非甾体抗炎药与癌症的流行病学。

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Progress in Tumor Research Pub Date : 2003-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000071364
John A Baron
{"title":"非甾体抗炎药与癌症的流行病学。","authors":"John A Baron","doi":"10.1159/000071364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is evidence that aspirin--and apparently other NSAIDs--may be protective agents against cancer in the gastrointestinal tract. These effects are particularly well documented in the colon and rectum. Even considered in isolation, the observational data regarding colorectal neoplasia are quite strong, and the reality of a protective effect is buttressed by clinical trial data showing that aspirin prevents sporadic adenomas. Furthermore, the NSAIDs sulindac celecoxib have actually led to the regression of existing colorectal polyps in patients with FAP. Clearly, NSAIDs have the potential to suppress carcinogenesis in the large bowel. Observational data suggesting inverse associations of NSAIDs with cancers of the stomach and esophagus have emerged from several case-control studies and a few cohort analyses. In some studies the findings display features often associated with causal relationships, for example decreasing risks with increasing doses or duration of use. Nonetheless, the data currently do not support a secure conclusion that NSAIDs protect against these malignancies. The relevant data are not nearly as extensive as those for the colorectum, and case-control investigation of these upper gastrointestinal sites may be particularly delicate. It is conceivable that early symptoms of cancer (or of pre-invasive lesions) may have discouraged NSAID use in the cancer patients, creating the appearance of a protective association of the drugs with the risk of these malignancies. More extensive observational data particularly from cohort studies would be desirable to confirm the existing findings and clarify the doses and durations of use required for an effect. Clinical trial investigation might also be practical for pre-neoplastic endpoints, or--in carefully selected populations--perhaps with cancer as the focus. There are only relatively limited data available regarding the effect of NSAIDs on cancer of the pancreas. However, the studies that have investigated this malignancy have reported indications that NSAIDs may have a protective effect. The effects of NSAIDs on cancers outside the gastrointestinal tract are not clear. Some investigations suggest that NSAID use, particularly aspirin, is inversely associated with risk of cancers of the breast or ovary, but several well-done studies have not seen these associations, and the observations could have been due to bias or confounding. Findings regarding prostate cancer are similarly conflicting. The urinary tract is one organ system in which several studies have reported an increased cancer risk in association with NSAID use. Nonetheless, the effects remain unclear. There is only limited available information regarding carcinoma of the bladder, and no firm conclusions can be drawn at this point. More extensive data have been generated regarding the effect of NSAIDs--largely salicylates--on renal cell carcinoma or cancer or the renal pelvis and ureter. Although some studies have reported increased risks, there are also findings suggesting no association. It is particularly difficult for observational studies to ascertain with confidence the true effects of aspirin because of the suspected relationship of these cancers with use of phenacetin and perhaps acetaminophen. Further data--particularly from careful and large cohort studies--would be important to clarify these issues. As a body of research, the findings discussed here from epidemiological studies and clinical trials have begun to clarify the effect of NSAIDs on carcinogenesis in various organs in humans. There is clear potential for protective effects at several anatomic sites. Even for the colorectum, however, it is probably premature to now begin to use these drugs widely for cancer prevention. To reach that point, a weighing of the risks and benefits of the drugs needs to be made, together with a judgement regarding the benefits of alternative means of prevention. For colorectal cancer, for example, aspirin may provide only limited benefit over regular colonoscopy [95, 96]. Nonetheless, with the increased understanding of the clinical effects of NSAIDs on cancer, the development of effective chemoprevention with these drugs appears to be a real possibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":49661,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Tumor Research","volume":"37 ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000071364","citationCount":"168","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epidemiology of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cancer.\",\"authors\":\"John A Baron\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000071364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is evidence that aspirin--and apparently other NSAIDs--may be protective agents against cancer in the gastrointestinal tract. These effects are particularly well documented in the colon and rectum. Even considered in isolation, the observational data regarding colorectal neoplasia are quite strong, and the reality of a protective effect is buttressed by clinical trial data showing that aspirin prevents sporadic adenomas. Furthermore, the NSAIDs sulindac celecoxib have actually led to the regression of existing colorectal polyps in patients with FAP. Clearly, NSAIDs have the potential to suppress carcinogenesis in the large bowel. Observational data suggesting inverse associations of NSAIDs with cancers of the stomach and esophagus have emerged from several case-control studies and a few cohort analyses. In some studies the findings display features often associated with causal relationships, for example decreasing risks with increasing doses or duration of use. Nonetheless, the data currently do not support a secure conclusion that NSAIDs protect against these malignancies. The relevant data are not nearly as extensive as those for the colorectum, and case-control investigation of these upper gastrointestinal sites may be particularly delicate. It is conceivable that early symptoms of cancer (or of pre-invasive lesions) may have discouraged NSAID use in the cancer patients, creating the appearance of a protective association of the drugs with the risk of these malignancies. More extensive observational data particularly from cohort studies would be desirable to confirm the existing findings and clarify the doses and durations of use required for an effect. Clinical trial investigation might also be practical for pre-neoplastic endpoints, or--in carefully selected populations--perhaps with cancer as the focus. There are only relatively limited data available regarding the effect of NSAIDs on cancer of the pancreas. However, the studies that have investigated this malignancy have reported indications that NSAIDs may have a protective effect. The effects of NSAIDs on cancers outside the gastrointestinal tract are not clear. Some investigations suggest that NSAID use, particularly aspirin, is inversely associated with risk of cancers of the breast or ovary, but several well-done studies have not seen these associations, and the observations could have been due to bias or confounding. Findings regarding prostate cancer are similarly conflicting. The urinary tract is one organ system in which several studies have reported an increased cancer risk in association with NSAID use. Nonetheless, the effects remain unclear. There is only limited available information regarding carcinoma of the bladder, and no firm conclusions can be drawn at this point. More extensive data have been generated regarding the effect of NSAIDs--largely salicylates--on renal cell carcinoma or cancer or the renal pelvis and ureter. Although some studies have reported increased risks, there are also findings suggesting no association. It is particularly difficult for observational studies to ascertain with confidence the true effects of aspirin because of the suspected relationship of these cancers with use of phenacetin and perhaps acetaminophen. Further data--particularly from careful and large cohort studies--would be important to clarify these issues. As a body of research, the findings discussed here from epidemiological studies and clinical trials have begun to clarify the effect of NSAIDs on carcinogenesis in various organs in humans. There is clear potential for protective effects at several anatomic sites. Even for the colorectum, however, it is probably premature to now begin to use these drugs widely for cancer prevention. To reach that point, a weighing of the risks and benefits of the drugs needs to be made, together with a judgement regarding the benefits of alternative means of prevention. For colorectal cancer, for example, aspirin may provide only limited benefit over regular colonoscopy [95, 96]. Nonetheless, with the increased understanding of the clinical effects of NSAIDs on cancer, the development of effective chemoprevention with these drugs appears to be a real possibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Tumor Research\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"1-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000071364\",\"citationCount\":\"168\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Tumor Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000071364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Tumor Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000071364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 168

摘要

有证据表明,阿司匹林和其他非甾体抗炎药可能是预防胃肠道癌症的保护剂。这些影响在结肠和直肠中尤为明显。即使单独考虑,关于结直肠肿瘤的观察数据也相当强大,临床试验数据表明阿司匹林可以预防散发性腺瘤,这一保护作用的现实得到了支持。此外,非甾体抗炎药舒林他塞来昔布实际上导致FAP患者现有结肠直肠息肉的消退。显然,非甾体抗炎药有抑制大肠癌变的潜力。一些病例对照研究和一些队列分析显示,非甾体抗炎药与胃癌和食道癌呈负相关。在一些研究中,研究结果显示出往往与因果关系有关的特征,例如,风险随着剂量或使用时间的增加而降低。尽管如此,目前的数据并不支持非甾体抗炎药可以预防这些恶性肿瘤的可靠结论。相关数据不像结直肠的数据那么广泛,对这些上消化道部位的病例对照调查可能特别微妙。可以想象,癌症的早期症状(或侵袭前病变)可能阻碍了非甾体抗炎药在癌症患者中的应用,造成了药物与这些恶性肿瘤风险之间的保护性联系。需要更广泛的观察性数据,特别是来自队列研究的数据,以证实现有的发现,并澄清产生效果所需的剂量和使用时间。临床试验调查可能也适用于肿瘤前终点,或者——在精心挑选的人群中——可能以癌症为重点。关于非甾体抗炎药对胰腺癌的影响,只有相对有限的数据。然而,调查这种恶性肿瘤的研究报告表明,非甾体抗炎药可能具有保护作用。非甾体抗炎药对胃肠道外癌症的影响尚不清楚。一些调查表明,非甾体抗炎药的使用,特别是阿司匹林,与乳腺癌或卵巢癌的风险呈负相关,但一些做得很好的研究并未发现这些关联,这些观察结果可能是由于偏倚或混淆。关于前列腺癌的研究结果同样相互矛盾。泌尿道是其中一个器官系统,有几项研究报道了与使用非甾体抗炎药相关的癌症风险增加。尽管如此,其影响仍不清楚。关于膀胱癌的可用信息有限,目前还不能得出确切的结论。关于非甾体抗炎药(主要是水杨酸盐)对肾细胞癌或肾盂和输尿管的影响,已经产生了更广泛的数据。尽管一些研究报告了风险增加,但也有研究结果表明没有关联。由于怀疑这些癌症与非那西丁和对乙酰氨基酚的使用有关,观察性研究尤其难以确定阿司匹林的真正效果。进一步的数据——特别是来自仔细和大型队列研究的数据——将对澄清这些问题很重要。作为一个整体的研究,本文讨论的流行病学研究和临床试验的结果已经开始阐明非甾体抗炎药对人体各器官癌变的影响。在几个解剖部位有明显的潜在保护作用。然而,即使对于结肠直肠,现在开始广泛使用这些药物来预防癌症可能还为时过早。为了达到这一点,需要权衡药物的风险和益处,并对其他预防手段的益处作出判断。例如,对于结直肠癌,阿司匹林可能仅比常规结肠镜检查提供有限的益处[95,96]。尽管如此,随着对非甾体抗炎药对癌症的临床作用的了解的增加,用这些药物开发有效的化学预防似乎是一个真正的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Epidemiology of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cancer.

There is evidence that aspirin--and apparently other NSAIDs--may be protective agents against cancer in the gastrointestinal tract. These effects are particularly well documented in the colon and rectum. Even considered in isolation, the observational data regarding colorectal neoplasia are quite strong, and the reality of a protective effect is buttressed by clinical trial data showing that aspirin prevents sporadic adenomas. Furthermore, the NSAIDs sulindac celecoxib have actually led to the regression of existing colorectal polyps in patients with FAP. Clearly, NSAIDs have the potential to suppress carcinogenesis in the large bowel. Observational data suggesting inverse associations of NSAIDs with cancers of the stomach and esophagus have emerged from several case-control studies and a few cohort analyses. In some studies the findings display features often associated with causal relationships, for example decreasing risks with increasing doses or duration of use. Nonetheless, the data currently do not support a secure conclusion that NSAIDs protect against these malignancies. The relevant data are not nearly as extensive as those for the colorectum, and case-control investigation of these upper gastrointestinal sites may be particularly delicate. It is conceivable that early symptoms of cancer (or of pre-invasive lesions) may have discouraged NSAID use in the cancer patients, creating the appearance of a protective association of the drugs with the risk of these malignancies. More extensive observational data particularly from cohort studies would be desirable to confirm the existing findings and clarify the doses and durations of use required for an effect. Clinical trial investigation might also be practical for pre-neoplastic endpoints, or--in carefully selected populations--perhaps with cancer as the focus. There are only relatively limited data available regarding the effect of NSAIDs on cancer of the pancreas. However, the studies that have investigated this malignancy have reported indications that NSAIDs may have a protective effect. The effects of NSAIDs on cancers outside the gastrointestinal tract are not clear. Some investigations suggest that NSAID use, particularly aspirin, is inversely associated with risk of cancers of the breast or ovary, but several well-done studies have not seen these associations, and the observations could have been due to bias or confounding. Findings regarding prostate cancer are similarly conflicting. The urinary tract is one organ system in which several studies have reported an increased cancer risk in association with NSAID use. Nonetheless, the effects remain unclear. There is only limited available information regarding carcinoma of the bladder, and no firm conclusions can be drawn at this point. More extensive data have been generated regarding the effect of NSAIDs--largely salicylates--on renal cell carcinoma or cancer or the renal pelvis and ureter. Although some studies have reported increased risks, there are also findings suggesting no association. It is particularly difficult for observational studies to ascertain with confidence the true effects of aspirin because of the suspected relationship of these cancers with use of phenacetin and perhaps acetaminophen. Further data--particularly from careful and large cohort studies--would be important to clarify these issues. As a body of research, the findings discussed here from epidemiological studies and clinical trials have begun to clarify the effect of NSAIDs on carcinogenesis in various organs in humans. There is clear potential for protective effects at several anatomic sites. Even for the colorectum, however, it is probably premature to now begin to use these drugs widely for cancer prevention. To reach that point, a weighing of the risks and benefits of the drugs needs to be made, together with a judgement regarding the benefits of alternative means of prevention. For colorectal cancer, for example, aspirin may provide only limited benefit over regular colonoscopy [95, 96]. Nonetheless, with the increased understanding of the clinical effects of NSAIDs on cancer, the development of effective chemoprevention with these drugs appears to be a real possibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Tumor Research
Progress in Tumor Research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The scientific book series ''Progress in Tumor Research'' aims to provide in depth information about important developments in cancer research. The individual volumes are authored and edited by experts to provide detailed coverage of topics selected as either representing controversial issues or belonging to areas where the speed of developments necessitates the kind of assistance offered by integrative, critical reviews.
期刊最新文献
Bovine adenoviruses. Imaging for Target Volume Definition and Response Assessment in Lung Cancer. Increasing Access to Clinical Trials and Innovative Therapy for Teenagers and Young Adults with Cancer - A Multiple Stakeholders and Multiple Steps Process. Collaboration and Networking. Adult Cancers in Adolescents and Young Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1