[西班牙瓦伦西亚社区新生儿死亡原因]。

Anales Espanoles De Pediatria Pub Date : 2002-12-01
R Tosca Segura, R Aguilera Olmos, J Bellido Blasco
{"title":"[西班牙瓦伦西亚社区新生儿死亡原因]。","authors":"R Tosca Segura,&nbsp;R Aguilera Olmos,&nbsp;J Bellido Blasco","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives To describe the causes of neonatal mortality in the Community of Valencia (VC) and to compare two registration systems for causes of death: that of the Spanish Society of Neonatology and that of the Word Health Organization's \"Statistical Bulletin of Deaths (SBD)\".MethodsData related to death from the SSN's mortality form, which orders all the diagnoses according to their severity, and data from the SBD, which uses sequential criteria (basic, intermediate or immediate cause of death) were obtained. Both systems were joined in a single form. Data from 19 hospitals in the Community of Valencia (1998-99) were collected. Two features were compared: a) \"single cause of death\" meaning the first diagnosis of the SSN system versus the \"basic cause\" of the SBD; and b) \"multidiagnosis\", which compares all the diagnoses mentioned anywhere in either of the two systems.ResultsA total of 206 neonatal deaths were included. When using the \"basic cause\" criterion the most common causes of death were malformations (31 %), respiratory distress syndrome (20 %) and extreme prematurity (10 %). However, when applying the \"first diagnosis\" criterion, the most common causes were respiratory distress syndrome (34 %), malformations (33 %) and asphyxia (9 %). These differences were statistically significant. When the causes of death were compared using the \"multidiagnosis\" criterion the differences were greater.ConclusionsThe two systems differ qualitatively and quantitatively. The SSN form is useful for studying prevalent morbidity among deaths as well as other parameters, but it may fail to identify the causes of death. The SBD uses more explicit criteria for the causes of death. Thus, both systems should be complementary.</p>","PeriodicalId":7778,"journal":{"name":"Anales Espanoles De Pediatria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Causes of neonatal death in the community of Valencia (Spain)].\",\"authors\":\"R Tosca Segura,&nbsp;R Aguilera Olmos,&nbsp;J Bellido Blasco\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objectives To describe the causes of neonatal mortality in the Community of Valencia (VC) and to compare two registration systems for causes of death: that of the Spanish Society of Neonatology and that of the Word Health Organization's \\\"Statistical Bulletin of Deaths (SBD)\\\".MethodsData related to death from the SSN's mortality form, which orders all the diagnoses according to their severity, and data from the SBD, which uses sequential criteria (basic, intermediate or immediate cause of death) were obtained. Both systems were joined in a single form. Data from 19 hospitals in the Community of Valencia (1998-99) were collected. Two features were compared: a) \\\"single cause of death\\\" meaning the first diagnosis of the SSN system versus the \\\"basic cause\\\" of the SBD; and b) \\\"multidiagnosis\\\", which compares all the diagnoses mentioned anywhere in either of the two systems.ResultsA total of 206 neonatal deaths were included. When using the \\\"basic cause\\\" criterion the most common causes of death were malformations (31 %), respiratory distress syndrome (20 %) and extreme prematurity (10 %). However, when applying the \\\"first diagnosis\\\" criterion, the most common causes were respiratory distress syndrome (34 %), malformations (33 %) and asphyxia (9 %). These differences were statistically significant. When the causes of death were compared using the \\\"multidiagnosis\\\" criterion the differences were greater.ConclusionsThe two systems differ qualitatively and quantitatively. The SSN form is useful for studying prevalent morbidity among deaths as well as other parameters, but it may fail to identify the causes of death. The SBD uses more explicit criteria for the causes of death. Thus, both systems should be complementary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anales Espanoles De Pediatria\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anales Espanoles De Pediatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales Espanoles De Pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的描述瓦伦西亚社区(VC)新生儿死亡的原因,并比较两种死因登记系统:西班牙新生儿学会和世界卫生组织的“死亡统计公报(SBD)”。方法从SSN死亡表和SBD中获得死亡相关数据,前者根据严重程度对所有诊断进行排序,后者采用顺序标准(基本死亡、中间死亡或直接死亡)。这两个系统以一种形式结合在一起。收集了瓦伦西亚社区19家医院(1998- 1999年)的数据。比较两个特征:a)"单一死因"指的是社会安全保险系统的首次诊断与SBD的"基本原因";和b)“多重诊断”,它比较了两个系统中任何地方提到的所有诊断。结果共纳入新生儿死亡206例。当使用"基本原因"标准时,最常见的死亡原因是畸形(31%)、呼吸窘迫综合征(20%)和极度早产(10%)。然而,当应用“首次诊断”标准时,最常见的原因是呼吸窘迫综合征(34%)、畸形(33%)和窒息(9%)。这些差异具有统计学意义。当使用“多重诊断”标准比较死亡原因时,差异更大。结论两种系统在质量和数量上存在差异。社会安全指数表格有助于研究死亡中的普遍发病率以及其他参数,但它可能无法确定死亡原因。SBD使用更明确的死因标准。因此,这两个系统应该是互补的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Causes of neonatal death in the community of Valencia (Spain)].

Objectives To describe the causes of neonatal mortality in the Community of Valencia (VC) and to compare two registration systems for causes of death: that of the Spanish Society of Neonatology and that of the Word Health Organization's "Statistical Bulletin of Deaths (SBD)".MethodsData related to death from the SSN's mortality form, which orders all the diagnoses according to their severity, and data from the SBD, which uses sequential criteria (basic, intermediate or immediate cause of death) were obtained. Both systems were joined in a single form. Data from 19 hospitals in the Community of Valencia (1998-99) were collected. Two features were compared: a) "single cause of death" meaning the first diagnosis of the SSN system versus the "basic cause" of the SBD; and b) "multidiagnosis", which compares all the diagnoses mentioned anywhere in either of the two systems.ResultsA total of 206 neonatal deaths were included. When using the "basic cause" criterion the most common causes of death were malformations (31 %), respiratory distress syndrome (20 %) and extreme prematurity (10 %). However, when applying the "first diagnosis" criterion, the most common causes were respiratory distress syndrome (34 %), malformations (33 %) and asphyxia (9 %). These differences were statistically significant. When the causes of death were compared using the "multidiagnosis" criterion the differences were greater.ConclusionsThe two systems differ qualitatively and quantitatively. The SSN form is useful for studying prevalent morbidity among deaths as well as other parameters, but it may fail to identify the causes of death. The SBD uses more explicit criteria for the causes of death. Thus, both systems should be complementary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Ellis-Van Creveld syndrome]. [McCune-Albright syndrome]. [Tympanometry]. [Sandhoff disease]. [Diabetic retinopathy].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1