一份测量病人对全科医生服务满意度的问卷验证。

S Grogan, M Conner, P Norman, D Willits, I Porter
{"title":"一份测量病人对全科医生服务满意度的问卷验证。","authors":"S Grogan,&nbsp;M Conner,&nbsp;P Norman,&nbsp;D Willits,&nbsp;I Porter","doi":"10.1136/qhc.9.4.210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In order that patient satisfaction may be assessed in a meaningful way, measures that are valid and reliable are required. This study was undertaken to assess the construct validity and internal reliability of the previously developed Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 1390 patients from five practices in the North of England, the Midlands, and Scotland completed the questionnaire. Responses were checked for construct validity (including confirmatory factor analysis to check the factor structure of the scale) and internal reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Confirmatory factor analysis showed that items loaded on the appropriate factors in a five factor model (doctors, nurses, access, appointments, and facilities). Scores on the specific subscales showed highly significant positive correlations with general satisfaction subscale scores suggesting construct validity. Also, the prediction (derived from past research) that older people would be more satisfied with the service was borne out by the results (F (4, 1312) = 57.10; p < 0.0001), providing further construct validation. The five specific subscales (doctors, nurses, access, appointments, and facilities), the general satisfaction subscale, and the questionnaire as a whole were found to have high internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.74-0.95).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that the PSQ is a valid and internally reliable tool for assessing patient satisfaction with general practitioner services.</p>","PeriodicalId":20773,"journal":{"name":"Quality in health care : QHC","volume":"9 4","pages":"210-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/qhc.9.4.210","citationCount":"210","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with general practitioner services.\",\"authors\":\"S Grogan,&nbsp;M Conner,&nbsp;P Norman,&nbsp;D Willits,&nbsp;I Porter\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/qhc.9.4.210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In order that patient satisfaction may be assessed in a meaningful way, measures that are valid and reliable are required. This study was undertaken to assess the construct validity and internal reliability of the previously developed Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 1390 patients from five practices in the North of England, the Midlands, and Scotland completed the questionnaire. Responses were checked for construct validity (including confirmatory factor analysis to check the factor structure of the scale) and internal reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Confirmatory factor analysis showed that items loaded on the appropriate factors in a five factor model (doctors, nurses, access, appointments, and facilities). Scores on the specific subscales showed highly significant positive correlations with general satisfaction subscale scores suggesting construct validity. Also, the prediction (derived from past research) that older people would be more satisfied with the service was borne out by the results (F (4, 1312) = 57.10; p < 0.0001), providing further construct validation. The five specific subscales (doctors, nurses, access, appointments, and facilities), the general satisfaction subscale, and the questionnaire as a whole were found to have high internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.74-0.95).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that the PSQ is a valid and internally reliable tool for assessing patient satisfaction with general practitioner services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality in health care : QHC\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"210-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/qhc.9.4.210\",\"citationCount\":\"210\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality in health care : QHC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.9.4.210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in health care : QHC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.9.4.210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 210

摘要

背景:为了以有意义的方式评估患者满意度,需要有效可靠的测量方法。本研究旨在评估先前开发的患者满意度问卷(PSQ)的结构效度和内部信度。方法:来自英格兰北部、中部和苏格兰5个诊所共1390名患者完成问卷调查。对问卷的构念效度(包括验证性因子分析以检验量表的因子结构)和内部信度进行检验。结果:验证性因子分析显示,在五因素模型(医生、护士、准入、预约和设施)中,项目加载在适当的因素上。特定子量表的得分与总体满意度子量表得分呈高度显著的正相关,表明结构效度。此外,预测(来自过去的研究),老年人会更满意的服务是由结果证实(F (4,1312) = 57.10;P < 0.0001),进一步验证了结构。五个特定的子量表(医生、护士、访问、预约和设施)、一般满意度子量表和问卷整体具有较高的内部信度(Cronbach's alpha = 0.74-0.95)。结论:结果表明PSQ是一种有效且内部可靠的评估全科医生服务满意度的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of a questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with general practitioner services.

Background: In order that patient satisfaction may be assessed in a meaningful way, measures that are valid and reliable are required. This study was undertaken to assess the construct validity and internal reliability of the previously developed Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ).

Method: A total of 1390 patients from five practices in the North of England, the Midlands, and Scotland completed the questionnaire. Responses were checked for construct validity (including confirmatory factor analysis to check the factor structure of the scale) and internal reliability.

Results: Confirmatory factor analysis showed that items loaded on the appropriate factors in a five factor model (doctors, nurses, access, appointments, and facilities). Scores on the specific subscales showed highly significant positive correlations with general satisfaction subscale scores suggesting construct validity. Also, the prediction (derived from past research) that older people would be more satisfied with the service was borne out by the results (F (4, 1312) = 57.10; p < 0.0001), providing further construct validation. The five specific subscales (doctors, nurses, access, appointments, and facilities), the general satisfaction subscale, and the questionnaire as a whole were found to have high internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.74-0.95).

Conclusion: The results suggest that the PSQ is a valid and internally reliable tool for assessing patient satisfaction with general practitioner services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Engaging patients in decisions: a challenge to health care delivery and public health. The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments. Preferences and understanding their effects on health. Evidence-based patient empowerment. Performance management at the crossroads in the NHS: don't go into the red.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1