{"title":"评估管理医疗市场在编码准确性报告中的变化。","authors":"Daniel P Lorence, Amanda Spink, Robert Jameson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The implementation of larger, faster and more comprehensive databases in healthcare delivery settings is an emerging outgrowth of evidence-based medicine. This study seeks to assess, at a national level, the degree of uniformity across markets in utilization and management of coded medical information. Implications for managers and policymakers, related to comparative managed care data benchmarks, are reviewed.</p>","PeriodicalId":79681,"journal":{"name":"Managed care quarterly","volume":"10 4","pages":"15-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing managed care market variation in reports of coding accuracy.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel P Lorence, Amanda Spink, Robert Jameson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The implementation of larger, faster and more comprehensive databases in healthcare delivery settings is an emerging outgrowth of evidence-based medicine. This study seeks to assess, at a national level, the degree of uniformity across markets in utilization and management of coded medical information. Implications for managers and policymakers, related to comparative managed care data benchmarks, are reviewed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Managed care quarterly\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"15-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Managed care quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managed care quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing managed care market variation in reports of coding accuracy.
The implementation of larger, faster and more comprehensive databases in healthcare delivery settings is an emerging outgrowth of evidence-based medicine. This study seeks to assess, at a national level, the degree of uniformity across markets in utilization and management of coded medical information. Implications for managers and policymakers, related to comparative managed care data benchmarks, are reviewed.