评估儿科医院用药系统的流程变化。

Outcomes management Pub Date : 2002-01-01
Barbara L Marino, Patricia Branowicki, James A Bennett, Kathleen Houlahan, Jill Brace O'Neill, Jeanne L Dwyer, Amy Billett
{"title":"评估儿科医院用药系统的流程变化。","authors":"Barbara L Marino,&nbsp;Patricia Branowicki,&nbsp;James A Bennett,&nbsp;Kathleen Houlahan,&nbsp;Jill Brace O'Neill,&nbsp;Jeanne L Dwyer,&nbsp;Amy Billett","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article describes a process change designed to increase the safety of prescribing and interpreting complex order sets. All chemotherapy orders written for pediatric oncology patients at a major teaching hospital in the Eastern United States and the affiliated ambulatory clinic from June 1998 through February 2000 (n = 1792) were reviewed to evaluate a new process for communication of chemotherapy orders. The multidisciplinary check (MDC) is a forum where all disciplines simultaneously review and change complex order sets. Evaluation of the MDC included monthly completion rate and classification of changes made to orders at MDC. Over the study period, 96% of eligible orders received a multidisciplinary check, and 44% were changed. The most common change was to clarify discrepancies between the order and the protocol. Changes were made to avoid medication errors in 99 of 451 orders. Changes to avoid medication errors were more likely to involve nonchemotherapy medications. The MDC is an efficient and feasible process to increase safety at the beginning of the medication system.</p>","PeriodicalId":83840,"journal":{"name":"Outcomes management","volume":"6 1","pages":"10-5; quiz 16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating process changes in a pediatric hospital medication system.\",\"authors\":\"Barbara L Marino,&nbsp;Patricia Branowicki,&nbsp;James A Bennett,&nbsp;Kathleen Houlahan,&nbsp;Jill Brace O'Neill,&nbsp;Jeanne L Dwyer,&nbsp;Amy Billett\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article describes a process change designed to increase the safety of prescribing and interpreting complex order sets. All chemotherapy orders written for pediatric oncology patients at a major teaching hospital in the Eastern United States and the affiliated ambulatory clinic from June 1998 through February 2000 (n = 1792) were reviewed to evaluate a new process for communication of chemotherapy orders. The multidisciplinary check (MDC) is a forum where all disciplines simultaneously review and change complex order sets. Evaluation of the MDC included monthly completion rate and classification of changes made to orders at MDC. Over the study period, 96% of eligible orders received a multidisciplinary check, and 44% were changed. The most common change was to clarify discrepancies between the order and the protocol. Changes were made to avoid medication errors in 99 of 451 orders. Changes to avoid medication errors were more likely to involve nonchemotherapy medications. The MDC is an efficient and feasible process to increase safety at the beginning of the medication system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":83840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Outcomes management\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"10-5; quiz 16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Outcomes management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Outcomes management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文描述了一个流程变更,旨在提高开处方和解释复杂订单集的安全性。本研究回顾了1998年6月至2000年2月期间美国东部一家大型教学医院及其附属门诊儿科肿瘤患者的所有化疗医嘱(n = 1792),以评估化疗医嘱沟通的新流程。多学科检查(MDC)是所有学科同时审查和更改复杂订单集的论坛。对MDC的评估包括每月完成率和对MDC订单变更的分类。在研究期间,96%的合格订单接受了多学科检查,44%的订单被更改。最常见的变化是澄清命令和协议之间的差异。在451份订单中,有99份做出了避免用药错误的改变。避免用药错误的改变更可能涉及非化疗药物。MDC是一种有效和可行的过程,可以在药物系统开始时提高安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating process changes in a pediatric hospital medication system.

This article describes a process change designed to increase the safety of prescribing and interpreting complex order sets. All chemotherapy orders written for pediatric oncology patients at a major teaching hospital in the Eastern United States and the affiliated ambulatory clinic from June 1998 through February 2000 (n = 1792) were reviewed to evaluate a new process for communication of chemotherapy orders. The multidisciplinary check (MDC) is a forum where all disciplines simultaneously review and change complex order sets. Evaluation of the MDC included monthly completion rate and classification of changes made to orders at MDC. Over the study period, 96% of eligible orders received a multidisciplinary check, and 44% were changed. The most common change was to clarify discrepancies between the order and the protocol. Changes were made to avoid medication errors in 99 of 451 orders. Changes to avoid medication errors were more likely to involve nonchemotherapy medications. The MDC is an efficient and feasible process to increase safety at the beginning of the medication system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Postdischarge outcome rates influenced by comorbidity and interdisciplinary collaboration. Hospitalized elders: changes in functional and mental status. Academic nurse-managed centers: approaches to evaluation. Leading and succeeding in outcomes management. Symptom management intervention in elderly coronary artery bypass graft patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1