母亲对胎儿:谁赢?

RN, RM, BAppSc, MSc, LLB, FRCNA Helen Newnham
{"title":"母亲对胎儿:谁赢?","authors":"RN, RM, BAppSc, MSc, LLB, FRCNA Helen Newnham","doi":"10.1016/S1031-170X(03)80012-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article examines the right of pregnant women to determine what will happen to their own bodies and whether their right to autonomy is absolute when refusing treatment which may be consider in their best interests and/or their fetuses'.</p><p>A theoretical framework is used supported by relevant legal cases to argue that in some instance the rights of women to refuse treatment, most notably caesarean section have been overridden in favour of the fetus. The conclusion from the legal cases is that despite the consequences a woman's rights should not be overridden in favour of the fetus.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100149,"journal":{"name":"Australian Midwifery","volume":"16 1","pages":"Pages 23-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1031-170X(03)80012-0","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mother v fetus: who wins?\",\"authors\":\"RN, RM, BAppSc, MSc, LLB, FRCNA Helen Newnham\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1031-170X(03)80012-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article examines the right of pregnant women to determine what will happen to their own bodies and whether their right to autonomy is absolute when refusing treatment which may be consider in their best interests and/or their fetuses'.</p><p>A theoretical framework is used supported by relevant legal cases to argue that in some instance the rights of women to refuse treatment, most notably caesarean section have been overridden in favour of the fetus. The conclusion from the legal cases is that despite the consequences a woman's rights should not be overridden in favour of the fetus.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Midwifery\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 23-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1031-170X(03)80012-0\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1031170X03800120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1031170X03800120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

这篇文章探讨了孕妇决定自己身体会发生什么的权利,以及她们在拒绝可能被认为符合她们和/或胎儿最大利益的治疗时是否有绝对的自主权。在相关法律案例的支持下,一个理论框架被用来论证,在某些情况下,妇女拒绝治疗的权利,最明显的是剖腹产,为了胎儿的利益而被推翻。从这些法律案件中得出的结论是,不管后果如何,妇女的权利不应该为了胎儿的利益而被推翻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mother v fetus: who wins?

This article examines the right of pregnant women to determine what will happen to their own bodies and whether their right to autonomy is absolute when refusing treatment which may be consider in their best interests and/or their fetuses'.

A theoretical framework is used supported by relevant legal cases to argue that in some instance the rights of women to refuse treatment, most notably caesarean section have been overridden in favour of the fetus. The conclusion from the legal cases is that despite the consequences a woman's rights should not be overridden in favour of the fetus.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Higher degree abstracts ‘Multidisciplinary collaboration’ and ‘team work’: misnomers for subjugation? The emotional impact on mothers and midwives of conflict between workplace and personal/professional ethics Australian college of midwifery journal to be reborn The experiences of a first cohort of Bachelor of Midwifery students, Victoria, Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1