermore, when \"secondary\" priming takes place inside the cDNA, the chain synthesized is prone to be truncated prematurely, with the subsequent loss of upstream information. One of the most subtle effects of this cloning alteration is the generation of virtual open reading frames (ORFs) in sequences with no homologues available for comparison. Nevertheless, and according to our model and our data, the \"double priming mechanism\" does not shift the ORF effected, so antisense sequences should be considered as normal ones after a simple transformation in their inverse-complementary forms.</p>","PeriodicalId":79689,"journal":{"name":"Microbial & comparative genomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/10906590050145230","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving quality of expressed sequence tag (EST) databases: recovery of reversed, antisense cDNA sequences.\",\"authors\":\"E Navarro, L Espinosa\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/10906590050145230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Expressed sequence tag (EST) databases contain a significant number (5-20%) of reversed, antisense, cDNA sequences that can be recognized by the label \\\"reversed clone: similarity on wrong strand\\\" in the annotations to the sequence. Despite this high number of altered sequences, no attempt has been made to explain the alteration in molecular terms, or to evaluate their effect on the quality of the information curated in EST databases. In this paper we try to explain the way these altered sequences are originated, and propose a plausible mechanism: a \\\"double priming\\\" of the first strand oligo-dT primer at both ends of nascent cDNAs. In this way, a symmetrical cDNA intermediate is generated, an intermediate that can be cloned after partial digestion with the restriction enzyme used for the directional cloning. Furthermore, when \\\"secondary\\\" priming takes place inside the cDNA, the chain synthesized is prone to be truncated prematurely, with the subsequent loss of upstream information. One of the most subtle effects of this cloning alteration is the generation of virtual open reading frames (ORFs) in sequences with no homologues available for comparison. Nevertheless, and according to our model and our data, the \\\"double priming mechanism\\\" does not shift the ORF effected, so antisense sequences should be considered as normal ones after a simple transformation in their inverse-complementary forms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbial & comparative genomics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/10906590050145230\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbial & comparative genomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/10906590050145230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial & comparative genomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/10906590050145230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving quality of expressed sequence tag (EST) databases: recovery of reversed, antisense cDNA sequences.
Expressed sequence tag (EST) databases contain a significant number (5-20%) of reversed, antisense, cDNA sequences that can be recognized by the label "reversed clone: similarity on wrong strand" in the annotations to the sequence. Despite this high number of altered sequences, no attempt has been made to explain the alteration in molecular terms, or to evaluate their effect on the quality of the information curated in EST databases. In this paper we try to explain the way these altered sequences are originated, and propose a plausible mechanism: a "double priming" of the first strand oligo-dT primer at both ends of nascent cDNAs. In this way, a symmetrical cDNA intermediate is generated, an intermediate that can be cloned after partial digestion with the restriction enzyme used for the directional cloning. Furthermore, when "secondary" priming takes place inside the cDNA, the chain synthesized is prone to be truncated prematurely, with the subsequent loss of upstream information. One of the most subtle effects of this cloning alteration is the generation of virtual open reading frames (ORFs) in sequences with no homologues available for comparison. Nevertheless, and according to our model and our data, the "double priming mechanism" does not shift the ORF effected, so antisense sequences should be considered as normal ones after a simple transformation in their inverse-complementary forms.