预防性治疗对牙组织表面粗糙度及两种美观修复材料的影响。

Daniele Salami, Maria Aparecida Alves Luz
{"title":"预防性治疗对牙组织表面粗糙度及两种美观修复材料的影响。","authors":"Daniele Salami,&nbsp;Maria Aparecida Alves Luz","doi":"10.1590/s1517-74912003000100012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dental prophylaxis is a common way to remove dental plaque and stain, both undesirable factors in most dentistry procedures. However, besides cleaning the tooth surface, prophylactic techniques may increase the surface roughness of restorations and dental tissues, which, in turn, may result in plaque accumulation, superficial staining and superficial degradation. This study evaluated the effect of three prophylactic techniques--sodium bicarbonate jet, pumice paste and whiting paste--on the superficial roughness of two restorative materials--a composite resin and a compomer--and on the superficial roughness of two dental surfaces--enamel and cementum/dentin--through rugosimetric and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. Statistical analysis of the rugosimetric data showed that the use of pumice paste on enamel produced a significantly smoother surface than the natural surface. However, comparing the effect of the three techniques, prophylaxis with the pumice paste produced a rougher surface than did the other techniques as regards enamel and cementum/dentin probably due to its abrasiveness. On composite resin, the pumice paste only produced a rougher surface than did the whiting paste. On compomer, all of the applied treatments produced similar results. Based on rugosimetric and SEM analysis, we could conclude that the prophylactic treatments employed did not improve roughness of the studied surfaces. As to the effects of the techniques, they were different depending on the surfaces on which the prophylactic treatments were applied.</p>","PeriodicalId":35295,"journal":{"name":"Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research","volume":"17 1","pages":"63-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/s1517-74912003000100012","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of prophylactic treatments on the superficial roughness of dental tissues and of two esthetic restorative materials.\",\"authors\":\"Daniele Salami,&nbsp;Maria Aparecida Alves Luz\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s1517-74912003000100012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dental prophylaxis is a common way to remove dental plaque and stain, both undesirable factors in most dentistry procedures. However, besides cleaning the tooth surface, prophylactic techniques may increase the surface roughness of restorations and dental tissues, which, in turn, may result in plaque accumulation, superficial staining and superficial degradation. This study evaluated the effect of three prophylactic techniques--sodium bicarbonate jet, pumice paste and whiting paste--on the superficial roughness of two restorative materials--a composite resin and a compomer--and on the superficial roughness of two dental surfaces--enamel and cementum/dentin--through rugosimetric and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. Statistical analysis of the rugosimetric data showed that the use of pumice paste on enamel produced a significantly smoother surface than the natural surface. However, comparing the effect of the three techniques, prophylaxis with the pumice paste produced a rougher surface than did the other techniques as regards enamel and cementum/dentin probably due to its abrasiveness. On composite resin, the pumice paste only produced a rougher surface than did the whiting paste. On compomer, all of the applied treatments produced similar results. Based on rugosimetric and SEM analysis, we could conclude that the prophylactic treatments employed did not improve roughness of the studied surfaces. As to the effects of the techniques, they were different depending on the surfaces on which the prophylactic treatments were applied.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"63-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/s1517-74912003000100012\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-74912003000100012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2003/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-74912003000100012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2003/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

牙齿预防是去除牙菌斑和牙斑的常用方法,这两种因素在大多数牙科手术中都是不受欢迎的。然而,除了清洁牙齿表面,预防性技术可能会增加修复体和牙齿组织的表面粗糙度,这反过来可能导致菌斑积聚,表面染色和表面降解。本研究通过粗糙度测量和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析,评估了三种预防技术——碳酸氢钠喷射、浮石膏和美白膏——对两种修复材料(复合树脂和复合材料)的表面粗糙度的影响,以及对两种牙齿表面(牙釉质和牙骨质/牙本质)表面粗糙度的影响。对表面粗糙度数据的统计分析表明,在牙釉质上使用浮石膏的牙釉质表面比天然牙釉质表面光滑得多。然而,比较三种方法的效果,用浮石膏预防的牙釉质和牙骨质/牙本质的表面比其他方法更粗糙,这可能是由于浮石膏的磨蚀性。在复合树脂上,浮石膏只产生比漂白膏更粗糙的表面。在堆肥上,所有施用的处理都产生了相似的结果。基于粗糙度和扫描电镜分析,我们可以得出结论,所采用的预防性处理并没有改善所研究表面的粗糙度。至于这些技术的效果,它们因应用预防性处理的表面而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of prophylactic treatments on the superficial roughness of dental tissues and of two esthetic restorative materials.

Dental prophylaxis is a common way to remove dental plaque and stain, both undesirable factors in most dentistry procedures. However, besides cleaning the tooth surface, prophylactic techniques may increase the surface roughness of restorations and dental tissues, which, in turn, may result in plaque accumulation, superficial staining and superficial degradation. This study evaluated the effect of three prophylactic techniques--sodium bicarbonate jet, pumice paste and whiting paste--on the superficial roughness of two restorative materials--a composite resin and a compomer--and on the superficial roughness of two dental surfaces--enamel and cementum/dentin--through rugosimetric and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. Statistical analysis of the rugosimetric data showed that the use of pumice paste on enamel produced a significantly smoother surface than the natural surface. However, comparing the effect of the three techniques, prophylaxis with the pumice paste produced a rougher surface than did the other techniques as regards enamel and cementum/dentin probably due to its abrasiveness. On composite resin, the pumice paste only produced a rougher surface than did the whiting paste. On compomer, all of the applied treatments produced similar results. Based on rugosimetric and SEM analysis, we could conclude that the prophylactic treatments employed did not improve roughness of the studied surfaces. As to the effects of the techniques, they were different depending on the surfaces on which the prophylactic treatments were applied.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Pesquisa Odontológica Brasileira is a new quarterly published journal (January-March, April-June, July-September, October-December), with an annual supplement (Anais da Reunião de Pesquisa Odontológica da SBPqO), by the Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica [Brazilian Society of Odontological Research] and University of São Paulo. It replaces Revista de Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo (ISSN 0103-0663).
期刊最新文献
Metodologias de identificação de marcas de mordidas O assessor: personagem central na publicação científica Prevalence of microorganisms in root canals of human deciduous teeth with necrotic pulp and chronic periapical lesions. Effect of plaque accumulation and salivary factors on enamel demineralization and plaque composition in situ. In vitro evaluation of human dental enamel surface roughness bleached with 35% carbamide peroxide and submitted to abrasive dentifrice brushing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1