{"title":"成人身体残疾患者的初级保健满意度:医患沟通的作用。","authors":"Thilo Kroll, Phillip W Beatty, Shawn Bingham","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine overall satisfaction with primary care among people with cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, and spinal cord injury, and to identify potential differences in primary care satisfaction between managed care (MC) and fee-for-service (FFS) enrollees with these physical disabilities.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The sample consisted of 195 people with cerebral palsy (CP), multiple sclerosis (MS), and spinal cord injury (SCI), between the ages of 18 and 65 who had received primary care services in the six months prior to the survey.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Satisfaction with various aspects of primary care were assessed using a 10-item self-report measure. Respondents were compared with regard to service satisfaction based on disability and insurance type (MC vs. FFS). Satisfaction items were summed up to produce an unweighted index of overall satisfaction. In the analysis we used non-parametric statistics, such as Kruskal-Wallis One Way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney Rank tests. Post hoc alpha corrections were performed using the Holms Stepdown Procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The lack of disability-specific knowledge among primary care providers is consistent with findings of other studies. People with physical disabilities in managed care plans are less satisfied with how their providers communicate with them, relative to those in FFS plans. Poor patient-provider communication may place individuals with certain physical disabilities at risk for not receiving appropriate care.</p>","PeriodicalId":79681,"journal":{"name":"Managed care quarterly","volume":"11 1","pages":"11-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary care satisfaction among adults with physical disabilities: the role of patient-provider communication.\",\"authors\":\"Thilo Kroll, Phillip W Beatty, Shawn Bingham\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine overall satisfaction with primary care among people with cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, and spinal cord injury, and to identify potential differences in primary care satisfaction between managed care (MC) and fee-for-service (FFS) enrollees with these physical disabilities.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The sample consisted of 195 people with cerebral palsy (CP), multiple sclerosis (MS), and spinal cord injury (SCI), between the ages of 18 and 65 who had received primary care services in the six months prior to the survey.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Satisfaction with various aspects of primary care were assessed using a 10-item self-report measure. Respondents were compared with regard to service satisfaction based on disability and insurance type (MC vs. FFS). Satisfaction items were summed up to produce an unweighted index of overall satisfaction. In the analysis we used non-parametric statistics, such as Kruskal-Wallis One Way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney Rank tests. Post hoc alpha corrections were performed using the Holms Stepdown Procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The lack of disability-specific knowledge among primary care providers is consistent with findings of other studies. People with physical disabilities in managed care plans are less satisfied with how their providers communicate with them, relative to those in FFS plans. Poor patient-provider communication may place individuals with certain physical disabilities at risk for not receiving appropriate care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Managed care quarterly\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"11-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Managed care quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managed care quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:确定脑瘫、多发性硬化症和脊髓损伤患者对初级保健的总体满意度,并确定有这些身体残疾的管理式医疗(MC)和按服务收费(FFS)参保者对初级保健满意度的潜在差异。参与者:样本包括195名脑瘫(CP)、多发性硬化症(MS)和脊髓损伤(SCI)患者,年龄在18至65岁之间,在调查前6个月内接受过初级保健服务。测量:对初级保健各方面的满意度采用10项自我报告测量进行评估。受访者根据残疾和保险类型(MC vs. FFS)对服务满意度进行了比较。满意度项目被总结以产生总体满意度的未加权指数。在分析中,我们使用非参数统计,如Kruskal-Wallis单向方差分析和Mann-Whitney秩检验。采用Holms降压程序进行事后alpha校正。结论:初级保健提供者缺乏残疾特异性知识与其他研究结果一致。与FFS计划相比,管理式医疗计划中的身体残疾者对服务提供者与他们沟通的方式不太满意。不良的医患沟通可能会使某些身体残疾的个体面临得不到适当护理的风险。
Primary care satisfaction among adults with physical disabilities: the role of patient-provider communication.
Objectives: To determine overall satisfaction with primary care among people with cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, and spinal cord injury, and to identify potential differences in primary care satisfaction between managed care (MC) and fee-for-service (FFS) enrollees with these physical disabilities.
Participants: The sample consisted of 195 people with cerebral palsy (CP), multiple sclerosis (MS), and spinal cord injury (SCI), between the ages of 18 and 65 who had received primary care services in the six months prior to the survey.
Measurements: Satisfaction with various aspects of primary care were assessed using a 10-item self-report measure. Respondents were compared with regard to service satisfaction based on disability and insurance type (MC vs. FFS). Satisfaction items were summed up to produce an unweighted index of overall satisfaction. In the analysis we used non-parametric statistics, such as Kruskal-Wallis One Way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney Rank tests. Post hoc alpha corrections were performed using the Holms Stepdown Procedure.
Conclusions: The lack of disability-specific knowledge among primary care providers is consistent with findings of other studies. People with physical disabilities in managed care plans are less satisfied with how their providers communicate with them, relative to those in FFS plans. Poor patient-provider communication may place individuals with certain physical disabilities at risk for not receiving appropriate care.