2000年台湾门诊精神科药物使用现况。

Tung-Ping Su, Tzeng-Ji Chen, Shinn-Jang Hwang, Li-Fang Chou, Angela P Fan, Yu-Chun Chen
{"title":"2000年台湾门诊精神科药物使用现况。","authors":"Tung-Ping Su,&nbsp;Tzeng-Ji Chen,&nbsp;Shinn-Jang Hwang,&nbsp;Li-Fang Chou,&nbsp;Angela P Fan,&nbsp;Yu-Chun Chen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Development of pharmacological treatment in mental disorders has risen drastically over the past decade in Taiwan. We performed a survey of the National Health Insurance claims for outpatient psychiatric services to study the utilization of psychotropic drugs. The analysis followed the drug classification and standardized measurements proposed by the World Health Organization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sampling datasets from the National Health Insurance Research Database served as data sources. They represented 0.2% of the entire claims for outpatient medical services in 2000. The measurement units used for psychotropic drugs were either prescription volumes (drug items) or the number of defined daily doses (DDDs). To estimate the proportion of the population treated daily with psychotropic drugs, numbers of DDDs per 1000 inhabitants per day were also calculated. Beside overall description, the data of psychotropic substance prescriptions were analyzed by stratifying patient's age, physician's specialty, accreditation status of hospital, and chemical subgroup of psychotropic drugs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prescription of psychotropic drug items (n = 63,539) was 3.24% of the total drug items (n = 1,958,820) claimed. The psychotropic drugs were prescribed to 9.2% of the total patients and in 9% of the total visits. Major consumers of psychotropic drugs were between 35-74 years of age and there were more women than men. The psychiatrist was the largest group of physicians who had prescribed psychotropic drugs and contributed 18.5% of all drug items and 38.3% of total DDDs of psychotropic drugs. The number of DDDs per 1000 inhabitants per day for all kinds of psychotropic drugs was estimated to be 32.94 in Taiwan, where anxiolytics accounted 14.30, hypnotics and sedatives 10.64, antipsychotics 3.41, antidepressants 3.06 and mood stabilizers 1.43. Ordered by total DDDs, the top 10 most frequently used chemical substances were flunitrazepam, alprazolam, fludiazepam, oxazolam, lorazepam, diazepam, zolpidem, estazolam, zopiclone, and haloperidol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The usage level of psychotropic drugs in Taiwan was lower than in most industrialized countries, especially for antidepressants. The future goals are to focus on the longitudinal analysis of general trend for each psychotropic substance and to associate the pharmacoepidemiological data in parallel with the upcoming epidemiological study of mental disorders in Taiwan.</p>","PeriodicalId":24073,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi = Chinese medical journal; Free China ed","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization of psychotropic drugs in Taiwan: an overview of outpatient sector in 2000.\",\"authors\":\"Tung-Ping Su,&nbsp;Tzeng-Ji Chen,&nbsp;Shinn-Jang Hwang,&nbsp;Li-Fang Chou,&nbsp;Angela P Fan,&nbsp;Yu-Chun Chen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Development of pharmacological treatment in mental disorders has risen drastically over the past decade in Taiwan. We performed a survey of the National Health Insurance claims for outpatient psychiatric services to study the utilization of psychotropic drugs. The analysis followed the drug classification and standardized measurements proposed by the World Health Organization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sampling datasets from the National Health Insurance Research Database served as data sources. They represented 0.2% of the entire claims for outpatient medical services in 2000. The measurement units used for psychotropic drugs were either prescription volumes (drug items) or the number of defined daily doses (DDDs). To estimate the proportion of the population treated daily with psychotropic drugs, numbers of DDDs per 1000 inhabitants per day were also calculated. Beside overall description, the data of psychotropic substance prescriptions were analyzed by stratifying patient's age, physician's specialty, accreditation status of hospital, and chemical subgroup of psychotropic drugs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prescription of psychotropic drug items (n = 63,539) was 3.24% of the total drug items (n = 1,958,820) claimed. The psychotropic drugs were prescribed to 9.2% of the total patients and in 9% of the total visits. Major consumers of psychotropic drugs were between 35-74 years of age and there were more women than men. The psychiatrist was the largest group of physicians who had prescribed psychotropic drugs and contributed 18.5% of all drug items and 38.3% of total DDDs of psychotropic drugs. The number of DDDs per 1000 inhabitants per day for all kinds of psychotropic drugs was estimated to be 32.94 in Taiwan, where anxiolytics accounted 14.30, hypnotics and sedatives 10.64, antipsychotics 3.41, antidepressants 3.06 and mood stabilizers 1.43. Ordered by total DDDs, the top 10 most frequently used chemical substances were flunitrazepam, alprazolam, fludiazepam, oxazolam, lorazepam, diazepam, zolpidem, estazolam, zopiclone, and haloperidol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The usage level of psychotropic drugs in Taiwan was lower than in most industrialized countries, especially for antidepressants. The future goals are to focus on the longitudinal analysis of general trend for each psychotropic substance and to associate the pharmacoepidemiological data in parallel with the upcoming epidemiological study of mental disorders in Taiwan.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi = Chinese medical journal; Free China ed\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi = Chinese medical journal; Free China ed\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi = Chinese medical journal; Free China ed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在过去的十年里,台湾在精神障碍的药物治疗方面有了突飞猛进的发展。为了研究精神药物的使用情况,我们对精神科门诊的国民健康保险理赔情况进行了调查。该分析遵循了世界卫生组织提出的药物分类和标准化测量方法。方法:以国家健康保险研究数据库的抽样数据为数据源。他们占2000年门诊医疗服务索赔总额的0.2%。精神药物计量单位为处方量(药品项目)或限定日剂量(DDDs)。为了估计每天接受精神药物治疗的人口比例,还计算了每天每1000名居民的DDDs数。在总体描述的基础上,对精神药物处方数据进行分层分析,包括患者年龄、医师专业、医院资质、精神药物化学亚组等。结果:精神药品处方数(n = 63,539)占总申报药品数(n = 1,958,820)的3.24%。9.2%的患者使用精神药物,9%的患者使用精神药物。精神药物的主要消费者年龄在35-74岁之间,女性多于男性。精神科医生是开精神科药物最多的医师群体,占所有药物种类的18.5%和总DDDs的38.3%。各类精神药物每日每千居民DDDs数估计为32.94,其中抗焦虑药14.30,催眠及镇静剂10.64,抗精神病药3.41,抗抑郁药3.06,情绪稳定剂1.43。按总DDDs排序,最常用的10种化学物质为氟硝西泮、阿普唑仑、氟地西泮、恶唑唑仑、劳拉西泮、地西泮、唑吡坦、艾司唑仑、佐匹克隆和氟哌啶醇。结论:台湾地区精神药物使用率低于大多数工业发达国家,尤其是抗抑郁药物使用率较低。未来的目标是著重于对每种精神药物的总体趋势进行纵向分析,并将药物流行病学资料与台湾即将进行的精神障碍流行病学研究相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Utilization of psychotropic drugs in Taiwan: an overview of outpatient sector in 2000.

Background: Development of pharmacological treatment in mental disorders has risen drastically over the past decade in Taiwan. We performed a survey of the National Health Insurance claims for outpatient psychiatric services to study the utilization of psychotropic drugs. The analysis followed the drug classification and standardized measurements proposed by the World Health Organization.

Methods: The sampling datasets from the National Health Insurance Research Database served as data sources. They represented 0.2% of the entire claims for outpatient medical services in 2000. The measurement units used for psychotropic drugs were either prescription volumes (drug items) or the number of defined daily doses (DDDs). To estimate the proportion of the population treated daily with psychotropic drugs, numbers of DDDs per 1000 inhabitants per day were also calculated. Beside overall description, the data of psychotropic substance prescriptions were analyzed by stratifying patient's age, physician's specialty, accreditation status of hospital, and chemical subgroup of psychotropic drugs.

Results: Prescription of psychotropic drug items (n = 63,539) was 3.24% of the total drug items (n = 1,958,820) claimed. The psychotropic drugs were prescribed to 9.2% of the total patients and in 9% of the total visits. Major consumers of psychotropic drugs were between 35-74 years of age and there were more women than men. The psychiatrist was the largest group of physicians who had prescribed psychotropic drugs and contributed 18.5% of all drug items and 38.3% of total DDDs of psychotropic drugs. The number of DDDs per 1000 inhabitants per day for all kinds of psychotropic drugs was estimated to be 32.94 in Taiwan, where anxiolytics accounted 14.30, hypnotics and sedatives 10.64, antipsychotics 3.41, antidepressants 3.06 and mood stabilizers 1.43. Ordered by total DDDs, the top 10 most frequently used chemical substances were flunitrazepam, alprazolam, fludiazepam, oxazolam, lorazepam, diazepam, zolpidem, estazolam, zopiclone, and haloperidol.

Conclusions: The usage level of psychotropic drugs in Taiwan was lower than in most industrialized countries, especially for antidepressants. The future goals are to focus on the longitudinal analysis of general trend for each psychotropic substance and to associate the pharmacoepidemiological data in parallel with the upcoming epidemiological study of mental disorders in Taiwan.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Congenital muscular dystrophy. Autoimmune hepatitis: truly a rare disorder in Taiwan. Characteristics of autoimmune hepatitis in Taiwan: the 11 years' experiences of a medical center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1