人口流动与土著人民:来自澳大利亚的观点。

J Taylor, M Bell
{"title":"人口流动与土著人民:来自澳大利亚的观点。","authors":"J Taylor,&nbsp;M Bell","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1099-1220(199606)2:2<153::AID-IJPG19>3.0.CO;2-U","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>\"This paper describes an emerging field of demographic enquiry focused on the population mobility of indigenous minorities in Australasia and North America. Political, scientific and policy rationales for research on the spatial dynamics of such groups are advanced as a prelude to a review of the Australian literature. This review is structured around four complementary perspectives on mobility: the propensity to move; spatial redistribution; flows and networks; and migration careers. Comparison of the relative strengths of mobility research on the indigenous and non-indigenous populations against these four perspectives assists in identifying outstanding research needs and priorities. Commonalities in the patterns and processes of indigenous mobility in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the U.S. suggest the value of more detailed cross-national comparisons, and also provide a basis for contemplating an indigenous variant of Zelinsky's hypothesised mobility transition.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":73472,"journal":{"name":"International journal of population geography : IJPG","volume":"2 2","pages":"153-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Population mobility and indigenous peoples: the view from Australia.\",\"authors\":\"J Taylor,&nbsp;M Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1099-1220(199606)2:2<153::AID-IJPG19>3.0.CO;2-U\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>\\\"This paper describes an emerging field of demographic enquiry focused on the population mobility of indigenous minorities in Australasia and North America. Political, scientific and policy rationales for research on the spatial dynamics of such groups are advanced as a prelude to a review of the Australian literature. This review is structured around four complementary perspectives on mobility: the propensity to move; spatial redistribution; flows and networks; and migration careers. Comparison of the relative strengths of mobility research on the indigenous and non-indigenous populations against these four perspectives assists in identifying outstanding research needs and priorities. Commonalities in the patterns and processes of indigenous mobility in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the U.S. suggest the value of more detailed cross-national comparisons, and also provide a basis for contemplating an indigenous variant of Zelinsky's hypothesised mobility transition.\\\"</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of population geography : IJPG\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"153-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of population geography : IJPG\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1220(199606)2:2<153::AID-IJPG19>3.0.CO;2-U\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of population geography : IJPG","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1220(199606)2:2<153::AID-IJPG19>3.0.CO;2-U","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

“这篇论文描述了一个新兴的人口调查领域,重点关注澳大利亚和北美土著少数民族的人口流动。这些群体的空间动态研究的政治、科学和政策依据是作为澳大利亚文献回顾的前奏提出的。本综述围绕流动性的四个互补视角:移动倾向;空间再分配;流动和网络;以及移民事业。将土著和非土著人口流动研究的相对优势与这四种观点进行比较,有助于确定突出的研究需要和优先事项。澳大利亚、新西兰、加拿大和美国土著人口流动模式和过程的共性表明,更详细的跨国比较具有价值,也为思考泽林斯基假设的流动转变的土著变体提供了基础。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Population mobility and indigenous peoples: the view from Australia.

"This paper describes an emerging field of demographic enquiry focused on the population mobility of indigenous minorities in Australasia and North America. Political, scientific and policy rationales for research on the spatial dynamics of such groups are advanced as a prelude to a review of the Australian literature. This review is structured around four complementary perspectives on mobility: the propensity to move; spatial redistribution; flows and networks; and migration careers. Comparison of the relative strengths of mobility research on the indigenous and non-indigenous populations against these four perspectives assists in identifying outstanding research needs and priorities. Commonalities in the patterns and processes of indigenous mobility in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the U.S. suggest the value of more detailed cross-national comparisons, and also provide a basis for contemplating an indigenous variant of Zelinsky's hypothesised mobility transition."

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Population policy Economic composition Literacy and education Marital status Population–development–environment interrelations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1