E H Lin, M VonKorff, J Russo, W Katon, G E Simon, J Unützer, T Bush, E Walker, E Ludman
{"title":"初级保健中的抑郁症治疗能减少残疾吗?阶梯式护理方法。","authors":"E H Lin, M VonKorff, J Russo, W Katon, G E Simon, J Unützer, T Bush, E Walker, E Ludman","doi":"10.1001/archfami.9.10.1052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess effects of stepped collaborative care depression intervention on disability.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four primary care clinics of a large health maintenance organization.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Two hundred twenty-eight patients with either 4 or more persistent major depressive symptoms or a score of 1.5 or greater on the Hopkins Symptom Checklist. Depression items were randomized to stepped care intervention or usual care 6 to 8 weeks after initiating antidepressant medication.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Augmented treatment of persistently depressed patients by an on-site psychiatrist collaborating with primary care physicians. Treatment included patient education, adjustment of pharmacotherapy, and proactive monitoring of outcomes.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-month assessments of the Sheehan Disability Scale and the social function and role limitation subscales of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who received the depression intervention experienced less interference in their family, work, and social activities than patients receiving usual primary care (Sheehan Disability Scale, z = 2.23; P =.025). Patients receiving intervention also reported a trend toward more improvement in SF-36-defined social functioning than patients receiving usual care (z = 1.63, P =.10), but there was no significant difference in role performance (z = 0.07, P =.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant disability accompanied depression in this persistently depressed group. The stepped care intervention resulted in small to moderate functional improvements for these primary care patients. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1052-1058</p>","PeriodicalId":8295,"journal":{"name":"Archives of family medicine","volume":"9 10","pages":"1052-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"120","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can depression treatment in primary care reduce disability? A stepped care approach.\",\"authors\":\"E H Lin, M VonKorff, J Russo, W Katon, G E Simon, J Unützer, T Bush, E Walker, E Ludman\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/archfami.9.10.1052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess effects of stepped collaborative care depression intervention on disability.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four primary care clinics of a large health maintenance organization.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Two hundred twenty-eight patients with either 4 or more persistent major depressive symptoms or a score of 1.5 or greater on the Hopkins Symptom Checklist. Depression items were randomized to stepped care intervention or usual care 6 to 8 weeks after initiating antidepressant medication.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Augmented treatment of persistently depressed patients by an on-site psychiatrist collaborating with primary care physicians. Treatment included patient education, adjustment of pharmacotherapy, and proactive monitoring of outcomes.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-month assessments of the Sheehan Disability Scale and the social function and role limitation subscales of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who received the depression intervention experienced less interference in their family, work, and social activities than patients receiving usual primary care (Sheehan Disability Scale, z = 2.23; P =.025). Patients receiving intervention also reported a trend toward more improvement in SF-36-defined social functioning than patients receiving usual care (z = 1.63, P =.10), but there was no significant difference in role performance (z = 0.07, P =.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant disability accompanied depression in this persistently depressed group. The stepped care intervention resulted in small to moderate functional improvements for these primary care patients. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1052-1058</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of family medicine\",\"volume\":\"9 10\",\"pages\":\"1052-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"120\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of family medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of family medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 120
摘要
目的:评价阶梯式协同护理对残疾抑郁症的干预效果。设计:随机对照试验。环境:一家大型保健机构的四个初级保健诊所。患者:228例患者有4个或以上持续性重度抑郁症状,或在霍普金斯症状检查表中得分为1.5或更高。抑郁症患者在开始抗抑郁药物治疗后6至8周随机分为阶梯护理干预组或常规护理组。干预:由现场精神科医生与初级保健医生合作,加强对持续抑郁症患者的治疗。治疗包括患者教育、调整药物治疗和积极监测结果。主要结果测量:基线、1个月、3个月和6个月的Sheehan残疾量表评估,以及医学结果研究36项简短健康调查(SF-36)的社会功能和角色限制子量表评估。结果:接受抑郁症干预的患者在家庭、工作和社会活动中受到的干扰比接受常规初级保健的患者少(Sheehan残疾量表,z = 2.23;P = .025)。与接受常规护理的患者相比,接受干预的患者在sf -36定义的社会功能方面也有更多改善的趋势(z = 1.63, P = 0.10),但在角色表现方面没有显著差异(z = 0.07, P = 0.94)。结论:在这个持续抑郁的组中有显著的残疾伴抑郁。阶梯式护理干预对这些初级保健患者的功能有小到中度的改善。中华医学杂志。2000;9:1052-1058
Can depression treatment in primary care reduce disability? A stepped care approach.
Objective: To assess effects of stepped collaborative care depression intervention on disability.
Design: Randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Four primary care clinics of a large health maintenance organization.
Patients: Two hundred twenty-eight patients with either 4 or more persistent major depressive symptoms or a score of 1.5 or greater on the Hopkins Symptom Checklist. Depression items were randomized to stepped care intervention or usual care 6 to 8 weeks after initiating antidepressant medication.
Intervention: Augmented treatment of persistently depressed patients by an on-site psychiatrist collaborating with primary care physicians. Treatment included patient education, adjustment of pharmacotherapy, and proactive monitoring of outcomes.
Main outcome measures: Baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-month assessments of the Sheehan Disability Scale and the social function and role limitation subscales of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36).
Results: Patients who received the depression intervention experienced less interference in their family, work, and social activities than patients receiving usual primary care (Sheehan Disability Scale, z = 2.23; P =.025). Patients receiving intervention also reported a trend toward more improvement in SF-36-defined social functioning than patients receiving usual care (z = 1.63, P =.10), but there was no significant difference in role performance (z = 0.07, P =.94).
Conclusions: Significant disability accompanied depression in this persistently depressed group. The stepped care intervention resulted in small to moderate functional improvements for these primary care patients. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1052-1058