开放的腹腔镜检查。评论。

Biomedical bulletin Pub Date : 1984-08-01
D H Huber
{"title":"开放的腹腔镜检查。评论。","authors":"D H Huber","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Open laparoscopy has been receiving increased attention in the US and internationally. However, opinions differ on its appropriate role in laparoscopy services. In the US some surgeons remain comfortable using closed laparoscopy for all patients, including some who have had previous abdominal surgery. Some centers are using more open procedures, especially for training programs and for cases where open laparoscopy may be indicated, as described by Dr. Hasson in this \"Bulletin.\" Others have converted to performing all laparoscopy by the open technique. The Planned Parenthood Federation of America encourages minilaparotomy and open laparoscopy for tubal occlusion n its facilities because of the greater inherent potential for patient safety with these approaches. AVS has not provided open laparoscopy equipment to international programs, although some projects have used an open technique. Neither the World Federation of Health Agencies for the Advancement of Voluntary Surgical Contraception nor the AVS Science Committee has addressed the role of open laparoscopy in international programs. This is due in part to insufficient worldwide experience in open laparoscopy. However, this does not preclude AVS from providing such equipment for open laparoscopy in the future. In the US approximately 300-500 Hasson cannulas have been commercially distributed annually for the past 4-5 years. About 2000 may be currently in use in the US. Therefore, among the 6915 hospitals registered with the American Hospital Association in 1982, a substantial proportion may now provide access to open laparoscopy equipment. Studies in the US are not yet available to fully assess the safety of open laparoscopy. However, general comparisons of complication rates for open and closed laparoscopy may not be appropriate since many surgeons reserve the more complicated cases for open laparoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":84276,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical bulletin","volume":"5 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open laparoscopy. Commentary.\",\"authors\":\"D H Huber\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Open laparoscopy has been receiving increased attention in the US and internationally. However, opinions differ on its appropriate role in laparoscopy services. In the US some surgeons remain comfortable using closed laparoscopy for all patients, including some who have had previous abdominal surgery. Some centers are using more open procedures, especially for training programs and for cases where open laparoscopy may be indicated, as described by Dr. Hasson in this \\\"Bulletin.\\\" Others have converted to performing all laparoscopy by the open technique. The Planned Parenthood Federation of America encourages minilaparotomy and open laparoscopy for tubal occlusion n its facilities because of the greater inherent potential for patient safety with these approaches. AVS has not provided open laparoscopy equipment to international programs, although some projects have used an open technique. Neither the World Federation of Health Agencies for the Advancement of Voluntary Surgical Contraception nor the AVS Science Committee has addressed the role of open laparoscopy in international programs. This is due in part to insufficient worldwide experience in open laparoscopy. However, this does not preclude AVS from providing such equipment for open laparoscopy in the future. In the US approximately 300-500 Hasson cannulas have been commercially distributed annually for the past 4-5 years. About 2000 may be currently in use in the US. Therefore, among the 6915 hospitals registered with the American Hospital Association in 1982, a substantial proportion may now provide access to open laparoscopy equipment. Studies in the US are not yet available to fully assess the safety of open laparoscopy. However, general comparisons of complication rates for open and closed laparoscopy may not be appropriate since many surgeons reserve the more complicated cases for open laparoscopy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":84276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical bulletin\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腹腔镜手术在美国和国际上受到越来越多的关注。然而,关于其在腹腔镜服务中的适当作用,意见不一。在美国,一些外科医生仍然对所有患者使用闭式腹腔镜手术感到舒适,包括一些以前做过腹部手术的患者。正如Hasson博士在这篇“公报”中所描述的那样,一些中心正在使用更开放的程序,特别是在培训项目和可能需要开放腹腔镜检查的病例中。另一些人则改用开放式技术进行所有腹腔镜检查。美国计划生育联合会(Planned Parenthood Federation of America)鼓励在其机构内进行小切口和开放式腹腔镜手术治疗输卵管阻塞,因为这些方法具有更大的患者安全潜力。AVS还没有向国际项目提供开放式腹腔镜设备,尽管一些项目已经使用了开放式技术。无论是促进自愿手术避孕的世界卫生机构联合会还是AVS科学委员会都没有在国际项目中讨论开放式腹腔镜手术的作用。部分原因是由于世界范围内开放腹腔镜手术经验不足。然而,这并不妨碍AVS在未来为开放式腹腔镜提供此类设备。在美国,在过去的4-5年里,每年大约有300-500个哈森套管被商业分销。目前在美国使用的大约有2000台。因此,在1982年在美国医院协会注册的6915家医院中,很大一部分现在可以提供开放式腹腔镜设备。美国的研究尚未充分评估开腹腹腔镜手术的安全性。然而,由于许多外科医生将更复杂的病例保留为开腹腹腔镜,因此对开腹腹腔镜和闭腹腹腔镜的并发症发生率进行一般性比较可能并不合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Open laparoscopy. Commentary.

Open laparoscopy has been receiving increased attention in the US and internationally. However, opinions differ on its appropriate role in laparoscopy services. In the US some surgeons remain comfortable using closed laparoscopy for all patients, including some who have had previous abdominal surgery. Some centers are using more open procedures, especially for training programs and for cases where open laparoscopy may be indicated, as described by Dr. Hasson in this "Bulletin." Others have converted to performing all laparoscopy by the open technique. The Planned Parenthood Federation of America encourages minilaparotomy and open laparoscopy for tubal occlusion n its facilities because of the greater inherent potential for patient safety with these approaches. AVS has not provided open laparoscopy equipment to international programs, although some projects have used an open technique. Neither the World Federation of Health Agencies for the Advancement of Voluntary Surgical Contraception nor the AVS Science Committee has addressed the role of open laparoscopy in international programs. This is due in part to insufficient worldwide experience in open laparoscopy. However, this does not preclude AVS from providing such equipment for open laparoscopy in the future. In the US approximately 300-500 Hasson cannulas have been commercially distributed annually for the past 4-5 years. About 2000 may be currently in use in the US. Therefore, among the 6915 hospitals registered with the American Hospital Association in 1982, a substantial proportion may now provide access to open laparoscopy equipment. Studies in the US are not yet available to fully assess the safety of open laparoscopy. However, general comparisons of complication rates for open and closed laparoscopy may not be appropriate since many surgeons reserve the more complicated cases for open laparoscopy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevention of infection in voluntary surgical contraception. A review of epidemiologic studies of vasectomy. Open laparoscopy. Open laparoscopy. Commentary. Open laparoscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1