布洛芬混悬剂在儿童中的安全性。

Samuel M Lesko
{"title":"布洛芬混悬剂在儿童中的安全性。","authors":"Samuel M Lesko","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper describes two studies in children with fever in which the safety of ibuprofen was compared with that of paracetamol. The Boston University Fever Study aimed to assess the risk of rare but serious adverse events in febrile children. There were 795 admissions among 84,192 children during the study. There were no significant differences between the drugs in the risk of admission or the risk of secondary endpoints (admissions for asthma or cellulitis, or physician visits for abdominal pain or dyspepsia) and no evidence of clinically significant impairment of renal function. However, ibuprofen was associated with a significantly lower risk of physician visits for asthma: the incidence associated with ibuprofen was 3.0% (CI95% 2.1, 4.1) compared with 5.1% (CI95% 3.5, 7.1) for paracetamol (P = 0.02). The second study was a case control study to investigate a possible association between antipyretic medication, varicella infection and necrotising fasciitis. We identified 52 children aged under 19 years who were admitted to hospital with varicella and Group A streptococcal infection and 172 matched controls with uncomplicated varicella. The risk of invasive Group A streptococcal infection was associated with demographic and environmental factors and persistent high fever. There was no association with the use of ibuprofen or paracetamol alone, but the use of both agents was significantly associated with streptococcal infection. These studies demonstrate that children with fever tolerate treatment with ibuprofen as well as treatment with paracetamol. Neither agent is associated with an increased risk of necrotising soft tissue infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":73436,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The safety of ibuprofen suspension in children.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel M Lesko\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper describes two studies in children with fever in which the safety of ibuprofen was compared with that of paracetamol. The Boston University Fever Study aimed to assess the risk of rare but serious adverse events in febrile children. There were 795 admissions among 84,192 children during the study. There were no significant differences between the drugs in the risk of admission or the risk of secondary endpoints (admissions for asthma or cellulitis, or physician visits for abdominal pain or dyspepsia) and no evidence of clinically significant impairment of renal function. However, ibuprofen was associated with a significantly lower risk of physician visits for asthma: the incidence associated with ibuprofen was 3.0% (CI95% 2.1, 4.1) compared with 5.1% (CI95% 3.5, 7.1) for paracetamol (P = 0.02). The second study was a case control study to investigate a possible association between antipyretic medication, varicella infection and necrotising fasciitis. We identified 52 children aged under 19 years who were admitted to hospital with varicella and Group A streptococcal infection and 172 matched controls with uncomplicated varicella. The risk of invasive Group A streptococcal infection was associated with demographic and environmental factors and persistent high fever. There was no association with the use of ibuprofen or paracetamol alone, but the use of both agents was significantly associated with streptococcal infection. These studies demonstrate that children with fever tolerate treatment with ibuprofen as well as treatment with paracetamol. Neither agent is associated with an increased risk of necrotising soft tissue infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical practice. Supplement\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical practice. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical practice. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了两项对发热儿童布洛芬与扑热息痛安全性进行比较的研究。波士顿大学发热研究旨在评估发热儿童发生罕见但严重不良事件的风险。在这项研究中,84192名儿童中有795人入院。两种药物在入院风险或次要终点风险(因哮喘或蜂窝织炎入院,或因腹痛或消化不良就诊)方面没有显著差异,也没有临床显著肾功能损害的证据。然而,布洛芬与哮喘就诊风险显著降低相关:布洛芬的相关发生率为3.0% (CI95% 2.1, 4.1),而扑热息痛的相关发生率为5.1% (CI95% 3.5, 7.1) (P = 0.02)。第二项研究是一项病例对照研究,旨在调查退烧药、水痘感染和坏死性筋膜炎之间可能存在的联系。我们确定了52例19岁以下因水痘和A群链球菌感染而入院的儿童和172例无并发症水痘的匹配对照。侵袭性A群链球菌感染的风险与人口统计学、环境因素和持续高热有关。与单独使用布洛芬或扑热息痛没有关联,但两种药物的使用与链球菌感染显著相关。这些研究表明,发烧儿童可以耐受布洛芬和扑热息痛的治疗。两种药物都不会增加软组织感染坏死性的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The safety of ibuprofen suspension in children.

This paper describes two studies in children with fever in which the safety of ibuprofen was compared with that of paracetamol. The Boston University Fever Study aimed to assess the risk of rare but serious adverse events in febrile children. There were 795 admissions among 84,192 children during the study. There were no significant differences between the drugs in the risk of admission or the risk of secondary endpoints (admissions for asthma or cellulitis, or physician visits for abdominal pain or dyspepsia) and no evidence of clinically significant impairment of renal function. However, ibuprofen was associated with a significantly lower risk of physician visits for asthma: the incidence associated with ibuprofen was 3.0% (CI95% 2.1, 4.1) compared with 5.1% (CI95% 3.5, 7.1) for paracetamol (P = 0.02). The second study was a case control study to investigate a possible association between antipyretic medication, varicella infection and necrotising fasciitis. We identified 52 children aged under 19 years who were admitted to hospital with varicella and Group A streptococcal infection and 172 matched controls with uncomplicated varicella. The risk of invasive Group A streptococcal infection was associated with demographic and environmental factors and persistent high fever. There was no association with the use of ibuprofen or paracetamol alone, but the use of both agents was significantly associated with streptococcal infection. These studies demonstrate that children with fever tolerate treatment with ibuprofen as well as treatment with paracetamol. Neither agent is associated with an increased risk of necrotising soft tissue infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving glucose management: ten steps to get more patients with type 2 diabetes to glycaemic goal. Recommendations from the Global Partnership for Effective Diabetes Management. Antidiuretic therapy for bladder disorders. Basis and therapeutical rationale of the urinary concentrating mechanism. Primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis in children and adolescents. Nocturia in men.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1