{"title":"利益相关者对管理式医疗计划质量的看法。","authors":"Jon M Thompson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quality within managed care plans continues to be a contentious issue. This article reports on a case study undertaken to identify the importance of health plan quality attributes to three key stakeholder groups affiliated with a single plan: employers, physicians, and consumers. Findings from a representative survey of these three stakeholder groups indicate that they value different attributes, and suggest that plans must be responsive to these varying perceptions of quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":79681,"journal":{"name":"Managed care quarterly","volume":"11 2","pages":"12-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stakeholder perceptions of quality in managed care plans.\",\"authors\":\"Jon M Thompson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Quality within managed care plans continues to be a contentious issue. This article reports on a case study undertaken to identify the importance of health plan quality attributes to three key stakeholder groups affiliated with a single plan: employers, physicians, and consumers. Findings from a representative survey of these three stakeholder groups indicate that they value different attributes, and suggest that plans must be responsive to these varying perceptions of quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Managed care quarterly\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"12-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Managed care quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managed care quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Stakeholder perceptions of quality in managed care plans.
Quality within managed care plans continues to be a contentious issue. This article reports on a case study undertaken to identify the importance of health plan quality attributes to three key stakeholder groups affiliated with a single plan: employers, physicians, and consumers. Findings from a representative survey of these three stakeholder groups indicate that they value different attributes, and suggest that plans must be responsive to these varying perceptions of quality.