{"title":"1例Silver-Russel综合征患者父系反向易位t(11;16)(p13;q24.3)","authors":"Vundinti Babu Rao, Kerketta Lily, Korgaonkar Seema, Kanjaksha Ghosh, Mohanty Dipika","doi":"10.1016/S0003-3995(03)00028-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We describe a 7-month-old male child with Silver–Russel syndrome (SRS) phenotype, presented with two major clinical features: low birth weight, short stature, and minor features, such as macrocephaly, clinodactyly, essential for the diagnosis of SRS. Routine cytogenetic studies with GTG-banding showed 46,XY,t(11;16)(p13;q24.3). Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with single copy probes BAC (11p13) and PAC (16q24.3), showed a reciprocal translocation. Chromosomal analysis of the mother was normal and the phenotypically normal father had apparently identical translocation t(11;16)(p13;q24.3). The disruption of growth factor genes at 11p and 16q breakpoint regions due to reciprocal translocation in the father might have caused SRS phenotype in the child.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100089,"journal":{"name":"Annales de Génétique","volume":"46 4","pages":"Pages 475-478"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0003-3995(03)00028-5","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paternal reciprocal translocation t(11;16)(p13;q24.3) in a Silver–Russel syndrome patient\",\"authors\":\"Vundinti Babu Rao, Kerketta Lily, Korgaonkar Seema, Kanjaksha Ghosh, Mohanty Dipika\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0003-3995(03)00028-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We describe a 7-month-old male child with Silver–Russel syndrome (SRS) phenotype, presented with two major clinical features: low birth weight, short stature, and minor features, such as macrocephaly, clinodactyly, essential for the diagnosis of SRS. Routine cytogenetic studies with GTG-banding showed 46,XY,t(11;16)(p13;q24.3). Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with single copy probes BAC (11p13) and PAC (16q24.3), showed a reciprocal translocation. Chromosomal analysis of the mother was normal and the phenotypically normal father had apparently identical translocation t(11;16)(p13;q24.3). The disruption of growth factor genes at 11p and 16q breakpoint regions due to reciprocal translocation in the father might have caused SRS phenotype in the child.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales de Génétique\",\"volume\":\"46 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 475-478\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0003-3995(03)00028-5\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales de Génétique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003399503000285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de Génétique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003399503000285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Paternal reciprocal translocation t(11;16)(p13;q24.3) in a Silver–Russel syndrome patient
We describe a 7-month-old male child with Silver–Russel syndrome (SRS) phenotype, presented with two major clinical features: low birth weight, short stature, and minor features, such as macrocephaly, clinodactyly, essential for the diagnosis of SRS. Routine cytogenetic studies with GTG-banding showed 46,XY,t(11;16)(p13;q24.3). Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with single copy probes BAC (11p13) and PAC (16q24.3), showed a reciprocal translocation. Chromosomal analysis of the mother was normal and the phenotypically normal father had apparently identical translocation t(11;16)(p13;q24.3). The disruption of growth factor genes at 11p and 16q breakpoint regions due to reciprocal translocation in the father might have caused SRS phenotype in the child.