美国过敏,哮喘学院[amp]免疫学斑贴试验和过敏性皮肤病调查:斑贴试验的使用和教育对信心,态度和使用的影响

Luz Fonacier, Ernest M. Charlesworth, Wang Y. Mak, Sami L. Bahna
{"title":"美国过敏,哮喘学院[amp]免疫学斑贴试验和过敏性皮肤病调查:斑贴试验的使用和教育对信心,态度和使用的影响","authors":"Luz Fonacier,&nbsp;Ernest M. Charlesworth,&nbsp;Wang Y. Mak,&nbsp;Sami L. Bahna","doi":"10.1053/ajcd.2002.36639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Background:</strong> The patch test is an important tool for the diagnosis of contact dermatitis. In the past few years, allergists have shown increased interest in the diagnosis of contact dermatitis and the use of patch testing. <strong>Objective:</strong> The aim of this study was to determine (1) the frequency of usage of the patch test among allergists, (2) the factors that affect the decision to patch test, and (3) the need for training the allergist to perform patch testing. <strong>Method:</strong> A single mailing survey was sent to all the members of the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (ACAAI). <strong>Results:</strong> Fifty-seven percent of responding allergists performed patch testing but did so infrequently. Those who were fellowship trained in patch testing or attended a sponsored workshop performed the test more frequently than those with no training. Those who perceived the patch test as useful also were more likely to perform the test. Fellowship-trained members felt more confident than workshop-trained members in performing the test, and both, in turn, were more confident than members with no training. Trained physicians also were more likely to find the test useful compared with those with no training in patch testing. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> Education through fellowship training and workshop was associated with greater self-confidence of the allergist in his/her ability to perform patch testing. Education also was associated with increased perception of patch test utility and increased usage of the test.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7653,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Contact Dermatitis","volume":"13 4","pages":"Pages 164-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1053/ajcd.2002.36639","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"American college of allergy, asthma [amp ] immunology patch testing and allergic dermatologic disease survey: Use of patch testing and effect of education on confidence, attitude, and usage\",\"authors\":\"Luz Fonacier,&nbsp;Ernest M. Charlesworth,&nbsp;Wang Y. Mak,&nbsp;Sami L. Bahna\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/ajcd.2002.36639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><strong>Background:</strong> The patch test is an important tool for the diagnosis of contact dermatitis. In the past few years, allergists have shown increased interest in the diagnosis of contact dermatitis and the use of patch testing. <strong>Objective:</strong> The aim of this study was to determine (1) the frequency of usage of the patch test among allergists, (2) the factors that affect the decision to patch test, and (3) the need for training the allergist to perform patch testing. <strong>Method:</strong> A single mailing survey was sent to all the members of the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (ACAAI). <strong>Results:</strong> Fifty-seven percent of responding allergists performed patch testing but did so infrequently. Those who were fellowship trained in patch testing or attended a sponsored workshop performed the test more frequently than those with no training. Those who perceived the patch test as useful also were more likely to perform the test. Fellowship-trained members felt more confident than workshop-trained members in performing the test, and both, in turn, were more confident than members with no training. Trained physicians also were more likely to find the test useful compared with those with no training in patch testing. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> Education through fellowship training and workshop was associated with greater self-confidence of the allergist in his/her ability to perform patch testing. Education also was associated with increased perception of patch test utility and increased usage of the test.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Contact Dermatitis\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 164-169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1053/ajcd.2002.36639\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Contact Dermatitis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1046199X02000222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Contact Dermatitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1046199X02000222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

背景:斑贴试验是诊断接触性皮炎的重要手段。在过去的几年里,过敏症专家对接触性皮炎的诊断和斑贴试验的使用越来越感兴趣。目的:本研究的目的是确定(1)过敏专科医生使用斑贴试验的频率,(2)影响斑贴试验决定的因素,以及(3)对过敏专科医生进行斑贴试验培训的必要性。方法:向美国过敏、哮喘和免疫学学会(ACAAI)的所有成员发送一份邮寄调查。结果:57%的应答过敏症专家进行了斑贴测试,但不经常这样做。那些在补丁测试方面接受过奖学金培训或参加过赞助研讨会的人比那些没有接受过培训的人更频繁地进行测试。那些认为补丁测试有用的人也更有可能进行测试。接受过奖学金培训的成员在进行测试时比接受过讲习班培训的成员更有信心,而这两者又比没有接受过培训的成员更有信心。与没有接受过补丁测试培训的医生相比,受过培训的医生也更有可能发现这种测试很有用。结论:通过奖学金培训和研讨会的教育与过敏症专科医生对他/她进行贴片试验的能力的更大自信有关。教育也与补丁测试效用的认知增加和测试的使用增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
American college of allergy, asthma [amp ] immunology patch testing and allergic dermatologic disease survey: Use of patch testing and effect of education on confidence, attitude, and usage

Background: The patch test is an important tool for the diagnosis of contact dermatitis. In the past few years, allergists have shown increased interest in the diagnosis of contact dermatitis and the use of patch testing. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine (1) the frequency of usage of the patch test among allergists, (2) the factors that affect the decision to patch test, and (3) the need for training the allergist to perform patch testing. Method: A single mailing survey was sent to all the members of the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (ACAAI). Results: Fifty-seven percent of responding allergists performed patch testing but did so infrequently. Those who were fellowship trained in patch testing or attended a sponsored workshop performed the test more frequently than those with no training. Those who perceived the patch test as useful also were more likely to perform the test. Fellowship-trained members felt more confident than workshop-trained members in performing the test, and both, in turn, were more confident than members with no training. Trained physicians also were more likely to find the test useful compared with those with no training in patch testing. Conclusions: Education through fellowship training and workshop was associated with greater self-confidence of the allergist in his/her ability to perform patch testing. Education also was associated with increased perception of patch test utility and increased usage of the test.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS OF THE FEET LONG-TERM STUDY ON PRIMARY PREVENTION OF IRRITANT CONTACT DERMATITIS A REVIEW OF PATCH TESTING WITH PRESERVATIVES AT ST. JOHNʼS INSTITUTE OF DERMATOLOGY FROM 1995 TO 2000 CONTACT ALLERGY TO METAL AND TOTAL JOINT ARTHROPLASTY QUALITY OF LIFE ANALYSIS IN PATIENTS WITH HAND DERMATITIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1