全口义齿生物膜揭露剂的临床及抗菌评价

Cláudia Helena Lovato da Silva, Helena de Freitas Oliveira Paranhos, Isabel Yoko Ito
{"title":"全口义齿生物膜揭露剂的临床及抗菌评价","authors":"Cláudia Helena Lovato da Silva,&nbsp;Helena de Freitas Oliveira Paranhos,&nbsp;Isabel Yoko Ito","doi":"10.1590/s1517-74912002000300015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the disclosing ability, removal facility and antimicrobial effect of biofilm disclosing agents applied on complete dentures. Disclosing ability was evaluated by means of the visual method. The solutions were applied on the internal surface of dentures. After being photographed, the dentures were brushed with denture-specific brush and dentifrice and photographed again. The obtained slides were projected on paper (10 X amplification) and the total and stained surfaces were outlined with graphite, cut off and weighed, in order to assess removal facility. The evaluation of antimicrobial effects was carried out by means of the method of diffusion in agar, and the results were obtained by measuring the length of the halos and rings. In terms of disclosing ability, the best solutions were 0.05% methylene blue, 5% erythrosin, 1% sodic fluorescein, Replak and 1% neutral red. One percent eosin, 1% sodic fluorescein and 5% erythrosin were the most easily removed solutions. One percent eosin, 5% erythrosin, 1% sodic fluorescein, 0.3% proflavine, Replak and 1% neutral red presented no antimicrobial effect. The solutions which presented the greatest disclosing ability and removal facility as well as absence of antimicrobial effect - which are essential requirements in the assessment of hygiene methods and guidance on oral health - were 1% eosin, 1% neutral red and 5% erythrosin.</p>","PeriodicalId":35295,"journal":{"name":"Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research","volume":"16 3","pages":"270-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/s1517-74912002000300015","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Biofilm disclosing agents in complete denture: clinical and antimicrobial evaluation].\",\"authors\":\"Cláudia Helena Lovato da Silva,&nbsp;Helena de Freitas Oliveira Paranhos,&nbsp;Isabel Yoko Ito\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s1517-74912002000300015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated the disclosing ability, removal facility and antimicrobial effect of biofilm disclosing agents applied on complete dentures. Disclosing ability was evaluated by means of the visual method. The solutions were applied on the internal surface of dentures. After being photographed, the dentures were brushed with denture-specific brush and dentifrice and photographed again. The obtained slides were projected on paper (10 X amplification) and the total and stained surfaces were outlined with graphite, cut off and weighed, in order to assess removal facility. The evaluation of antimicrobial effects was carried out by means of the method of diffusion in agar, and the results were obtained by measuring the length of the halos and rings. In terms of disclosing ability, the best solutions were 0.05% methylene blue, 5% erythrosin, 1% sodic fluorescein, Replak and 1% neutral red. One percent eosin, 1% sodic fluorescein and 5% erythrosin were the most easily removed solutions. One percent eosin, 5% erythrosin, 1% sodic fluorescein, 0.3% proflavine, Replak and 1% neutral red presented no antimicrobial effect. The solutions which presented the greatest disclosing ability and removal facility as well as absence of antimicrobial effect - which are essential requirements in the assessment of hygiene methods and guidance on oral health - were 1% eosin, 1% neutral red and 5% erythrosin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"270-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/s1517-74912002000300015\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-74912002000300015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-74912002000300015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

摘要

本研究评价了生物膜揭露剂在全口义齿上的揭露能力、去除设施和抗菌效果。采用目测法评价揭示能力。将溶液应用于义齿内表面。拍摄完成后,用义齿专用刷和牙膏刷牙,再次拍摄。将获得的载玻片投影在纸上(放大10倍),用石墨勾勒出总表面和染色表面,切断并称重,以评估去除能力。采用琼脂扩散法对其抑菌效果进行评价,并通过测定光晕和环的长度来评价抑菌效果。以披露能力为指标,最佳溶液为0.05%亚甲基蓝、5%红血素、1%钠荧光素、Replak和1%中性红。1%的伊红、1%的钠荧光素和5%的红素是最容易去除的溶液。1%伊红、5%红素、1%钠荧光素、0.3%丙黄、Replak和1%中性红均无抗菌作用。1%伊红、1%中性红和5%红血素的溶液显示出最大的揭露能力和去除能力,并且没有抗菌效果,这是卫生方法评估和口腔健康指导的基本要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Biofilm disclosing agents in complete denture: clinical and antimicrobial evaluation].

This study evaluated the disclosing ability, removal facility and antimicrobial effect of biofilm disclosing agents applied on complete dentures. Disclosing ability was evaluated by means of the visual method. The solutions were applied on the internal surface of dentures. After being photographed, the dentures were brushed with denture-specific brush and dentifrice and photographed again. The obtained slides were projected on paper (10 X amplification) and the total and stained surfaces were outlined with graphite, cut off and weighed, in order to assess removal facility. The evaluation of antimicrobial effects was carried out by means of the method of diffusion in agar, and the results were obtained by measuring the length of the halos and rings. In terms of disclosing ability, the best solutions were 0.05% methylene blue, 5% erythrosin, 1% sodic fluorescein, Replak and 1% neutral red. One percent eosin, 1% sodic fluorescein and 5% erythrosin were the most easily removed solutions. One percent eosin, 5% erythrosin, 1% sodic fluorescein, 0.3% proflavine, Replak and 1% neutral red presented no antimicrobial effect. The solutions which presented the greatest disclosing ability and removal facility as well as absence of antimicrobial effect - which are essential requirements in the assessment of hygiene methods and guidance on oral health - were 1% eosin, 1% neutral red and 5% erythrosin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Pesquisa Odontológica Brasileira is a new quarterly published journal (January-March, April-June, July-September, October-December), with an annual supplement (Anais da Reunião de Pesquisa Odontológica da SBPqO), by the Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica [Brazilian Society of Odontological Research] and University of São Paulo. It replaces Revista de Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo (ISSN 0103-0663).
期刊最新文献
Metodologias de identificação de marcas de mordidas O assessor: personagem central na publicação científica Prevalence of microorganisms in root canals of human deciduous teeth with necrotic pulp and chronic periapical lesions. Effect of plaque accumulation and salivary factors on enamel demineralization and plaque composition in situ. In vitro evaluation of human dental enamel surface roughness bleached with 35% carbamide peroxide and submitted to abrasive dentifrice brushing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1