MEDLINE临床内容的经验搜索策略的稳健性。

Proceedings. AMIA Symposium Pub Date : 2002-01-01
Nancy L Wilczynski, R Brian Haynes
{"title":"MEDLINE临床内容的经验搜索策略的稳健性。","authors":"Nancy L Wilczynski,&nbsp;R Brian Haynes","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is important for clinical end users of MEDLINE to be able to retrieve articles that are both scientifically sound and directly relevant to clinical practice. The use of methodologic search filters (such as \"random allocation\" for sound studies of medical interventions) has been advocated to improve the accuracy of searching for such studies. Methodologic search filters have been tested in previous MEDLINE files but indexing continues to evolve and the operating characteristics of these search filters in current MEDLINE files are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the robustness of empirical search strategies developed in 1991 for detecting clinical content in MEDLINE in the year 2000.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A survey based on a hand search of 171 core health care journals using predetermined quality indicators for scientific merit and clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>6 trained, experienced research assistants read all issues of 171 journals for the publishing year 2000. Each article was rated using purpose and quality indicators and categorized into clinically relevant original studies, review articles, general papers, or case reports. The original and review articles were then categorized as 'pass' or 'fail' for methodologic rigor in the areas of therapy/quality improvement, diagnosis, prognosis, causation, economics, clinical prediction, and qualitative and review articles. Search strategies developed in 1991 were tested in the 2000 database.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Sensitivity, specificity, precision, and accuracy of the search strategies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Search strategies developed in 1991 generally performed at least as well in 2000 for both best single terms and combinations of terms for high-sensitivity MEDLINE searches for studies of treatment, prognosis, etiology and diagnosis. For example, the accuracy of \"clinical trial (pt)\" rose from 91.6% to 94.4% (P<0.05) for retrieving high-quality studies of treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most MEDLINE search strategies developed in 1991 are robust when searching in the publishing year 2000.</p>","PeriodicalId":79712,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. AMIA Symposium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2244303/pdf/procamiasymp00001-0945.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robustness of empirical search strategies for clinical content in MEDLINE.\",\"authors\":\"Nancy L Wilczynski,&nbsp;R Brian Haynes\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is important for clinical end users of MEDLINE to be able to retrieve articles that are both scientifically sound and directly relevant to clinical practice. The use of methodologic search filters (such as \\\"random allocation\\\" for sound studies of medical interventions) has been advocated to improve the accuracy of searching for such studies. Methodologic search filters have been tested in previous MEDLINE files but indexing continues to evolve and the operating characteristics of these search filters in current MEDLINE files are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the robustness of empirical search strategies developed in 1991 for detecting clinical content in MEDLINE in the year 2000.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A survey based on a hand search of 171 core health care journals using predetermined quality indicators for scientific merit and clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>6 trained, experienced research assistants read all issues of 171 journals for the publishing year 2000. Each article was rated using purpose and quality indicators and categorized into clinically relevant original studies, review articles, general papers, or case reports. The original and review articles were then categorized as 'pass' or 'fail' for methodologic rigor in the areas of therapy/quality improvement, diagnosis, prognosis, causation, economics, clinical prediction, and qualitative and review articles. Search strategies developed in 1991 were tested in the 2000 database.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Sensitivity, specificity, precision, and accuracy of the search strategies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Search strategies developed in 1991 generally performed at least as well in 2000 for both best single terms and combinations of terms for high-sensitivity MEDLINE searches for studies of treatment, prognosis, etiology and diagnosis. For example, the accuracy of \\\"clinical trial (pt)\\\" rose from 91.6% to 94.4% (P<0.05) for retrieving high-quality studies of treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most MEDLINE search strategies developed in 1991 are robust when searching in the publishing year 2000.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79712,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. AMIA Symposium\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2244303/pdf/procamiasymp00001-0945.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. AMIA Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. AMIA Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于MEDLINE的临床终端用户来说,能够检索既科学合理又与临床实践直接相关的文章是很重要的。有人提倡使用方法学搜索过滤器(例如对医疗干预措施的可靠研究进行“随机分配”),以提高搜索此类研究的准确性。方法搜索过滤器已经在以前的MEDLINE文件中进行了测试,但索引仍在不断发展,这些搜索过滤器在当前MEDLINE文件中的操作特性尚不清楚。目的:确定1991年开发的用于检测2000年MEDLINE临床内容的实证搜索策略的稳健性。设计:采用预先确定的科学价值和临床相关性质量指标,对171种核心卫生保健期刊进行手工检索。方法:6名训练有素、经验丰富的研究助理阅读了2000年出版的171种期刊的所有问题。每篇文章使用目的和质量指标进行评级,并分类为临床相关的原始研究、综述文章、一般论文或病例报告。然后根据治疗/质量改进、诊断、预后、因果关系、经济学、临床预测、定性和综述文章的方法学严密性,将原始文章和综述文章分类为“合格”或“不合格”。1991年开发的搜索策略在2000年的数据库中进行了测试。主要结果测量:搜索策略的敏感性、特异性、精确性和准确性。结果:对于治疗、预后、病因和诊断研究的高灵敏度MEDLINE搜索,1991年开发的搜索策略总体上至少在2000年表现良好,无论是最佳单一术语还是术语组合。例如,“临床试验(pt)”的准确性从91.6%上升到94.4%(结论:1991年开发的大多数MEDLINE搜索策略在检索2000年出版年份时是稳健的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robustness of empirical search strategies for clinical content in MEDLINE.

Background: It is important for clinical end users of MEDLINE to be able to retrieve articles that are both scientifically sound and directly relevant to clinical practice. The use of methodologic search filters (such as "random allocation" for sound studies of medical interventions) has been advocated to improve the accuracy of searching for such studies. Methodologic search filters have been tested in previous MEDLINE files but indexing continues to evolve and the operating characteristics of these search filters in current MEDLINE files are unknown.

Objective: To determine the robustness of empirical search strategies developed in 1991 for detecting clinical content in MEDLINE in the year 2000.

Design: A survey based on a hand search of 171 core health care journals using predetermined quality indicators for scientific merit and clinical relevance.

Methods: 6 trained, experienced research assistants read all issues of 171 journals for the publishing year 2000. Each article was rated using purpose and quality indicators and categorized into clinically relevant original studies, review articles, general papers, or case reports. The original and review articles were then categorized as 'pass' or 'fail' for methodologic rigor in the areas of therapy/quality improvement, diagnosis, prognosis, causation, economics, clinical prediction, and qualitative and review articles. Search strategies developed in 1991 were tested in the 2000 database.

Main outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity, precision, and accuracy of the search strategies.

Results: Search strategies developed in 1991 generally performed at least as well in 2000 for both best single terms and combinations of terms for high-sensitivity MEDLINE searches for studies of treatment, prognosis, etiology and diagnosis. For example, the accuracy of "clinical trial (pt)" rose from 91.6% to 94.4% (P<0.05) for retrieving high-quality studies of treatments.

Conclusion: Most MEDLINE search strategies developed in 1991 are robust when searching in the publishing year 2000.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Electronic Patient Record Medical informatics as a market for IS/IT Perceived Information Needs and Communication Difficulties of Inpatient Physicians and Nurses Disambiguation Data: Extracting Information from Anonymized Sources The Operating Room Charge Nurse: Coordinator and Communicator
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1