镇痛药使用的流行病学:性别视角。

D Isacson, K Bingefors
{"title":"镇痛药使用的流行病学:性别视角。","authors":"D Isacson,&nbsp;K Bingefors","doi":"10.1097/00003643-200219261-00003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Women consistently report significantly more frequent analgesic use in epidemiological studies. The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of medical and non-medical factors on the difference in use of analgesics between women and men from a population perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional survey. Postal questionnaires were sent to a random sample of the general population in the country of Uppland, Sweden (5404 answered the questionnaire, response rate: 68%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>34.8% of the women and 21.4% of the men had used analgesics during the two week recall period (Odds Ratio = 1.96). Social structure, social status, marital status, educational level, economic situation, lifestyle, attitudes toward drugs, medication knowledge and self-care orientation were of minor importance for the difference in use between women and men. Difference in prevalence of various types of pain and ache and the degree of pain experienced were the most influential factors affecting the difference in use. However, when all factors were analysed there remained a substantial difference in use between women and men (OR = 1.39, CI (95%) 1.20 to 1.60).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the population, women use analgesics much more frequently than men. Consequently women may be at greater risk for adverse effects and dependency. Some of the gender difference is explained by the greater frequency of pain conditions among women, but a significant difference in use still remains to be explained.</p>","PeriodicalId":11873,"journal":{"name":"European journal of anaesthesiology. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00003643-200219261-00003","citationCount":"94","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epidemiology of analgesic use: a gender perspective.\",\"authors\":\"D Isacson,&nbsp;K Bingefors\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/00003643-200219261-00003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Women consistently report significantly more frequent analgesic use in epidemiological studies. The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of medical and non-medical factors on the difference in use of analgesics between women and men from a population perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional survey. Postal questionnaires were sent to a random sample of the general population in the country of Uppland, Sweden (5404 answered the questionnaire, response rate: 68%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>34.8% of the women and 21.4% of the men had used analgesics during the two week recall period (Odds Ratio = 1.96). Social structure, social status, marital status, educational level, economic situation, lifestyle, attitudes toward drugs, medication knowledge and self-care orientation were of minor importance for the difference in use between women and men. Difference in prevalence of various types of pain and ache and the degree of pain experienced were the most influential factors affecting the difference in use. However, when all factors were analysed there remained a substantial difference in use between women and men (OR = 1.39, CI (95%) 1.20 to 1.60).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the population, women use analgesics much more frequently than men. Consequently women may be at greater risk for adverse effects and dependency. Some of the gender difference is explained by the greater frequency of pain conditions among women, but a significant difference in use still remains to be explained.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of anaesthesiology. Supplement\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00003643-200219261-00003\",\"citationCount\":\"94\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of anaesthesiology. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/00003643-200219261-00003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of anaesthesiology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00003643-200219261-00003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 94

摘要

背景和目的:在流行病学研究中,妇女一致报告了明显更频繁地使用止痛药。本研究的目的是从人口角度分析医疗和非医疗因素对男女使用镇痛药差异的影响。方法:横断面调查。通过邮寄方式随机抽取瑞典Uppland地区的普通人群进行问卷调查(5404人回答了问卷,回复率68%)。结果:34.8%的女性和21.4%的男性在2周的回忆期内使用过镇痛药(优势比= 1.96)。社会结构、社会地位、婚姻状况、文化程度、经济状况、生活方式、药物态度、用药知识和自我保健倾向对男女用药差异影响较小。不同类型疼痛和疼痛的患病率和疼痛程度的差异是影响使用差异的最重要因素。然而,当分析所有因素时,女性和男性之间的使用仍然存在实质性差异(OR = 1.39, CI(95%) 1.20至1.60)。结论:在人群中,女性使用镇痛药的频率远高于男性。因此,妇女可能面临更大的不良影响和依赖风险。一些性别差异可以用女性更频繁地出现疼痛状况来解释,但在使用上的显著差异仍有待解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Epidemiology of analgesic use: a gender perspective.

Background and objective: Women consistently report significantly more frequent analgesic use in epidemiological studies. The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of medical and non-medical factors on the difference in use of analgesics between women and men from a population perspective.

Methods: Cross-sectional survey. Postal questionnaires were sent to a random sample of the general population in the country of Uppland, Sweden (5404 answered the questionnaire, response rate: 68%).

Results: 34.8% of the women and 21.4% of the men had used analgesics during the two week recall period (Odds Ratio = 1.96). Social structure, social status, marital status, educational level, economic situation, lifestyle, attitudes toward drugs, medication knowledge and self-care orientation were of minor importance for the difference in use between women and men. Difference in prevalence of various types of pain and ache and the degree of pain experienced were the most influential factors affecting the difference in use. However, when all factors were analysed there remained a substantial difference in use between women and men (OR = 1.39, CI (95%) 1.20 to 1.60).

Conclusions: In the population, women use analgesics much more frequently than men. Consequently women may be at greater risk for adverse effects and dependency. Some of the gender difference is explained by the greater frequency of pain conditions among women, but a significant difference in use still remains to be explained.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in a piglet model: readings are influenced by the colour of the cover Clinical sedation and bispectral index in burn children receiving gamma-hydroxybutyrate. Acute Normovolemic hemodilution during CABG induces diastolic dysfunction: A perioperative transesophageal echocardiographic study EuroNeuro 2010. Abstracts of the 6th EuroNeuro Congress. Porto, Portugal. February 4-6, 2010. 5th EuroNeuro 2008. Maastricht, The Netherlands. January 16-19, 2008. Abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1