母体生活史-相对于以妊娠为中心的产前滥用物质暴露评估

Risë B Goldstein , Gail J McAvay , Edward V Nunes , Myrna M Weissman
{"title":"母体生活史-相对于以妊娠为中心的产前滥用物质暴露评估","authors":"Risë B Goldstein ,&nbsp;Gail J McAvay ,&nbsp;Edward V Nunes ,&nbsp;Myrna M Weissman","doi":"10.1016/S0899-3289(00)00032-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Purpose</em><span>: Substance use by pregnant women is socially stigmatized and may be legally punishable. This societal condemnation raises concerns about underascertainment of prenatal substance exposure of offspring if mothers are asked specifically about their behavior during gestation, versus their life histories without reference to gestational dates. This study assessed agreement between life history-focused and pregnancy-focused assessments of prenatal exposure, and percentages of offspring classified as exposed to a range of substances by each measure, in a sample of school-aged children of methadone-maintained, opioid-dependent parents.</span></p><p><em>Methods</em><span>: Prenatal exposure was assessed in 172 offspring of 109 mothers by: (a) questionnaires administered to mothers about substance use during pregnancy; and (b) best-estimate (BE) diagnoses of substance use disorders in mothers overlapping with pregnancy dates. BE diagnoses were based on interviews with the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime Version, conducted by trained mental health professionals with mothers about their life histories of psychiatric and substance use disorders, as well as mothers' medical records. Chance-corrected agreement between the measures was examined using κ statistics. Percentages of offspring classified as exposed by each method were compared using McNemar χ</span><sup>2</sup> tests.</p><p><em>Results</em>: Except for cigarettes, agreement between the measures was poor. Except for alcohol, diagnosed episodes of substance use disorders in mothers with dates overlapping pregnancy classified more offspring as exposed than mothers' responses to the questionnaire focusing on behavior while pregnant, though the differences in proportions identified as exposed were not always large or statistically significant.</p><p><em>Implications</em>: When retrospective ascertainment of prenatal exposure is necessary, asking mothers for their own life histories, without reference to pregnancy dates, may be the preferred approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73959,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance abuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0899-3289(00)00032-8","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternal Life History- Versus Gestation-Focused Assessment of Prenatal Exposure to Substances of Abuse\",\"authors\":\"Risë B Goldstein ,&nbsp;Gail J McAvay ,&nbsp;Edward V Nunes ,&nbsp;Myrna M Weissman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0899-3289(00)00032-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><em>Purpose</em><span>: Substance use by pregnant women is socially stigmatized and may be legally punishable. This societal condemnation raises concerns about underascertainment of prenatal substance exposure of offspring if mothers are asked specifically about their behavior during gestation, versus their life histories without reference to gestational dates. This study assessed agreement between life history-focused and pregnancy-focused assessments of prenatal exposure, and percentages of offspring classified as exposed to a range of substances by each measure, in a sample of school-aged children of methadone-maintained, opioid-dependent parents.</span></p><p><em>Methods</em><span>: Prenatal exposure was assessed in 172 offspring of 109 mothers by: (a) questionnaires administered to mothers about substance use during pregnancy; and (b) best-estimate (BE) diagnoses of substance use disorders in mothers overlapping with pregnancy dates. BE diagnoses were based on interviews with the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime Version, conducted by trained mental health professionals with mothers about their life histories of psychiatric and substance use disorders, as well as mothers' medical records. Chance-corrected agreement between the measures was examined using κ statistics. Percentages of offspring classified as exposed by each method were compared using McNemar χ</span><sup>2</sup> tests.</p><p><em>Results</em>: Except for cigarettes, agreement between the measures was poor. Except for alcohol, diagnosed episodes of substance use disorders in mothers with dates overlapping pregnancy classified more offspring as exposed than mothers' responses to the questionnaire focusing on behavior while pregnant, though the differences in proportions identified as exposed were not always large or statistically significant.</p><p><em>Implications</em>: When retrospective ascertainment of prenatal exposure is necessary, asking mothers for their own life histories, without reference to pregnancy dates, may be the preferred approach.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of substance abuse\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0899-3289(00)00032-8\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of substance abuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899328900000328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance abuse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899328900000328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:孕妇使用药物受到社会歧视,可能受到法律惩罚。这种社会谴责引起了人们的担忧,即如果母亲在怀孕期间被具体询问她们的行为,而不是在没有提及怀孕日期的情况下询问她们的生活史,那么对后代产前物质暴露的了解就会不足。本研究评估了以生活史为重点和以妊娠为重点的产前暴露评估之间的一致性,以及在美沙酮维持、阿片类药物依赖的父母的学龄儿童样本中,通过每种测量将后代分类为暴露于一系列物质的百分比。方法:对109名母亲的172名子女进行产前暴露评估:(a)向母亲发放有关怀孕期间药物使用的问卷;(b)与怀孕日期重叠的母亲的物质使用障碍的最佳估计(BE)诊断。BE的诊断是基于对情感性障碍和精神分裂症终生版时间表的访谈,由训练有素的精神卫生专业人员对母亲的精神和物质使用障碍的生活史以及母亲的医疗记录进行访谈。使用κ统计量检查测量之间的机会校正一致性。采用McNemar χ2检验比较每种方法的暴露子代百分比。结果:除卷烟外,各措施之间的一致性较差。除了酒精之外,怀孕日期重叠的母亲诊断出的物质使用障碍发作将更多的后代归类为暴露,而不是母亲对怀孕期间行为的调查问卷的回答,尽管被确定为暴露的比例差异并不总是很大或统计上显着。意义:当回顾性确定产前暴露是必要的,询问母亲自己的生活史,不参考怀孕日期,可能是首选的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Maternal Life History- Versus Gestation-Focused Assessment of Prenatal Exposure to Substances of Abuse

Purpose: Substance use by pregnant women is socially stigmatized and may be legally punishable. This societal condemnation raises concerns about underascertainment of prenatal substance exposure of offspring if mothers are asked specifically about their behavior during gestation, versus their life histories without reference to gestational dates. This study assessed agreement between life history-focused and pregnancy-focused assessments of prenatal exposure, and percentages of offspring classified as exposed to a range of substances by each measure, in a sample of school-aged children of methadone-maintained, opioid-dependent parents.

Methods: Prenatal exposure was assessed in 172 offspring of 109 mothers by: (a) questionnaires administered to mothers about substance use during pregnancy; and (b) best-estimate (BE) diagnoses of substance use disorders in mothers overlapping with pregnancy dates. BE diagnoses were based on interviews with the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime Version, conducted by trained mental health professionals with mothers about their life histories of psychiatric and substance use disorders, as well as mothers' medical records. Chance-corrected agreement between the measures was examined using κ statistics. Percentages of offspring classified as exposed by each method were compared using McNemar χ2 tests.

Results: Except for cigarettes, agreement between the measures was poor. Except for alcohol, diagnosed episodes of substance use disorders in mothers with dates overlapping pregnancy classified more offspring as exposed than mothers' responses to the questionnaire focusing on behavior while pregnant, though the differences in proportions identified as exposed were not always large or statistically significant.

Implications: When retrospective ascertainment of prenatal exposure is necessary, asking mothers for their own life histories, without reference to pregnancy dates, may be the preferred approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Childhood emotional abuse and depression: The mediating roles of emotion regulation and resilience From night owl to angry bird: Investigating the association between chronotype and aggression ‘You never cared about me’: An analysis of ethnic minority men’s coping mechanisms and risk factors after a relationship breakdown Change in psychosocial functioning and social relations among women in residential substance abuse treatment Prediction of DISC substance abuse and dependency for ethnically diverse adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1