医疗保险受益人的突出选择。

Managed care quarterly Pub Date : 2003-01-01
Marsha Gold, Lori Achman, Randall Brown
{"title":"医疗保险受益人的突出选择。","authors":"Marsha Gold,&nbsp;Lori Achman,&nbsp;Randall Brown","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The MedicareChoice program was created to expand choice and encourage beneficiaries to more actively consider the choices they have. This article assesses how \"salient\" choice is to Medicare beneficiaries. More than half of all Medicare beneficiaries in 2000 reported that they either have never considered their options to join a Medicare HMO or get supplemental coverage (44 percent) or did so last when they first became Medicare eligible (14 percent). Overall, 14 percent of Medicare beneficiaries found choice salient in 2000. Those new to Medicare or forced to switch because their plan left the program were more likely to consider choice, as expected. The multi-variate analysis shows that existing HMO enrollment is most strongly associated with salience of choice and also that this effect operates especially in the individual market. The findings of this research are consistent with the literature in highlighting the limited salience of choice to Medicare beneficiaries and the even more limited extent of actual switching that occurs in that market. There is little reason to believe that choice is more salient now than when the study was done. Policymakers who seek to encourage market-based solutions confront a dilemma: How to create incentives for a choice that most beneficiaries do not find particularly salient.</p>","PeriodicalId":79681,"journal":{"name":"Managed care quarterly","volume":"11 1","pages":"24-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The salience of choice for Medicare beneficiaries.\",\"authors\":\"Marsha Gold,&nbsp;Lori Achman,&nbsp;Randall Brown\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The MedicareChoice program was created to expand choice and encourage beneficiaries to more actively consider the choices they have. This article assesses how \\\"salient\\\" choice is to Medicare beneficiaries. More than half of all Medicare beneficiaries in 2000 reported that they either have never considered their options to join a Medicare HMO or get supplemental coverage (44 percent) or did so last when they first became Medicare eligible (14 percent). Overall, 14 percent of Medicare beneficiaries found choice salient in 2000. Those new to Medicare or forced to switch because their plan left the program were more likely to consider choice, as expected. The multi-variate analysis shows that existing HMO enrollment is most strongly associated with salience of choice and also that this effect operates especially in the individual market. The findings of this research are consistent with the literature in highlighting the limited salience of choice to Medicare beneficiaries and the even more limited extent of actual switching that occurs in that market. There is little reason to believe that choice is more salient now than when the study was done. Policymakers who seek to encourage market-based solutions confront a dilemma: How to create incentives for a choice that most beneficiaries do not find particularly salient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Managed care quarterly\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"24-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Managed care quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managed care quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗选择计划的建立是为了扩大选择范围,鼓励受益人更积极地考虑他们所拥有的选择。这篇文章评估了如何“突出”的选择是医疗保险受益人。2000年,超过一半的医疗保险受益人报告说,他们要么从未考虑过加入医疗保险HMO或获得补充保险的选择(44%),要么在他们第一次获得医疗保险资格时才这么做(14%)。总体而言,14%的医疗保险受益人在2000年发现选择突出。那些新加入联邦医疗保险的人,或者因为他们的计划离开了该计划而被迫改变的人,更有可能考虑选择,正如预期的那样。多变量分析表明,现有的HMO登记与选择的显著性最密切相关,而且这种效应在个人市场中尤为明显。本研究的结果与文献一致,强调了医疗保险受益人的选择有限,而在该市场中发生的实际转换程度则更为有限。没有理由相信现在的选择比研究完成时更加突出。寻求鼓励以市场为基础的解决方案的政策制定者面临着一个困境:如何为大多数受益者并不特别突出的选择创造激励。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The salience of choice for Medicare beneficiaries.

The MedicareChoice program was created to expand choice and encourage beneficiaries to more actively consider the choices they have. This article assesses how "salient" choice is to Medicare beneficiaries. More than half of all Medicare beneficiaries in 2000 reported that they either have never considered their options to join a Medicare HMO or get supplemental coverage (44 percent) or did so last when they first became Medicare eligible (14 percent). Overall, 14 percent of Medicare beneficiaries found choice salient in 2000. Those new to Medicare or forced to switch because their plan left the program were more likely to consider choice, as expected. The multi-variate analysis shows that existing HMO enrollment is most strongly associated with salience of choice and also that this effect operates especially in the individual market. The findings of this research are consistent with the literature in highlighting the limited salience of choice to Medicare beneficiaries and the even more limited extent of actual switching that occurs in that market. There is little reason to believe that choice is more salient now than when the study was done. Policymakers who seek to encourage market-based solutions confront a dilemma: How to create incentives for a choice that most beneficiaries do not find particularly salient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
State regulation of medical discount programs: a new frontier. A new "loyalty rewards" program in health care customer relationships. MCOs following innovative CMS remote monitoring initiative: self-testing service is designed to lower costs and improve outcomes for anticoagulation therapy. Oath-based behavior change in "out-of-control" type 2 diabetics? Ten-city disease management project intended to increase wellness efforts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1