Ph Rombaux, S Ledeghen, M Hamoir, B Bertrand, Ph Eloy, E Coche, M Caversaccio
{"title":"计算机辅助手术及鼻内镜入路32例。","authors":"Ph Rombaux, S Ledeghen, M Hamoir, B Bertrand, Ph Eloy, E Coche, M Caversaccio","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Computer aided surgery (CAS) is now routinely introduced in the ENT surgical field especially in endoscopic endonasal surgery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Using a frameless computer aided surgery for endoscopic endonasal approach (SurgiGATE ORL TM), we tried to evaluate the practical use of such a system, to calculate supplementary installation time of the procedure, to determine the number of matching attempt (referencing) before starting optonavigation and to determine its clinical accuracy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Thirty two patients underwent endoscopic endonasal surgery with the help of CAS; 13 revision cases (2 nasal polyposis, 7 paranasal sinus mucoceles, 4 frontal recess stenosis) and 19 primary cases (16 inflammatory diseases, 3 benign tumor removal). Paired points matching was used as referencing before optonavigation. Clinical accuracy of CAS was calculated at two confidence points during optonavigation and measured in multiples of the pixel size on CT Scan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Number of matching attempts before starting optonavigation was; mean 1.8 (1-4). Supplementary installation time of the system was; mean 15 minutes (10-40). Clinical accuracy at two confidence points was always between 0.5 mm and 2 mm. (6 < 0.5 mm, 16 < 1 mm, 10 < 2 mm). There was no major complication during surgery neither no side effect due to the use of the CAS except for one case who presented a slight tongue edema due to a wrong position of the dynamic reference base (maxillary splint) during the procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CAS and optonavigation using the surgiGATE ORL TM is safe and efficient in endoscopic endonasal surgery. The accuracy of the system is sufficient and its use appropriate for primary either revision rhinologic procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":55407,"journal":{"name":"B-Ent","volume":"57 2","pages":"131-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computer assisted surgery and endoscopic endonasal approach in 32 procedures.\",\"authors\":\"Ph Rombaux, S Ledeghen, M Hamoir, B Bertrand, Ph Eloy, E Coche, M Caversaccio\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Computer aided surgery (CAS) is now routinely introduced in the ENT surgical field especially in endoscopic endonasal surgery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Using a frameless computer aided surgery for endoscopic endonasal approach (SurgiGATE ORL TM), we tried to evaluate the practical use of such a system, to calculate supplementary installation time of the procedure, to determine the number of matching attempt (referencing) before starting optonavigation and to determine its clinical accuracy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Thirty two patients underwent endoscopic endonasal surgery with the help of CAS; 13 revision cases (2 nasal polyposis, 7 paranasal sinus mucoceles, 4 frontal recess stenosis) and 19 primary cases (16 inflammatory diseases, 3 benign tumor removal). Paired points matching was used as referencing before optonavigation. Clinical accuracy of CAS was calculated at two confidence points during optonavigation and measured in multiples of the pixel size on CT Scan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Number of matching attempts before starting optonavigation was; mean 1.8 (1-4). Supplementary installation time of the system was; mean 15 minutes (10-40). Clinical accuracy at two confidence points was always between 0.5 mm and 2 mm. (6 < 0.5 mm, 16 < 1 mm, 10 < 2 mm). There was no major complication during surgery neither no side effect due to the use of the CAS except for one case who presented a slight tongue edema due to a wrong position of the dynamic reference base (maxillary splint) during the procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CAS and optonavigation using the surgiGATE ORL TM is safe and efficient in endoscopic endonasal surgery. The accuracy of the system is sufficient and its use appropriate for primary either revision rhinologic procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"B-Ent\",\"volume\":\"57 2\",\"pages\":\"131-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"B-Ent\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"B-Ent","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Computer assisted surgery and endoscopic endonasal approach in 32 procedures.
Unlabelled: Computer aided surgery (CAS) is now routinely introduced in the ENT surgical field especially in endoscopic endonasal surgery.
Objective: Using a frameless computer aided surgery for endoscopic endonasal approach (SurgiGATE ORL TM), we tried to evaluate the practical use of such a system, to calculate supplementary installation time of the procedure, to determine the number of matching attempt (referencing) before starting optonavigation and to determine its clinical accuracy.
Patients and methods: Thirty two patients underwent endoscopic endonasal surgery with the help of CAS; 13 revision cases (2 nasal polyposis, 7 paranasal sinus mucoceles, 4 frontal recess stenosis) and 19 primary cases (16 inflammatory diseases, 3 benign tumor removal). Paired points matching was used as referencing before optonavigation. Clinical accuracy of CAS was calculated at two confidence points during optonavigation and measured in multiples of the pixel size on CT Scan.
Results: Number of matching attempts before starting optonavigation was; mean 1.8 (1-4). Supplementary installation time of the system was; mean 15 minutes (10-40). Clinical accuracy at two confidence points was always between 0.5 mm and 2 mm. (6 < 0.5 mm, 16 < 1 mm, 10 < 2 mm). There was no major complication during surgery neither no side effect due to the use of the CAS except for one case who presented a slight tongue edema due to a wrong position of the dynamic reference base (maxillary splint) during the procedure.
Conclusions: CAS and optonavigation using the surgiGATE ORL TM is safe and efficient in endoscopic endonasal surgery. The accuracy of the system is sufficient and its use appropriate for primary either revision rhinologic procedures.
期刊介绍:
Throughout its history, the Royal Belgian Society of Oto-rhino-laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, the home society of B-ENT, aims to disseminate both the scientific and the clinical knowledge of otorhinolaryngology field primarily in Belgium and its regions. In accordance with this aim, publishing a scientific journal has become the number one objective of the Society. Accordingly, B-ENT contributes to the scientific memory of Belgium considering its deep-rooted history.