大剂量丁丙诺啡及注射方法。一项对303名患者的研究]。

Annales de medecine interne Pub Date : 2003-06-01
Pascal Courty
{"title":"大剂量丁丙诺啡及注射方法。一项对303名患者的研究]。","authors":"Pascal Courty","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In France, by the end of 1999, a study of a naturalistic-type was led by the Louis-Harris Institute on 303 persons taking high dosage (HD) buprenorphine. This study aimed to identify factors likely to be correlated with stopping or continuing HD buprenorphine injections. We carried out a comparative study of four groups of HD buprenorphine users: \"non-injectors\" (n=90), \"ex-injectors\" (n=71), \"monitored injectors\" (n=69) and \"un-monitored injectors\" (n=72), with intra-group representativeness. The data was gathered in the context of anonymous interviews, by objective interviewers, in 20 regions. Most of the interviewees were also users or ex-users of more than one psychoactive substance. The \"un-monitored injector\" group was younger than the \"non-injector\" group and not as well integrated into society. The injection frequency was lower in patients receiving medical care. Research into the reasons for stopping and cutting down on HD buprenorphine injections revealed indicators such as the impossibility of breaking the injection habit, the fact that users seek the immediate sedation effect, and associating with friends who also inject. These factors seem to be greatest during critical periods, such as depression or the absence of well being. We showed that the factors involved in cutting down included: revaluation of the way in which the medicine was taken with the doctor, and becoming aware of the problems resulting from injection through information received from the doctor and/or by experiencing problems firsthand. In all the groups, the benefits associated with taking HD buprenorphine were observed and evaluated, starting with a list of 14 items. Five main benefits were found: cutting down on or stopping heroine, taking better care of oneself, making new plans, being in better physical shape, and finally, sleeping better. The improvement was greatest in the \"non-injector\" and \"ex-injector\" groups. The work that would be necessary to establish effective medical support involves a global approach including an appropriate initial prescription, paying special attention during critical periods, and verification of the mode of use so as to avoid under-dosing, and constant evaluation of the risk of resorting to injections. The fact that there are ex-injectors and that some regular injectors have not resorted to injecting during the last month shows the benefits of medical support.</p>","PeriodicalId":75505,"journal":{"name":"Annales de medecine interne","volume":"154 Spec No 1 ","pages":"S35-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[High dosage buprenorphine and injection practices. A study of 303 patients].\",\"authors\":\"Pascal Courty\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In France, by the end of 1999, a study of a naturalistic-type was led by the Louis-Harris Institute on 303 persons taking high dosage (HD) buprenorphine. This study aimed to identify factors likely to be correlated with stopping or continuing HD buprenorphine injections. We carried out a comparative study of four groups of HD buprenorphine users: \\\"non-injectors\\\" (n=90), \\\"ex-injectors\\\" (n=71), \\\"monitored injectors\\\" (n=69) and \\\"un-monitored injectors\\\" (n=72), with intra-group representativeness. The data was gathered in the context of anonymous interviews, by objective interviewers, in 20 regions. Most of the interviewees were also users or ex-users of more than one psychoactive substance. The \\\"un-monitored injector\\\" group was younger than the \\\"non-injector\\\" group and not as well integrated into society. The injection frequency was lower in patients receiving medical care. Research into the reasons for stopping and cutting down on HD buprenorphine injections revealed indicators such as the impossibility of breaking the injection habit, the fact that users seek the immediate sedation effect, and associating with friends who also inject. These factors seem to be greatest during critical periods, such as depression or the absence of well being. We showed that the factors involved in cutting down included: revaluation of the way in which the medicine was taken with the doctor, and becoming aware of the problems resulting from injection through information received from the doctor and/or by experiencing problems firsthand. In all the groups, the benefits associated with taking HD buprenorphine were observed and evaluated, starting with a list of 14 items. Five main benefits were found: cutting down on or stopping heroine, taking better care of oneself, making new plans, being in better physical shape, and finally, sleeping better. The improvement was greatest in the \\\"non-injector\\\" and \\\"ex-injector\\\" groups. The work that would be necessary to establish effective medical support involves a global approach including an appropriate initial prescription, paying special attention during critical periods, and verification of the mode of use so as to avoid under-dosing, and constant evaluation of the risk of resorting to injections. The fact that there are ex-injectors and that some regular injectors have not resorted to injecting during the last month shows the benefits of medical support.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales de medecine interne\",\"volume\":\"154 Spec No 1 \",\"pages\":\"S35-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales de medecine interne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de medecine interne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在法国,到1999年底,路易斯-哈里斯研究所对303名服用高剂量丁丙诺啡的人进行了一项自然主义类型的研究。本研究旨在确定可能与停止或继续注射HD丁丙诺啡相关的因素。我们对四组HD丁丙诺啡使用者进行了比较研究:“非注射者”(n=90)、“前注射者”(n=71)、“监控注射者”(n=69)和“未监控注射者”(n=72),具有组内代表性。数据是在匿名采访的背景下收集的,由客观的采访者,在20个地区。大多数受访者也是一种以上精神活性物质的使用者或前使用者。“不受监控的注射者”组比“非注射者”组更年轻,而且没有很好地融入社会。接受医疗护理的患者注射频率较低。对停止和减少注射HD丁丙诺啡的原因的研究显示,注射习惯不可能打破,使用者寻求立即镇静效果,以及与也注射的朋友交往等指标。这些因素似乎在关键时期最为严重,比如抑郁或缺乏幸福感。我们发现,减少用药的因素包括:重新评估医生服用药物的方式,以及通过从医生那里得到的信息和/或亲身经历问题而意识到注射引起的问题。在所有组中,观察和评估了与服用HD丁丙诺啡相关的益处,从14项清单开始。发现了五大好处:减少或停止使用海洛因,更好地照顾自己,制定新的计划,保持更好的身体状态,最后是睡得更好。“不注射”组和“不注射”组的改善最大。建立有效医疗支助所需的工作涉及一种全球办法,包括适当的初始处方、在关键时期特别注意、核查使用方式以避免剂量不足,以及不断评估诉诸注射的风险。有曾经注射过的人,而且一些经常注射的人在上个月没有再次注射,这一事实显示了医疗支助的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[High dosage buprenorphine and injection practices. A study of 303 patients].

In France, by the end of 1999, a study of a naturalistic-type was led by the Louis-Harris Institute on 303 persons taking high dosage (HD) buprenorphine. This study aimed to identify factors likely to be correlated with stopping or continuing HD buprenorphine injections. We carried out a comparative study of four groups of HD buprenorphine users: "non-injectors" (n=90), "ex-injectors" (n=71), "monitored injectors" (n=69) and "un-monitored injectors" (n=72), with intra-group representativeness. The data was gathered in the context of anonymous interviews, by objective interviewers, in 20 regions. Most of the interviewees were also users or ex-users of more than one psychoactive substance. The "un-monitored injector" group was younger than the "non-injector" group and not as well integrated into society. The injection frequency was lower in patients receiving medical care. Research into the reasons for stopping and cutting down on HD buprenorphine injections revealed indicators such as the impossibility of breaking the injection habit, the fact that users seek the immediate sedation effect, and associating with friends who also inject. These factors seem to be greatest during critical periods, such as depression or the absence of well being. We showed that the factors involved in cutting down included: revaluation of the way in which the medicine was taken with the doctor, and becoming aware of the problems resulting from injection through information received from the doctor and/or by experiencing problems firsthand. In all the groups, the benefits associated with taking HD buprenorphine were observed and evaluated, starting with a list of 14 items. Five main benefits were found: cutting down on or stopping heroine, taking better care of oneself, making new plans, being in better physical shape, and finally, sleeping better. The improvement was greatest in the "non-injector" and "ex-injector" groups. The work that would be necessary to establish effective medical support involves a global approach including an appropriate initial prescription, paying special attention during critical periods, and verification of the mode of use so as to avoid under-dosing, and constant evaluation of the risk of resorting to injections. The fact that there are ex-injectors and that some regular injectors have not resorted to injecting during the last month shows the benefits of medical support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Maladie de Still de l'adulte [Necrolytic migratory erythema revealing glucagonoma without diabetes]. Inflammatory pseudotumor of lymph nodes. Kartagener's syndrome and renal failure. [Meteorologic conditions and esophageal varices rupture].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1