在英国一些地区,社会经济不平等对死亡率的影响是在减少还是在增加?观察性研究,1990-1998年。

Philip Rees, Dominic Brown, Paul Norman, Daniel Dorling
{"title":"在英国一些地区,社会经济不平等对死亡率的影响是在减少还是在增加?观察性研究,1990-1998年。","authors":"Philip Rees,&nbsp;Dominic Brown,&nbsp;Paul Norman,&nbsp;Daniel Dorling","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdg055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper evaluates claims in a recent study that inequalities in small area mortality rates have lessened. We examine the effect of differently estimated populations on time trends in age-specific mortality rates for Yorkshire and the Humber and East of England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Populations were estimated for wards using four methods that introduce increasing amounts of information. Age-specific mortality rates for age-groups 45-54, 55-64, 65-74 and 75-84 for both sexes were calculated for population-weighted deprivation quintiles. Inequality was tracked using ratios of rates in the most deprived quintile divided bythose in the least.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When constant 1991 populations are used, rate ratios decrease for all age-sex groups, indicating shrinking inequality. When a method adjusting small area populations to official district estimates is used, both decreases and increases are observed in the mortality rate ratios. These results differ from Trent region findings of decreases in inequality. When small area populations are cohort-survived and adjusted to district populations, most differences in rate ratios indicate increasing inequality. When a method is used that includes information on migration and special populations, then seven out of eight age-sex groups exhibit increasing inequality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A judgement about trends in mortality inequality is highly dependent upon the denominator population used. Simpler estimation methods result in convergence of rate ratios, whereas more sophisticated methods result in increasing inequalities in most age-sex groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":77224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/pubmed/fdg055","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are socioeconomic inequalities in mortality decreasing or increasing within some British regions? An observational study, 1990-1998.\",\"authors\":\"Philip Rees,&nbsp;Dominic Brown,&nbsp;Paul Norman,&nbsp;Daniel Dorling\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/pubmed/fdg055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper evaluates claims in a recent study that inequalities in small area mortality rates have lessened. We examine the effect of differently estimated populations on time trends in age-specific mortality rates for Yorkshire and the Humber and East of England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Populations were estimated for wards using four methods that introduce increasing amounts of information. Age-specific mortality rates for age-groups 45-54, 55-64, 65-74 and 75-84 for both sexes were calculated for population-weighted deprivation quintiles. Inequality was tracked using ratios of rates in the most deprived quintile divided bythose in the least.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When constant 1991 populations are used, rate ratios decrease for all age-sex groups, indicating shrinking inequality. When a method adjusting small area populations to official district estimates is used, both decreases and increases are observed in the mortality rate ratios. These results differ from Trent region findings of decreases in inequality. When small area populations are cohort-survived and adjusted to district populations, most differences in rate ratios indicate increasing inequality. When a method is used that includes information on migration and special populations, then seven out of eight age-sex groups exhibit increasing inequality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A judgement about trends in mortality inequality is highly dependent upon the denominator population used. Simpler estimation methods result in convergence of rate ratios, whereas more sophisticated methods result in increasing inequalities in most age-sex groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of public health medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/pubmed/fdg055\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of public health medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdg055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdg055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

背景:本文评估了最近一项研究中关于小地区死亡率不平等现象有所减少的说法。我们研究了不同估计人口对约克郡、亨伯和英格兰东部特定年龄死亡率时间趋势的影响。方法:采用四种增加信息量的方法对病区人口进行估计。按人口加权剥夺五分位数计算了45-54岁、55-64岁、65-74岁和75-84岁男女年龄组的年龄死亡率。追踪不平等的方法是用最贫困的五分之一人口的比率除以最贫困的五分之一人口的比率。结果:当使用恒定的1991年人口时,所有年龄-性别群体的比率下降,表明不平等缩小。当采用将小地区人口调整为官方地区估计数的方法时,可以观察到死亡率比率的下降和上升。这些结果与特伦特地区不平等程度下降的结果不同。当小区域人口进行群体存活并调整为地区人口时,大多数比率差异表明不平等正在加剧。如果采用一种包括移民和特殊人群信息的方法,那么8个年龄性别群体中有7个表现出日益严重的不平等。结论:对死亡率不平等趋势的判断高度依赖于所使用的分母人口。简单的估计方法导致比率的收敛,而更复杂的方法导致大多数年龄-性别群体的不平等加剧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are socioeconomic inequalities in mortality decreasing or increasing within some British regions? An observational study, 1990-1998.

Background: This paper evaluates claims in a recent study that inequalities in small area mortality rates have lessened. We examine the effect of differently estimated populations on time trends in age-specific mortality rates for Yorkshire and the Humber and East of England.

Methods: Populations were estimated for wards using four methods that introduce increasing amounts of information. Age-specific mortality rates for age-groups 45-54, 55-64, 65-74 and 75-84 for both sexes were calculated for population-weighted deprivation quintiles. Inequality was tracked using ratios of rates in the most deprived quintile divided bythose in the least.

Results: When constant 1991 populations are used, rate ratios decrease for all age-sex groups, indicating shrinking inequality. When a method adjusting small area populations to official district estimates is used, both decreases and increases are observed in the mortality rate ratios. These results differ from Trent region findings of decreases in inequality. When small area populations are cohort-survived and adjusted to district populations, most differences in rate ratios indicate increasing inequality. When a method is used that includes information on migration and special populations, then seven out of eight age-sex groups exhibit increasing inequality.

Conclusions: A judgement about trends in mortality inequality is highly dependent upon the denominator population used. Simpler estimation methods result in convergence of rate ratios, whereas more sophisticated methods result in increasing inequalities in most age-sex groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Public health medicine. Military Health Care : From Pre-Deployment to Post-Separation Urban-rural differences in self-reported limiting long-term illness in Scotland. Inhalation sedation with nitrous oxide as an alternative to dental general anaesthesia for children. Cancer patients' awareness about their diagnosis: a population-based study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1