谁会在怀孕期间接受伴侣暴力筛查?

K A Clark, S L Martin, R Petersen, S Cloutier, D Covington, P Buescher, M Beck-Warden
{"title":"谁会在怀孕期间接受伴侣暴力筛查?","authors":"K A Clark,&nbsp;S L Martin,&nbsp;R Petersen,&nbsp;S Cloutier,&nbsp;D Covington,&nbsp;P Buescher,&nbsp;M Beck-Warden","doi":"10.1001/archfami.9.10.1093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Despite recommendations to screen prenatal care patients for partner violence, the prevalence of such screening is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To estimate the statewide prevalence of partner violence screening during prenatal care among a representative sample of North Carolina women with newborns and to compare women screened for partner violence with women not screened.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This investigation examines data gathered through the North Carolina Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, a random sample of more than 2600 recently postpartum women who were delivered of newborns between July 1997 and December 1998.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Self-reports of violence, health service factors, and sociodemographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>The prevalence of screening was computed, and odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used to examine bivariate and multivariable associations between being screened for partner violence and other factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven percent of women reported being screened for partner violence during prenatal care. Logistic regression analysis found that women were more likely to be screened if they received prenatal care from (1) a public provider paid by a public source; (2) a private provider paid by a public source; or (3) a public provider paid by a private source.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that the majority of prenatal care patients in North Carolina are not screened for partner violence. Screening appears to be most highly associated with whether a woman is a patient in the public sector or the private sector, and with the source of payment for prenatal care. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1093-1099</p>","PeriodicalId":8295,"journal":{"name":"Archives of family medicine","volume":"9 10","pages":"1093-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who gets screened during pregnancy for partner violence?\",\"authors\":\"K A Clark,&nbsp;S L Martin,&nbsp;R Petersen,&nbsp;S Cloutier,&nbsp;D Covington,&nbsp;P Buescher,&nbsp;M Beck-Warden\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/archfami.9.10.1093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Despite recommendations to screen prenatal care patients for partner violence, the prevalence of such screening is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To estimate the statewide prevalence of partner violence screening during prenatal care among a representative sample of North Carolina women with newborns and to compare women screened for partner violence with women not screened.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This investigation examines data gathered through the North Carolina Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, a random sample of more than 2600 recently postpartum women who were delivered of newborns between July 1997 and December 1998.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Self-reports of violence, health service factors, and sociodemographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>The prevalence of screening was computed, and odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used to examine bivariate and multivariable associations between being screened for partner violence and other factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven percent of women reported being screened for partner violence during prenatal care. Logistic regression analysis found that women were more likely to be screened if they received prenatal care from (1) a public provider paid by a public source; (2) a private provider paid by a public source; or (3) a public provider paid by a private source.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that the majority of prenatal care patients in North Carolina are not screened for partner violence. Screening appears to be most highly associated with whether a woman is a patient in the public sector or the private sector, and with the source of payment for prenatal care. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1093-1099</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of family medicine\",\"volume\":\"9 10\",\"pages\":\"1093-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of family medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of family medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

摘要

背景:尽管建议对产前护理患者进行伴侣暴力筛查,但这种筛查的流行程度尚不清楚。目的:估计北卡罗来纳州新生儿妇女产前护理期间伴侣暴力筛查在全州范围内的流行程度,并比较接受伴侣暴力筛查的妇女与未接受筛查的妇女。设计、设置和参与者:本调查检查了通过北卡罗莱纳州妊娠风险评估监测系统收集的数据,该系统随机抽样了1997年7月至1998年12月期间分娩新生儿的2600多名产后妇女。主要结果测量:暴力、卫生服务因素和社会人口特征的自我报告。分析:计算筛查的流行率,并使用比值比和95%置信区间来检查筛查伴侣暴力与其他因素之间的双变量和多变量关联。结果:37%的妇女报告在产前护理期间接受了伴侣暴力筛查。Logistic回归分析发现,如果妇女接受产前护理,她们更有可能接受筛查(1)由公共来源支付的公共提供者;(2)由公共来源支付的私人提供者;或(3)由私人来源支付的公共提供者。结论:这些发现表明,大多数产前护理患者在北卡罗莱纳没有筛选伴侣暴力。筛查似乎与一名妇女是在公共部门还是私营部门就诊密切相关,并与产前护理的支付来源密切相关。中华医学杂志。2000;9:1093-1099
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Who gets screened during pregnancy for partner violence?

Context: Despite recommendations to screen prenatal care patients for partner violence, the prevalence of such screening is unknown.

Objectives: To estimate the statewide prevalence of partner violence screening during prenatal care among a representative sample of North Carolina women with newborns and to compare women screened for partner violence with women not screened.

Design, setting, and participants: This investigation examines data gathered through the North Carolina Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, a random sample of more than 2600 recently postpartum women who were delivered of newborns between July 1997 and December 1998.

Main outcome measures: Self-reports of violence, health service factors, and sociodemographic characteristics.

Analysis: The prevalence of screening was computed, and odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used to examine bivariate and multivariable associations between being screened for partner violence and other factors.

Results: Thirty-seven percent of women reported being screened for partner violence during prenatal care. Logistic regression analysis found that women were more likely to be screened if they received prenatal care from (1) a public provider paid by a public source; (2) a private provider paid by a public source; or (3) a public provider paid by a private source.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that the majority of prenatal care patients in North Carolina are not screened for partner violence. Screening appears to be most highly associated with whether a woman is a patient in the public sector or the private sector, and with the source of payment for prenatal care. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1093-1099

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Human papillomavirus infection. Walking the line. A Short Collection of Fables for Learning the Fundamental Principles of Family Medicine: Chapter 1. Comprehensiveness, Continuity, Contextualization and Family Clues to early Alzheimer dementia in the outpatient setting. Competing demands from physical problems: effect on initiating and completing depression care over 6 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1