激光微照射诱导活细胞DNA损伤的蛋白质募集分析:数据分析的最佳实践

IF 3 3区 生物学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY DNA Repair Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.dnarep.2023.103545
Ryan M. Bianchini, Ebba U. Kurz
{"title":"激光微照射诱导活细胞DNA损伤的蛋白质募集分析:数据分析的最佳实践","authors":"Ryan M. Bianchini,&nbsp;Ebba U. Kurz","doi":"10.1016/j.dnarep.2023.103545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Laser microirradiation coupled with live-cell fluorescence microscopy<span> is a powerful technique that has been used widely in studying the recruitment and retention of proteins at sites of DNA damage. Results obtained from this technique can be found in published works by both seasoned and infrequent users of microscopy. However, like many other microscopy-based techniques, the presentation of data from laser microirradiation experiments is inconsistent; papers report a wide assortment of analytic techniques, not all of which result in accurate and/or appropriate representation of the data. In addition to the varied methods of analysis, experimental and analytical details are commonly under-reported. Consequently, publications reporting data from laser microirradiation coupled with fluorescence microscopy experiments need to be carefully and critically assessed by readers. Here, we undertake a systematic investigation of commonly reported corrections used in the analysis of laser microirradiation data. We validate the critical need to correct data for photobleaching and we identify key experimental parameters that must be accounted for when presenting data from laser microirradiation experiments. Furthermore, we propose a straightforward, four-step analytical protocol that can readily be applied across platforms and that aims to improve the quality of data reporting in the DNA damage field.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":300,"journal":{"name":"DNA Repair","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 103545"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The analysis of protein recruitment to laser microirradiation-induced DNA damage in live cells: Best practices for data analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ryan M. Bianchini,&nbsp;Ebba U. Kurz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dnarep.2023.103545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Laser microirradiation coupled with live-cell fluorescence microscopy<span> is a powerful technique that has been used widely in studying the recruitment and retention of proteins at sites of DNA damage. Results obtained from this technique can be found in published works by both seasoned and infrequent users of microscopy. However, like many other microscopy-based techniques, the presentation of data from laser microirradiation experiments is inconsistent; papers report a wide assortment of analytic techniques, not all of which result in accurate and/or appropriate representation of the data. In addition to the varied methods of analysis, experimental and analytical details are commonly under-reported. Consequently, publications reporting data from laser microirradiation coupled with fluorescence microscopy experiments need to be carefully and critically assessed by readers. Here, we undertake a systematic investigation of commonly reported corrections used in the analysis of laser microirradiation data. We validate the critical need to correct data for photobleaching and we identify key experimental parameters that must be accounted for when presenting data from laser microirradiation experiments. Furthermore, we propose a straightforward, four-step analytical protocol that can readily be applied across platforms and that aims to improve the quality of data reporting in the DNA damage field.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DNA Repair\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103545\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DNA Repair\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S156878642300099X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DNA Repair","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S156878642300099X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

激光微照射与活细胞荧光显微镜相结合是一种强大的技术,已广泛用于研究DNA损伤位点的蛋白质募集和保留。从这种技术获得的结果可以在出版的作品中发现,经验丰富的和不经常使用显微镜的用户。然而,像许多其他基于显微镜的技术一样,激光微照射实验数据的呈现是不一致的;论文报告了各种各样的分析技术,并不是所有的分析技术都能准确和/或适当地表示数据。除了不同的分析方法外,实验和分析细节通常被低估。因此,报告激光微照射与荧光显微镜实验数据的出版物需要读者仔细和批判性地评估。在这里,我们对激光微辐照数据分析中常用的修正进行了系统的调查。我们验证了纠正光漂白数据的关键需求,并确定了在呈现激光微辐照实验数据时必须考虑的关键实验参数。此外,我们提出了一个简单的四步分析方案,可以很容易地跨平台应用,旨在提高DNA损伤领域数据报告的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The analysis of protein recruitment to laser microirradiation-induced DNA damage in live cells: Best practices for data analysis

Laser microirradiation coupled with live-cell fluorescence microscopy is a powerful technique that has been used widely in studying the recruitment and retention of proteins at sites of DNA damage. Results obtained from this technique can be found in published works by both seasoned and infrequent users of microscopy. However, like many other microscopy-based techniques, the presentation of data from laser microirradiation experiments is inconsistent; papers report a wide assortment of analytic techniques, not all of which result in accurate and/or appropriate representation of the data. In addition to the varied methods of analysis, experimental and analytical details are commonly under-reported. Consequently, publications reporting data from laser microirradiation coupled with fluorescence microscopy experiments need to be carefully and critically assessed by readers. Here, we undertake a systematic investigation of commonly reported corrections used in the analysis of laser microirradiation data. We validate the critical need to correct data for photobleaching and we identify key experimental parameters that must be accounted for when presenting data from laser microirradiation experiments. Furthermore, we propose a straightforward, four-step analytical protocol that can readily be applied across platforms and that aims to improve the quality of data reporting in the DNA damage field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DNA Repair
DNA Repair 生物-毒理学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: DNA Repair provides a forum for the comprehensive coverage of DNA repair and cellular responses to DNA damage. The journal publishes original observations on genetic, cellular, biochemical, structural and molecular aspects of DNA repair, mutagenesis, cell cycle regulation, apoptosis and other biological responses in cells exposed to genomic insult, as well as their relationship to human disease. DNA Repair publishes full-length research articles, brief reports on research, and reviews. The journal welcomes articles describing databases, methods and new technologies supporting research on DNA repair and responses to DNA damage. Letters to the Editor, hot topics and classics in DNA repair, historical reflections, book reviews and meeting reports also will be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Discovery of KPT-6566 as STAG1/2 Inhibitor sensitizing PARP and NHEJ Inhibitors to suppress tumor cells growth in vitro Intersection of the fragile X-related disorders and the DNA damage response One-ended and two-ended breaks at nickase-broken replication forks Transient HR enhancement by RAD51-stimulatory compound confers protection on intestinal rather than hematopoietic tissue against irradiation in mice 53BP1-the ‘Pandora’s box’ of genome integrity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1