一项针对抗逆转录病毒治疗失败的hiv感染患者的新治疗策略的开放标签随机临床试验:OPTIMA试验的基本原理和设计

Tassos C Kyriakides Ph.D. , Abdel Babiker Ph.D. , Joel Singer Ph.D. , William Cameron M.D. , Martin T Schechter M.D. , Mark Holodniy M.D. , Sheldon T Brown M.D. , Mike Youle M.D. , Brian Gazzard M.D. , on behalf of the OPTIMA Study Team (see Appendix)
{"title":"一项针对抗逆转录病毒治疗失败的hiv感染患者的新治疗策略的开放标签随机临床试验:OPTIMA试验的基本原理和设计","authors":"Tassos C Kyriakides Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Abdel Babiker Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Joel Singer Ph.D. ,&nbsp;William Cameron M.D. ,&nbsp;Martin T Schechter M.D. ,&nbsp;Mark Holodniy M.D. ,&nbsp;Sheldon T Brown M.D. ,&nbsp;Mike Youle M.D. ,&nbsp;Brian Gazzard M.D. ,&nbsp;on behalf of the OPTIMA Study Team (see Appendix)","doi":"10.1016/S0197-2456(03)00029-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>OPTIMA</strong> (<strong>OPT</strong>ions <strong>I</strong>n <strong>M</strong>anagement with <strong>A</strong>ntiretrovirals) is a clinical trial with a factorial randomization to evaluate the hypotheses that <em>mega-antiretroviral therapy (ART) consisting of five or more anti-HIV drugs</em> compared to <em>standard-ART consisting of four or fewer anti-HIV drugs</em> and a 3-month <em>antiretroviral drug-free period (ARDFP)</em> compared to <em>no ARDFP</em> will delay the occurrence of new or recurrent acquired immunodeficiency syndrome events or death, and prove to be more cost-effective in treating human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals previously exposed to ART drugs from the current three main classes. The aim is to randomize 1700 participants to four treatment strategy arms: (1) <em>ARDFP</em> <!-->+<!--> <em>standard-ART</em>; (2) <em>ARDFP</em> <!-->+<!--> <em>mega-ART</em>; (3) <em>no ARDFP</em> <!-->+<!--> <em>standard-ART</em>; (4) <em>no ARDFP</em> <!-->+<!--> <em>mega-ART</em>. The planned study duration is 3.5 years with 2.5 years of intake and a minimum 1 year of follow-up. The OPTIMA Trial was initiated in June 2001 at 30 U.S. Department of Veterans' Affairs hospitals, 22 hospitals in Canada, and 25 hospitals in the United Kingdom. This is the first large-scale, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to compare the relative efficacy of these different therapeutic strategies. We discuss the rationale behind the OPTIMA Trial design as well as the issues arising from the conduct of a trial that involves three national clinical trial agencies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72706,"journal":{"name":"Controlled clinical trials","volume":"24 4","pages":"Pages 481-500"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0197-2456(03)00029-1","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An open-label randomized clinical trial of novel therapeutic strategies for HIV-infected patients in whom antiretroviral therapy has failed: rationale and design of the OPTIMA Trial\",\"authors\":\"Tassos C Kyriakides Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Abdel Babiker Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Joel Singer Ph.D. ,&nbsp;William Cameron M.D. ,&nbsp;Martin T Schechter M.D. ,&nbsp;Mark Holodniy M.D. ,&nbsp;Sheldon T Brown M.D. ,&nbsp;Mike Youle M.D. ,&nbsp;Brian Gazzard M.D. ,&nbsp;on behalf of the OPTIMA Study Team (see Appendix)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0197-2456(03)00029-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><strong>OPTIMA</strong> (<strong>OPT</strong>ions <strong>I</strong>n <strong>M</strong>anagement with <strong>A</strong>ntiretrovirals) is a clinical trial with a factorial randomization to evaluate the hypotheses that <em>mega-antiretroviral therapy (ART) consisting of five or more anti-HIV drugs</em> compared to <em>standard-ART consisting of four or fewer anti-HIV drugs</em> and a 3-month <em>antiretroviral drug-free period (ARDFP)</em> compared to <em>no ARDFP</em> will delay the occurrence of new or recurrent acquired immunodeficiency syndrome events or death, and prove to be more cost-effective in treating human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals previously exposed to ART drugs from the current three main classes. The aim is to randomize 1700 participants to four treatment strategy arms: (1) <em>ARDFP</em> <!-->+<!--> <em>standard-ART</em>; (2) <em>ARDFP</em> <!-->+<!--> <em>mega-ART</em>; (3) <em>no ARDFP</em> <!-->+<!--> <em>standard-ART</em>; (4) <em>no ARDFP</em> <!-->+<!--> <em>mega-ART</em>. The planned study duration is 3.5 years with 2.5 years of intake and a minimum 1 year of follow-up. The OPTIMA Trial was initiated in June 2001 at 30 U.S. Department of Veterans' Affairs hospitals, 22 hospitals in Canada, and 25 hospitals in the United Kingdom. This is the first large-scale, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to compare the relative efficacy of these different therapeutic strategies. We discuss the rationale behind the OPTIMA Trial design as well as the issues arising from the conduct of a trial that involves three national clinical trial agencies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Controlled clinical trials\",\"volume\":\"24 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 481-500\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0197-2456(03)00029-1\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Controlled clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197245603000291\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Controlled clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197245603000291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

OPTIMA(使用抗逆转录病毒药物进行管理的选择)是一项临床试验,采用因子随机化方法,评估以下假设:与使用四种或更少的抗艾滋病毒药物的标准抗逆转录病毒治疗相比,使用五种或更多种抗艾滋病毒药物的大剂量抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)与不使用ARDFP相比,使用3个月的无抗逆转录病毒药物治疗(ARDFP)将延迟新的或复发性获得性免疫缺陷综合征事件或死亡的发生。并被证明在治疗先前暴露于目前三大类抗逆转录病毒药物的人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者方面更具成本效益。目的是将1700名参与者随机分配到四个治疗策略组:(1)ARDFP +标准art;(2) ARDFP + mega-ART;(3)无ARDFP +标准art;(4)没有ARDFP + mega-ART。计划的研究时间为3.5年,其中2.5年的入组时间和至少1年的随访时间。OPTIMA试验于2001年6月在美国30家退伍军人事务部医院、加拿大22家医院和英国25家医院启动。这是第一个大规模、多中心、随机对照试验来比较这些不同治疗策略的相对疗效。我们讨论了OPTIMA试验设计背后的基本原理,以及涉及三个国家临床试验机构的试验所产生的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An open-label randomized clinical trial of novel therapeutic strategies for HIV-infected patients in whom antiretroviral therapy has failed: rationale and design of the OPTIMA Trial

OPTIMA (OPTions In Management with Antiretrovirals) is a clinical trial with a factorial randomization to evaluate the hypotheses that mega-antiretroviral therapy (ART) consisting of five or more anti-HIV drugs compared to standard-ART consisting of four or fewer anti-HIV drugs and a 3-month antiretroviral drug-free period (ARDFP) compared to no ARDFP will delay the occurrence of new or recurrent acquired immunodeficiency syndrome events or death, and prove to be more cost-effective in treating human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals previously exposed to ART drugs from the current three main classes. The aim is to randomize 1700 participants to four treatment strategy arms: (1) ARDFP + standard-ART; (2) ARDFP + mega-ART; (3) no ARDFP + standard-ART; (4) no ARDFP + mega-ART. The planned study duration is 3.5 years with 2.5 years of intake and a minimum 1 year of follow-up. The OPTIMA Trial was initiated in June 2001 at 30 U.S. Department of Veterans' Affairs hospitals, 22 hospitals in Canada, and 25 hospitals in the United Kingdom. This is the first large-scale, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to compare the relative efficacy of these different therapeutic strategies. We discuss the rationale behind the OPTIMA Trial design as well as the issues arising from the conduct of a trial that involves three national clinical trial agencies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board On the generation and ownership of alpha in medical studies Measuring treatment impact: a review of patient-reported outcomes and other efficacy endpoints in approved product labels Geographic variability in patient characteristics, treatment and outcome in an international trial of magnesium in acute myocardial infarction Analyzing bronchodilation with emphasis on disease type, age and sex
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1