低收入拉丁美洲人异常宫颈筛查随访:项目SAFe。

Kathleen Ell, Betsy Vourlekis, Laila Muderspach, Jan Nissly, Deborah Padgett, Diana Pineda, Olga Sarabia, Pey-Jiuan Lee
{"title":"低收入拉丁美洲人异常宫颈筛查随访:项目SAFe。","authors":"Kathleen Ell,&nbsp;Betsy Vourlekis,&nbsp;Laila Muderspach,&nbsp;Jan Nissly,&nbsp;Deborah Padgett,&nbsp;Diana Pineda,&nbsp;Olga Sarabia,&nbsp;Pey-Jiuan Lee","doi":"10.1089/152460902760360586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates are dramatically higher among low-income women than in the general population, in part due to poor adherence to recommended diagnostic follow-up after an index Pap test. This report describes a pilot study of the Screening Adherence Follow-Up Program (SAFe), an individualized, structured case management program designed to assess for and intervene in response to a variety of potential personal and systems barriers to follow-up adherence. Interventions included health education, counseling, and systems navigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A clinical decision-making algorithm was used to determine service intensity and level of intervention. Services were provided to 196 low-income women, predominantly Latinas, who had either a low-grade or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LGSIL or HGSIL) abnormal Pap result. Adherence rates to at least one follow-up appointment after enrollment and baseline intervention were 83% following LGSIL and 93% for HGSIL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 1 year post-enrollment, 41% of women with LGSIL were fully adherent, with 42% partially adherent; 61% of women with HGSIL were fully adherent, with 32% partially adherent. In a comparison group of 369 nonenrollees (women who refused participation or could not be located for consent), adherence rates were 58% for LGSIL and 67% for HGSIL. A survey among a random sample of women served indicated that 93% were \"mostly\" or \"very\" satisfied, overall, with SAFe services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The intervention team--a peer counselor and a master's degreed social worker--addressed multiple psychosocial and systems navigation problems to reduce potential barriers to adherence, including knowledge, attitudinal, psychosocial, psychological distress, systems communication, and resource access problems. SAFe appears highly acceptable to women and may significantly enhance medical care management following an abnormal cervical screen for a carefully targeted group of women at risk for suboptimal follow-up adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":80044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/152460902760360586","citationCount":"93","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abnormal cervical screen follow-up among low-income Latinas: Project SAFe.\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen Ell,&nbsp;Betsy Vourlekis,&nbsp;Laila Muderspach,&nbsp;Jan Nissly,&nbsp;Deborah Padgett,&nbsp;Diana Pineda,&nbsp;Olga Sarabia,&nbsp;Pey-Jiuan Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/152460902760360586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates are dramatically higher among low-income women than in the general population, in part due to poor adherence to recommended diagnostic follow-up after an index Pap test. This report describes a pilot study of the Screening Adherence Follow-Up Program (SAFe), an individualized, structured case management program designed to assess for and intervene in response to a variety of potential personal and systems barriers to follow-up adherence. Interventions included health education, counseling, and systems navigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A clinical decision-making algorithm was used to determine service intensity and level of intervention. Services were provided to 196 low-income women, predominantly Latinas, who had either a low-grade or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LGSIL or HGSIL) abnormal Pap result. Adherence rates to at least one follow-up appointment after enrollment and baseline intervention were 83% following LGSIL and 93% for HGSIL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 1 year post-enrollment, 41% of women with LGSIL were fully adherent, with 42% partially adherent; 61% of women with HGSIL were fully adherent, with 32% partially adherent. In a comparison group of 369 nonenrollees (women who refused participation or could not be located for consent), adherence rates were 58% for LGSIL and 67% for HGSIL. A survey among a random sample of women served indicated that 93% were \\\"mostly\\\" or \\\"very\\\" satisfied, overall, with SAFe services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The intervention team--a peer counselor and a master's degreed social worker--addressed multiple psychosocial and systems navigation problems to reduce potential barriers to adherence, including knowledge, attitudinal, psychosocial, psychological distress, systems communication, and resource access problems. SAFe appears highly acceptable to women and may significantly enhance medical care management following an abnormal cervical screen for a carefully targeted group of women at risk for suboptimal follow-up adherence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/152460902760360586\",\"citationCount\":\"93\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/152460902760360586\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/152460902760360586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 93

摘要

背景:低收入妇女的宫颈癌发病率和死亡率明显高于一般人群,部分原因是在进行指数巴氏涂片检查后,对推荐的诊断随访的依从性较差。本报告描述了筛查依从性随访计划(SAFe)的试点研究,这是一个个性化的、结构化的病例管理计划,旨在评估和干预各种潜在的个人和系统障碍,以应对随访依从性。干预措施包括健康教育、咨询和系统导航。方法:采用临床决策算法确定服务强度和干预水平。196名低收入妇女,主要是拉丁裔,有低度或高等级鳞状上皮内病变(LGSIL或HGSIL)异常Pap结果。入组和基线干预后至少一次随访预约的依从率为LGSIL组83%,HGSIL组93%。结果:入组后1年多,41%的LGSIL女性完全依从,42%部分依从;61%的HGSIL女性完全坚持,32%部分坚持。在369名未参加试验的妇女(拒绝参加或无法找到同意的妇女)的对照组中,LGSIL的依从率为58%,HGSIL的依从率为67%。在接受服务的妇女中随机抽样进行的一项调查表明,93%的人总体上对外管局的服务“基本”或“非常”满意。结论:干预小组——一名同伴咨询师和一名硕士学位的社会工作者——解决了多种社会心理和系统导航问题,以减少坚持治疗的潜在障碍,包括知识、态度、社会心理、心理困扰、系统沟通和资源获取问题。对于女性来说,SAFe似乎是高度可接受的,并且对于一组有随访依从性不佳风险的女性来说,在宫颈筛查异常后,SAFe可以显著提高医疗保健管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Abnormal cervical screen follow-up among low-income Latinas: Project SAFe.

Background: Cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates are dramatically higher among low-income women than in the general population, in part due to poor adherence to recommended diagnostic follow-up after an index Pap test. This report describes a pilot study of the Screening Adherence Follow-Up Program (SAFe), an individualized, structured case management program designed to assess for and intervene in response to a variety of potential personal and systems barriers to follow-up adherence. Interventions included health education, counseling, and systems navigation.

Methods: A clinical decision-making algorithm was used to determine service intensity and level of intervention. Services were provided to 196 low-income women, predominantly Latinas, who had either a low-grade or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LGSIL or HGSIL) abnormal Pap result. Adherence rates to at least one follow-up appointment after enrollment and baseline intervention were 83% following LGSIL and 93% for HGSIL.

Results: Over 1 year post-enrollment, 41% of women with LGSIL were fully adherent, with 42% partially adherent; 61% of women with HGSIL were fully adherent, with 32% partially adherent. In a comparison group of 369 nonenrollees (women who refused participation or could not be located for consent), adherence rates were 58% for LGSIL and 67% for HGSIL. A survey among a random sample of women served indicated that 93% were "mostly" or "very" satisfied, overall, with SAFe services.

Conclusions: The intervention team--a peer counselor and a master's degreed social worker--addressed multiple psychosocial and systems navigation problems to reduce potential barriers to adherence, including knowledge, attitudinal, psychosocial, psychological distress, systems communication, and resource access problems. SAFe appears highly acceptable to women and may significantly enhance medical care management following an abnormal cervical screen for a carefully targeted group of women at risk for suboptimal follow-up adherence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Maintaining fairness: who gets funded at NIH, and is the process fair? Entertainment outreach for women's health at CDC. Toward optimal health: the experts discuss polycystic ovary syndrome. Ovarian autoimmune disease and ovarian autoantibodies. Biologic and molecular mechanisms for sex differences in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics: Part I.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1