Garrote Adrados J, Arranz Sanz E, Blanco Quirós A, Oyaguez Ugidos P, Calvo Romero C, Blanco Del Val A, Alonso Franch M
{"title":"血清学指标在乳糜泻诊断中的价值。提议的协议]。","authors":"Garrote Adrados J, Arranz Sanz E, Blanco Quirós A, Oyaguez Ugidos P, Calvo Romero C, Blanco Del Val A, Alonso Franch M","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>In recent years, the high frequency of atypical cases of celiac disease (CD) and of forms of this disease with minor symptoms has prompted the search for analytical markers that may support indications for intestinal biopsy. The commonest tests are those for serum class IgG and IgA antigliadin antibodies (IgG-AGA, IgA-AGA) and IgA antiendomysial antibodies (IgA-EmA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We report our 10 year experience of studying AGA in 1,075 serum samples from patients with CD and IgA-EmA in 534 samples. The serological markers were compared with 152 intestinal biopsies performed simultaneously with the other tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In patients with severe intestinal atrophy the sensitivity of IgA-AGA (91%) and IgA-EmA (94%) was high. IgA-EmA and the latter showed the highest positive (88%) and negative (97%) predictive values. In all patients, IgA-EmA positivity coincided with alterations in the biopsy. Determination of IgA-EmA was also the most efficient marker for monitoring the gluten free diet phase. However, in patients in whom minimal histological changes were found in the intestinal mucosa, none of the markers was sufficiently accurate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IgA- EmA antibodies are the most accurate serological marker of CD. In view of these results and the estimated prevalence of the disease, protocols for the use of serological markers are proposed for the differential diagnosis of malabsorption symptoms, for use in patients at low and high risk of CD and for the followup of those with a diagnosis of CD.</p>","PeriodicalId":7778,"journal":{"name":"Anales Espanoles De Pediatria","volume":"53 6","pages":"533-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Value of serological markers in the diagnosis of celiac disease. A proposed protocol].\",\"authors\":\"Garrote Adrados J, Arranz Sanz E, Blanco Quirós A, Oyaguez Ugidos P, Calvo Romero C, Blanco Del Val A, Alonso Franch M\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>In recent years, the high frequency of atypical cases of celiac disease (CD) and of forms of this disease with minor symptoms has prompted the search for analytical markers that may support indications for intestinal biopsy. The commonest tests are those for serum class IgG and IgA antigliadin antibodies (IgG-AGA, IgA-AGA) and IgA antiendomysial antibodies (IgA-EmA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We report our 10 year experience of studying AGA in 1,075 serum samples from patients with CD and IgA-EmA in 534 samples. The serological markers were compared with 152 intestinal biopsies performed simultaneously with the other tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In patients with severe intestinal atrophy the sensitivity of IgA-AGA (91%) and IgA-EmA (94%) was high. IgA-EmA and the latter showed the highest positive (88%) and negative (97%) predictive values. In all patients, IgA-EmA positivity coincided with alterations in the biopsy. Determination of IgA-EmA was also the most efficient marker for monitoring the gluten free diet phase. However, in patients in whom minimal histological changes were found in the intestinal mucosa, none of the markers was sufficiently accurate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IgA- EmA antibodies are the most accurate serological marker of CD. In view of these results and the estimated prevalence of the disease, protocols for the use of serological markers are proposed for the differential diagnosis of malabsorption symptoms, for use in patients at low and high risk of CD and for the followup of those with a diagnosis of CD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anales Espanoles De Pediatria\",\"volume\":\"53 6\",\"pages\":\"533-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anales Espanoles De Pediatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales Espanoles De Pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:近年来,乳糜泻(CD)的非典型病例的高频率和这种疾病形式的轻微症状,促使人们寻找可能支持肠道活检指征的分析标记物。最常见的测试是血清IgG和IgA抗麦胶蛋白抗体(IgG- aga, IgA- aga)和IgA抗肌内膜抗体(IgA- ema)。方法:我们报告了我们在1075份CD患者血清样本中研究AGA的10年经验,在534份样本中研究IgA-EmA。将血清学标志物与152例与其他检查同时进行的肠道活组织检查进行比较。结果:在严重肠萎缩患者中IgA-AGA(91%)和IgA-EmA(94%)的敏感性较高。IgA-EmA和后者的阳性预测值最高(88%),阴性预测值最高(97%)。在所有患者中,IgA-EmA阳性与活检改变一致。IgA-EmA的测定也是监测无麸质饮食阶段最有效的标志物。然而,在肠黏膜组织学变化最小的患者中,没有一种标志物足够准确。结果:IgA- EmA抗体是乳糜泻最准确的血清学标志物。鉴于这些结果和估计的疾病患病率,提出了使用血清学标志物鉴别诊断吸收不良症状的方案,用于乳糜泻低风险和高风险患者以及诊断为乳糜泻的患者的随访。
[Value of serological markers in the diagnosis of celiac disease. A proposed protocol].
Aim: In recent years, the high frequency of atypical cases of celiac disease (CD) and of forms of this disease with minor symptoms has prompted the search for analytical markers that may support indications for intestinal biopsy. The commonest tests are those for serum class IgG and IgA antigliadin antibodies (IgG-AGA, IgA-AGA) and IgA antiendomysial antibodies (IgA-EmA).
Methods: We report our 10 year experience of studying AGA in 1,075 serum samples from patients with CD and IgA-EmA in 534 samples. The serological markers were compared with 152 intestinal biopsies performed simultaneously with the other tests.
Results: In patients with severe intestinal atrophy the sensitivity of IgA-AGA (91%) and IgA-EmA (94%) was high. IgA-EmA and the latter showed the highest positive (88%) and negative (97%) predictive values. In all patients, IgA-EmA positivity coincided with alterations in the biopsy. Determination of IgA-EmA was also the most efficient marker for monitoring the gluten free diet phase. However, in patients in whom minimal histological changes were found in the intestinal mucosa, none of the markers was sufficiently accurate.
Results: IgA- EmA antibodies are the most accurate serological marker of CD. In view of these results and the estimated prevalence of the disease, protocols for the use of serological markers are proposed for the differential diagnosis of malabsorption symptoms, for use in patients at low and high risk of CD and for the followup of those with a diagnosis of CD.