II型锁骨远端骨折非手术治疗与手术治疗的比较。

Andrew S Rokito, Joseph D Zuckerman, Jeffrey M Shaari, David P Eisenberg, Frances Cuomo, Maureen A Gallagher
{"title":"II型锁骨远端骨折非手术治疗与手术治疗的比较。","authors":"Andrew S Rokito,&nbsp;Joseph D Zuckerman,&nbsp;Jeffrey M Shaari,&nbsp;David P Eisenberg,&nbsp;Frances Cuomo,&nbsp;Maureen A Gallagher","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A retrospective study was performed to compare nonoperative and operative treatments of Type II distal clavicle fractures. From a total of 30 diagnosed patients, 16 were identified as receiving nonoperative treatment and 14 open reduction and coracoclavicular stabilization. The average follow-up was 53.5 months for the nonoperative group and 59.8 months for the operative group. All patients were evaluated postoperatively for pain, range of motion, function, and fracture healing as well as for isokinetic strength. Fractures treated surgically achieved union within six to ten weeks. Nonoperative treatment resulted in seven nonunions. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the mean UCLA, Constant, and ASES scores. Nonunion had no significant effect on functional outcome or strength. This study suggests that Type II distal clavicle fractures can be successfully managed nonoperatively. The high incidence of nonunion does not impede a clinical outcome comparable to that achieved by surgical treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":77050,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.))","volume":"61 1-2","pages":"32-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of nonoperative and operative treatment of type II distal clavicle fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew S Rokito,&nbsp;Joseph D Zuckerman,&nbsp;Jeffrey M Shaari,&nbsp;David P Eisenberg,&nbsp;Frances Cuomo,&nbsp;Maureen A Gallagher\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A retrospective study was performed to compare nonoperative and operative treatments of Type II distal clavicle fractures. From a total of 30 diagnosed patients, 16 were identified as receiving nonoperative treatment and 14 open reduction and coracoclavicular stabilization. The average follow-up was 53.5 months for the nonoperative group and 59.8 months for the operative group. All patients were evaluated postoperatively for pain, range of motion, function, and fracture healing as well as for isokinetic strength. Fractures treated surgically achieved union within six to ten weeks. Nonoperative treatment resulted in seven nonunions. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the mean UCLA, Constant, and ASES scores. Nonunion had no significant effect on functional outcome or strength. This study suggests that Type II distal clavicle fractures can be successfully managed nonoperatively. The high incidence of nonunion does not impede a clinical outcome comparable to that achieved by surgical treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.))\",\"volume\":\"61 1-2\",\"pages\":\"32-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.))\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.))","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

回顾性研究比较非手术治疗和手术治疗II型锁骨远端骨折。在30例确诊患者中,16例接受非手术治疗,14例接受切开复位和喙锁骨稳定。非手术组平均随访53.5个月,手术组平均随访59.8个月。所有患者术后均评估疼痛、活动范围、功能、骨折愈合以及等速力量。手术治疗的骨折在6 - 10周内愈合。非手术治疗导致7例骨不连。两组患者的平均UCLA、Constant和ASES评分无显著差异。骨不连对功能结局或强度没有显著影响。本研究表明II型锁骨远端骨折可以通过非手术治疗成功。高发生率的骨不连并不妨碍与手术治疗相比的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of nonoperative and operative treatment of type II distal clavicle fractures.

A retrospective study was performed to compare nonoperative and operative treatments of Type II distal clavicle fractures. From a total of 30 diagnosed patients, 16 were identified as receiving nonoperative treatment and 14 open reduction and coracoclavicular stabilization. The average follow-up was 53.5 months for the nonoperative group and 59.8 months for the operative group. All patients were evaluated postoperatively for pain, range of motion, function, and fracture healing as well as for isokinetic strength. Fractures treated surgically achieved union within six to ten weeks. Nonoperative treatment resulted in seven nonunions. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the mean UCLA, Constant, and ASES scores. Nonunion had no significant effect on functional outcome or strength. This study suggests that Type II distal clavicle fractures can be successfully managed nonoperatively. The high incidence of nonunion does not impede a clinical outcome comparable to that achieved by surgical treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acetabular Fractures in the Elderly The effect of interference screw diameter on soft tissue graft fixation. The interaction between the whipstitch sutures of multi-strand ACL grafts and interference screw fixation. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis in identical twins: is there an HLA predisposition? Report of a case and review of the literature. Loose bodies in a sublabral recess: diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1